Integrating CLIL for Enhanced Vocabulary Learning
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate how the CLIL approach improved students' vocabulary. The issue to be answered is whether the CLIL approach has a substantial impact on student vocabulary. The working hypothesis provides a rough solution to this question: using the CLIL technique improves students' vocabulary in a good and meaningful way. The study employed a quasi-experimental design, with a control and an experimental class. Tests were used to collect data, both before and after. Pre-test data were obtained before to the CLIL method's implementation, whereas post-test data were collected following its implementation. Based on the results of the normality and homogeneity tests, the data were declared credible for hypothesis testing. In this study, the differences in vocabulary acquisition between the control and experimental classes were determined using a t-test with a significance level of 0.05. Based on the research findings, many recommendations are made to English instructors, students, and other researchers. English teachers might explore the advantages of adopting CLIL strategies to help pupils improve their vocabulary. Students can also employ CLIL approaches to enhance their vocabulary learning. Other researchers should consider the findings and limitations of this study while studying students at various levels. Classroom action research with the goal of increasing student vocabulary.
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2025 Punggulina Andawaty Tiven, Renata Vigeleyn Nikijuluw, Glorya Mustamu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who decide to share their articles with this journal must agree with these requisites:
|
1. The author, as the copyright owner, gives Matai the right to publish their work 2. Authors can share their articles, but they have to use Matai's published version by acknowledging Matai as the source. 3. Authors are encouraged to share their work online in order to let people know about their articles which can lead to more citations of the published work. |
