PROBLEM SOLVING ABILITY OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN SOLVING HOTS QUESTIONS

  • Cut Wira Sukma Martha Universitas Riau
  • Maimunah Maimunah Universitas Riau
  • Yenita Roza Universitas Riau
Keywords: hots questions, mathematical problem solving ability, social arithmetic

Abstract

In the 21st Century Learning, students are encouraged to be more creative in solving mathematical problems that lead to the High Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) level of thinking. The ability to solve problems is the ability to reason, understand problems, plan strategies, carry out procedures in solving problems, and draw conclusions. This study aimed to analyze students' mathematical problem-solving skills in solving HOTS questions. It is qualitative research with a descriptive method. The subjects of this research were 15 7th grade class students of Public Junior High School 39 Pekanbaru. The data collection method used was a test technique using a test instrument consisting of 2 HOTS questions of mathematical problem-solving ability and using the method of independent interviews to research subjects. The data collected was then analyzed through 3 stages: data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion. The results showed that 3 students had problem-solving skills, 8 had moderate problem-solving skills, and 4 had low problem-solving skills. Based on student self-tests and interviews, the seventh-grade Public Junior High School 39 Pekanbaru students average have moderate mathematical problem-solving abilities. Based on the results of the study it can be concluded that students can answer HOTS questions quite well in arithmetic material. each category of students has abilities and deficiencies in answering HOTS questions. From the results of this study, the teacher's role is very important to familiarize students with solving HOTS questions and creating learning innovations. By familiarizing students with solving problems in learning mathematics, students will not only be able to solve the questions given but also solve problems in everyday life

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Apriliawan, A., Gembong, S., & Sanusi, S. (2013). Analisis kesalahan penyelesaian soal uraian matematika siswa MTs pada pokok bahasan unsur-unsur lingkaran. JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika), 1(2).

Amam, A. (2017). Penilaian kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa SMP. Teorema: Teori dan Riset Matematika, 2(1), 39-46.

Annizar, A. M. R., Sisworo, S., & Sudirman, S. (2018). Pemecahan Masalah menggunakan Model IDEAL pada Siswa Kelas X Berkategori Fast-Accurate. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 3(5), 634-640.

Aris Shoimin, (2014), 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013 [68 Innovative Learning Models in the 2013 Curriculum], Yogyakarta: AR-RUZZ MEDIA

Arifin, Z., & Retnawati, H. (2015). Analisis Instrumen Pengukur Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Matematika Siswa SMA. In Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika Uny (Vol. 20, pp. 783-790).

Astuti, N. (2020). Analisis kesulitan siswa smp dalam menyelesaikan soal hots (higher order thinking skill). Prosiding Sesiomadika, 2(1b).

Chotimah, N. H. (2014). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Generatif (MPG) Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah dan Disposisi Matematis Siswa di Kelas X pada SMA Negeri 8 Palembang. Skripsi. Universitas PGRI Palembang.

Puspa, R. D., Asari, A. R., & Sukoriyanto, S. (2019). Analisis kemampuan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal tipe Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) ditinjau dari tahapan pemecahan masalah Polya. Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika, 3(2), 86-94.

Irawati, T. N. (2018). Analisis kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi siswa SMP dalam menyelesaikan soal pemecahan masalah matematika pada materi bilangan bulat. Gammath: Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 67-73.

Irmawati, R., Rahayu, A., & Ratnasari, S. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). JEID: Journal of Educational Integration and Development, 1(4), 247-257.

Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2016) Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Isi Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah, Jakarta: KEMENDIKBUD

Putri, M. E. (2021). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Bertipe Higher Order Thinking Skill (Hots) Berdasarkan Prosedur Newman (Doctoral Dissertation, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang).

Rambe, A. Y. F., & Afri, L. D. (2020). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal materi barisan dan deret. AXIOM: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Matematika, 9(2), 175-187.

Raufany, G., & Solfitri, T. (2019). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Kelas X IPA 1 SMAN 2 Pekanbaru dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pertidaksamaan Rasional dan Irasional. Jurnal Prinsip Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 19-22.

Simatupang, R., & Napitupulu, E. (2020). Matematis Dan Self-Efficacy Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning. Paradikma Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika., 13(1), 29–39.

Sumartini, T. S. (2016). Peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa melalui pembelajaran berbasis masalah. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 148-158.

Wibowo, P. H. E. (2016). Pemberian Scaffolding Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi (Higher Order Thinking Skills) Kelas X SMA Berdasarkan Kemampuan Matematika Siswa. MATHEdunesa, 5(2).

Widhiyani, I. T., Sukajaya, I. N., & Suweken, G. (2019). Pengembangan Soal Higher Order Thinking Skills Untuk Pengkategorian Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Geometri Siswa Smp. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Indonesia, 8(2), 161-170.

Widodo, S. A. (2013). Analisis kesalahan dalam pemecahan masalah divergensi tipe membuktikan pada mahasiswa matematika. Jurnal pendidikan dan pengajaran, 46(2 Juli).

Published
2022-12-31
How to Cite
Martha, C., Maimunah, M., & Roza, Y. (2022). PROBLEM SOLVING ABILITY OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN SOLVING HOTS QUESTIONS. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (JUPITEK), 5(2), 138-144. https://doi.org/10.30598/jupitekvol5iss2pp138-144