MATHEMATICS MODEL IN VITALITY ANALYSIS OF THE LIMOLA LANGUAGE

  • Muhammad Hajarul Aswad A Mathematics Department, Palopo State Islamic Institute, Indonesia
  • Rusdiansyah Rusdiansyah English Education Department, Palopo State Islamic Institute, Indonesia
  • Didiharyono - Research Centre for Computing, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN)
  • Yusril Ihsa Saputra Mathematics Department, Palopo State Islamic Institute, Indonesia
  • Imam Fadli English Education Department, Palopo State Islamic Institute, Indonesia
Keywords: Dynamical System, Limola Language, Mathematics model, Vitality

Abstract

One of the regional languages in Tana Luwu, especially in North Luwu Regency, is the Limola language. Limola language is a regional language used in communication by the people of Sassa Village. This research utilizes the Pinasco and Romanelli (PR) model to analyze the vitality of the Limola language. The language's sustainability is assessed through a questionnaire with vitality indicators based on UNESCO. Meanwhile, birth and death rates are derived from statistical data from North Luwu. This research found that the model used can explain the possibility of using the Limola language by taking into the carrying capacity and average birth and death rates of users of the Limola language. There are three conditions found. The third condition, despite the birth and death rates of Limola language users being higher than those of people using other languages, the usage of the Limola language still decreases. This is because the language used to communicate as a child as an indicator of the carrying capacity of the Limola language, is very small. In addition, five out of the nine vitality indicators formulated by UNESCO are endangered, posing a threat to the survival of the Limola language

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

“Which Countries Have The Most Islands?,” WorldAtlas. Accessed: May 12, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/which-countries-have-the-most-islands.html

H. Alwi and D. Sugono, Politik Bahasa: Risalah Seminar Politik Bahasa. Pusat Bahasa, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, 2000.

Muhaemin and Masruddin, “Penelusuran Sejarah Kerajaan Luwu hingga Luwu Kekinian sebagai kerajaan tertua dan kerajaan pertama menganut agama Islam di Sulawesi Selatan: Kajian Sejarah dan Masa kini Tana Luwu dari aspek Multikultural dan Multilingual.” IAIN Palopo, 2016.

P. Mpofu and A. Salawu, “Linguistic Disenfranchisement, Minority Resistance and Language Revitalisation: The Contributions of Ethnolinguistic Online Communities in Zimbabwe,” Cogent Arts & Humanities, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 1551764, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2018.1551764.

“Apa Saja Faktor Punahnya Bahasa Etnis di Indonesia.” Accessed: May 17, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://lipi.go.id/berita/single/Apa-Saja-Faktor-Punahnya-Bahasa-Etnis-di-Indonesia/5724

R. Y. Bourhis and G. Barrette, “Ethnolinguistic Vitality,” in Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics (Second Edition), K. Brown, Ed., Oxford: Elsevier, 2006, pp. 246–249. doi: 10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01280-3.

H. Tondo, “Kepunahan Bahasa-Bahasa Daerah: Faktor Penyebab Dan Implikasi Etnolinguistis,” JMB, vol. 11, no. 2, Art. no. 2, 2009, doi: 10.14203/jmb.v11i2.245.

N. N. Benu, I. K. Artawa, M. S. Satyawati, and K. W. Purnawati, “Local Language Vitality in Kupang City, Indonesia: A Linguistic Landscape Approach,” Cogent Arts & Humanities, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 2153973, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2022.2153973.

I. W. Mulyawan, “Reading Visual Design of Outdoor Signs in Kuta (a Case Study of Multimodal Linguistic Landscapes),” Cogent Arts & Humanities, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 1748987, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2020.1748987.

K. Savski, “Language Policy and Linguistic Landscape: Identity and Struggle in Two Southern Thai Spaces,” Linguistic Landscape, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 128–150, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1075/ll.20008.sav.

Idawati, T. Ahmad, Kamaruddin, and Ramly, “Morphosyntax of Tae’ Language (Morfosintaksis Bahasa Tae’),” Journal of Language Teaching and Research (JLTR), vol. 7, no. 3, 2016.

M. Thayyib, “Deixis in Bahasa Tae’ and English: A Pragmatics Contrastive Analysis,” Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, vol. 1, no. 1, 2014.

S. Harisah, “Ungkapan Bahasa Tae’ yang Merepresentasikan Kearifan Lokal Etnik Luwu,” Universitas Negeri Malang, 2014.

J. Garing, “Preposisi dan Konjungsi dalam Bahasa Tae’,” in Bunga Rampai Bahasa dan Sastra, Edisi Bahasa Balai Bahasa Sulawesi Selatan, 2016.

M. Masruddin, “Wotu Language in Endangered Phase: Solution for Revitalizing Wotu Language,” presented at the International Seminar “Language Maintenance and Shift” V ISSN; 2088-6799, Hotel NEO Semarang, Sep. 2015, pp. 91–94. Accessed: May 20, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://lamas.undip.ac.id

M. N. Assyddyq, “Penggunaan Bahasa Wotu, Bugis Dan Bahasa Indonesia Pada Empat Ranah Kebahasaan Di Desa Lampenai Dan Desa Bawalipu (studi Sosiolinguistik),” PhD Thesis, Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2016.

W. Firdaus, “Tekanan Kepunahan Bahasa Suwawa: Analisis Tingkat Daya Hidup Bahasa (the Pressure of Extinction of Suwawa Language: Language Life-Force Analysis),” Metalingua: Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa, vol. 16, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.26499/metalingua.v16i2.240.

S. Yulianti and W. Firdaus, “Keterancaman Bahasa Roswar: Analisis Daya Hidup Bahasa,” Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, vol. 9, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.26499/rnh.v9i2.2942.

T. P. Yunita and M. Syafwan, “Pemodelan Kompetisi Antar Bahasa Pada Komunitas Monolingual Dan Bilingual,” Jurnal Matematika UNAND, vol. 5, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.25077/jmu.5.1.108-115.2016.

N. Rahma, M. Subhan, and Y. Rizal, “Model Matematika Dinamika Bahasa Minang dan Bahasa Indonesia”.

M. Patriarca, E. Heinsalu, and J. L. Leonard, Languages in Space and Time: Models and Methods from Complex Systems Theory. in Physics of Society: Econophysics and Sociophysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. doi: 10.1017/9781108480659.

UNESCO Ad hoc Expert Group on Endangered Languages, “Language Vitality and Endangerment.” Mar. 2023. Accessed: Feb. 05, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000183699

R. Landry, R. Allard, K. Deveau, and S. St-Onge, “Minority Language Learning and Use: Can Self-Determination Counter Social Determinism?,” Journal of Language and Social Psychology, vol. 41, p. 0261927X2110411, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1177/0261927X211041153.

H. Bleakley and A. Chin, “What Holds Back the Second Generation?: The Intergenerational Transmission of Language Human Capital Among Immigrants,” Journal of Human Resources, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 267–298, Mar. 2008, doi: 10.3368/jhr.43.2.267.

T. Casey and C. Dustmann, “Intergenerational Transmission of Language Capital and Economic Outcomes,” Journal of Human Resources, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 660–687, Jul. 2008, doi: 10.3368/jhr.43.3.660.

K. D. Thompson, “Queering Language Socialization: Fostering Inclusive Muslim Interpretations Through Talk-in-Interaction,” Language & Communication, vol. 74, pp. 29–40, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.langcom.2020.05.002.

C. Johnson and T. O. Elder, “Language Vitality and Endangerment.” 2002. [Online]. Available: https://ich.unesco.org/doc/src/00120-EN.pdf

Published
2024-03-01
How to Cite
[1]
M. Aswad A, R. Rusdiansyah, D. -, Y. Saputra, and I. Fadli, “MATHEMATICS MODEL IN VITALITY ANALYSIS OF THE LIMOLA LANGUAGE”, BAREKENG: J. Math. & App., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 0223-0232, Mar. 2024.