Peer Review Process
The submitted manuscript is first reviewed by an editor. It will be evaluated in the Journal office, whether it is suitable for BAREKENG: Jurnal ilmu matematika dan terapan, focus and scope or has a major methodological flaw and similarity score by using Plagiarism Checker X.
The manuscript and assessment form will be sent to two reviewers (Double Blind Review). Reviewers' comments and form are then sent to the corresponding author for necessary actions and responses.
The suggested decision will be evaluated in an editorial board meeting. Afterward, the editor will send the final decision to the corresponding author.
Every submitted article is independently reviewed by at least two peer-reviewers (Double Blind). The decision for publication, amendment, or rejection is based upon their reports/recommendation. After being reviewed, there will be three kinds of editor decision based on the reviewers’ recommendation:
- Accept Submission: The submission will be accepted without revisions.
- Revisions Required: The submission will be accepted after minor changes have been made.
- Resubmit for Review: The submission needs to be re-worked, but with significant changes, may be accepted. It will require a second round of review, however.
The articles sent back to the authors for revision should be returned to the editor without delay. The revised article returned no more than 14 days. The revised article can be sent to editorial through the Online Submission Interface. (Link of Assessment Form)
Redaksi BAREKENG: Jurnal ilmu matematika dan terapan,
Ex. UT Building , 2nd Floor,
Mathematic Department, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Pattimura