GROUPING REGENCIES/CITIES IN WEST JAVA PROVINCE BASED ON PEOPLE’S WELFARE INDICATORS USING BIPLOT AND CLUSTERING

  • Priscilla Ardine Puspitasari Statistics Department, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1343-9007
  • Defi Yusti Faidah Statistics Department, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7474-2336
  • Triyani Hendrawati Statistics Department, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7813-3370
Keywords: Biplot, People’s Welfare, Ward’s Method, West Java Province

Abstract

The level of people's welfare in West Java Province still requires improvement in each indicator. People's welfare indicators include poverty, employment, education, housing, consumption patterns, health, and population. The level of people's welfare can be known by reviewing all dimensions based on linear relationships between regencies/cities to produce information on indicators that still need improvement. These efforts can assist the West Java Provincial Government determine regional policies and programs for equitable distribution and improve people's welfare in all regencies/cities. The data used in this study are secondary data derived from the Website of the BPS of West Java Province 2023, West Java Open Data Province 2023, and Diskominfo Statistics Division (Jabar Digital Service). The grouping of regencies/cities was done using Principal Component Analysis based on Singular Value Decomposition biplot analysis, and it continued with Ward's Method Clustering based on Euclidean distance calculation. The analysis results formed four groups with different people's welfare indicators characteristics. The group that needs top priority in improvement is group 2 because it has a low level of people's welfare. Cluster 1 contains regencies/cities with high people's welfare characteristics in the housing and employment indicators. Cluster 3 includes regencies/municipalities with high people's welfare characteristics in the consumption pattern level, poverty, employment, and health indicators. Cluster 4 contains cities with high people's welfare characteristics in education and population indicators.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BPS, Statistik Kesejahteraan Rakyat Provinsi Jawa Barat. Bandung: BPS, 2022.

BAPPEDA, Rancangan Akhir RPJMD Tahun 2018-2023. Bandung: BAPPEDA, 2018.

BPS, Indikator Kesejahteraan Rakyat Provinsi Jawa Barat Tahun 2022. Bandung: BPS, 2023.

BAPPEDA, Rancangan Awal RKPD Tahun 2023. Bandung: BAPPEDA, 2023.

E. Schubert, “HACAM: Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering Around Medoids – and its Limitations,” CEUR Workshop Proc, pp. 191–204, 2021.

Z. A. Leleury and A. E. Wokanubun, “Analisis Biplot pada Pemetaan Karakteristik Kemiskinan di Provinsi Maluku,” Jurnal Ilmu Matematika dan Terapan, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 21–31, 2015.

N. Afira and A. W. Wijayanto, “Analisis Cluster Kemiskinan Provinsi di Indonesia Tahun 2019 dengan Metode Partitioning dan Hierarki,” Jurnal Sistem Komputer, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 101–109, 2021.

R. Firliana, R. Wulanningrum, and W. Sasongko, “Implementasi Principal Component Analysis (PCA) Untuk Pengenalan Wajah Manusia,” Nusantara of Engineering Journal, vol. 2, no. 1, 2015.

N. Ulinnuh and R. Veriani, “Analisis Cluster dalam Pengelompokan Provinsi di Indonesia Berdasarkan Variabel Penyakit Menular Menggunakan Metode Complete Linkage, Average Linkage, dan Ward,” Jurnal Nasional Informatika dan Teknologi Jaringan, vol. 5, no. 1, 2020.

I. T. Jolliffe, Principal Components Analysis, 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 2012.

I. Ginanjar, U. S. Pasaribu, and S. W. Indratno, “A measure for objects clustering in principal component analysis biplot: A case study in inter-city buses maintenance cost data,” AIP Conf Proc, pp. 1827, 2017.

A. A. Mattjik and I. M. Sumertajaya, Sidik Peubah Ganda (First). Bogor: IPB Press, 2011.

S. Saracli, N. Dogan, and I. Dogan, “Comparison of Hierarchical Cluster Analysis Methods by Cophenetic Correlation,” J Inequal Appl, vol. 203, no. 1, 2013.

A. M. Jarman, “Hierarchical Cluster Analysis: Comparison of Single Linkage, Complete Linkage, Average Linkage, and Centroid Linkage Method,” Researchgate Publication, 2020.

A. C. Rencher, Methods of Multivariate Analysis, 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2012.

M. Charrad, N. Ghazzali, V. Boiteau, and A. Niknafs, “NBClust: An R Package for Determining the Relevant Number of Clusters in a Data Set,” J Stat Softw, vol. 61, no. 6, 2014.

Published
2024-07-31
How to Cite
[1]
P. Puspitasari, D. Faidah, and T. Hendrawati, “GROUPING REGENCIES/CITIES IN WEST JAVA PROVINCE BASED ON PEOPLE’S WELFARE INDICATORS USING BIPLOT AND CLUSTERING”, BAREKENG: J. Math. & App., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1839-1852, Jul. 2024.