MODELING CUSTOMER LIFETIME VALUE WITH MARKOV CHAIN IN THE INSURANCE INDUSTRY

  • Adilan Widyawan Mahdiyasa Mathematics Study Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9940-3920
  • Udjianna Sekteria Pasaribu Mathematics Study Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4508-2057
  • Kurnia Novita Sari Mathematics Study Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4821-8378
Keywords: Customer lifetime value, Health insurance, Markov chain, Survival analysis

Abstract

In the competitive insurance industry, accurately predicting Customer Lifetime Value (CLV) is vital for sustaining long-term profitability and optimizing resource allocation. Traditional static models often fail to capture the dynamic and uncertain nature of customer behavior, which is influenced by factors such as life changes, economic conditions, and evolving product offerings. To address these limitations, this paper proposes an advanced modeling approach that integrates Markov Chains with survival analysis. Markov Chains are well-suited for modeling stochastic processes, where future states depend on current conditions, while survival analysis provides insights into event timing and likelihood for estimating the insurance premium. The proposed model combines these approaches to make a more complete and accurate prediction of CLV. This helps insurers make better decisions and improves the overall performance of their business. We employ the data of customer behavior from the insurance company in Bandung, Indonesia from 1994 to 2020. We found that CLV in the insurance industry is significantly affected by customer behavior.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

C. Eckert, C. Neunsinger, and K. Osterrieder, “Managing customer satisfaction: digital applications for insurance companies,” The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 569–602, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1057/s41288-021-00257-z.

A. Richter, J. Ruß, and S. Schelling, “Insurance customer behavior: Lessons from behavioral economics,” Risk Management and Insurance Review, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 183–205, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1111/rmir.12121.

A. Widyawan, U. S. Pasaribu, Henintyas, and D. Permana, “Estimation of customer lifetime value of a health insurance with interest rates obeying uniform distribution,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1692, no. 1, p. 020030, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1063/1.4936458.

N. Ali and O. S. Shabn, “Customer lifetime value (CLV) insights for strategic marketing success and its impact on organizational financial performance,” Cogent Business & Management, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 2361321, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2361321.

R. Ferrentino, M. T. Cuomo, and C. Boniello, “On the customer lifetime value: a mathematical perspective,” Computational Management Science, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 521–539, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10287-016-0266-1.

J. Z. Zhang and C.-W. Chang, “Consumer dynamics: theories, methods, and emerging directions,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 166–196, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11747-020-00720-8.

B. Ivens, K. Kasper-Brauer, A. Leischnig, and S. C. Thornton, “Implementing customer relationship management successfully: A configurational perspective,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 199, p. 123083, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123083.

V. Guerola-Navarro, H. Gil-Gomez, R. Oltra-Badenes, and P. Soto-Acosta, “Customer relationship management and its impact on entrepreneurial marketing: a literature review,” International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 507–547, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11365-022-00800-x.

J. K. Grewal, M. Krzywinski, and N. Altman, “Markov models—Markov chains,” Nature Methods, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 663–664, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0476-x.

D. Layden et al., “Quantum-enhanced Markov chain Monte Carlo,” Nature, vol. 619, no. 7969, pp. 282–287, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06095-4.

D.-M. Zhu, W.-K. Ching, R. J. Elliott, T.-K. Siu, and L. Zhang, “A Higher-order interactive hidden Markov model and its applications,” OR Spectrum, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1055–1069, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s00291-017-0484-0.

A. W. Mahdiyasa and A. Grahito, “Probability of failure model in mechanical component because of fatigue,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1245, no. 1, p. 012053, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1245/1/012053.

A. W. Mahdiyasa, D. J. Large, B. P. Muljadi, and M. Icardi, “Modelling the influence of mechanical-ecohydrological feedback on the nonlinear dynamics of peatlands,” Ecological Modelling, vol. 478, p. 110299, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110299.

U. Mukhaiyar, A. W. Mahdiyasa, K. N. Sari, and N. T. Noviana, “The generalized STAR modeling with minimum spanning tree approach of spatial weight matrix,” Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics, vol. 10, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/applied-mathematics-and-statistics/articles/10.3389/fams.2024.1417037

A. W. Mahdiyasa, Modelling fully coupled mechanical, ecological, and hydrological feedback on peatland development. Nottingham: University of Nottingham, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/77125/1/Mahdiyasa%2C%20Adilan%2C%2020206640%2C%20Corrections.pdf

A. W. Mahdiyasa, D. J. Large, B. P. Muljadi, M. Icardi, and S. Triantafyllou, “MPeat—A fully coupled mechanical-ecohydrological model of peatland development,” Ecohydrology, vol. 15, no. 1, p. e2361, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1002/eco.2361.

U. Mukhaiyar et al., “Risk Mapping of Groundwater Level in Peatland Area Utilizing a Spatio- Temporal Model with Weight Constructed Based on Minimum Spanning Tree,” Research Square, pp. 1–24, 2024, doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4119220/v1.

A. W. Mahdiyasa, D. J. Large, M. Icardi, and B. P. Muljadi, “MPeat2D – a fully coupled mechanical–ecohydrological model of peatland development in two dimensions,” Earth Surface Dynamics, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 929–952, 2024, doi: 10.5194/esurf-12-929-2024.

A. Mahdiyasa, D. Large, B. Muljadi, and M. Icardi, “Modelling the effect of mechanical deformation on the peatland carbon stock resilience,” in EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, in EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. Apr. 2021, pp. EGU21-4530. doi: 10.5194/egusphere-egu21-4530.

U. Mukhaiyar et al., “The generalized STAR modelling with three-dimensional of spatial weight matrix in predicting the Indonesia peatland’s water level,” Environ. Sci. Eur., vol. 36, no. 1, p. 180, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1186/s12302-024-00979-6.

R. Douc, E. Moulines, P. Priouret, and P. Soulier, “Markov Chains: Basic Definitions,” in Markov Chains, R. Douc, E. Moulines, P. Priouret, and P. Soulier, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 3–25. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-97704-1_1.

A. Sharma, D. Md. Jadi, and D. Ward, “Analysing the determinants of financial performance for UK insurance companies using financial strength ratings information,” Economic Change and Restructuring, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 683–697, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10644-019-09260-w.

D. Jakovčević, K. Dumičić, and M. Anđelinović, “Measuring recent changes of insurance gross premiums distribution using ten inequality measures: case study of Croatia,” Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 661–675, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1080/1331677X.2017.1305776.

K. Ofori-Boateng, W. Ohemeng, E. Ahawaadong Boro, and E. Kwame Agyapong, “Efficiency, market structure and performance of the insurance industry in an emerging economy,” Cogent Economics & Finance, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 2068784, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1080/23322039.2022.2068784.

Published
2025-01-13
How to Cite
[1]
A. W. Mahdiyasa, U. S. Pasaribu, and K. N. Sari, “MODELING CUSTOMER LIFETIME VALUE WITH MARKOV CHAIN IN THE INSURANCE INDUSTRY”, BAREKENG: J. Math. & App., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 687-696, Jan. 2025.