SISTEM PENDUKUNG PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN REKRUTMEN GURU MENGGUNAKAN LOGIKA FUZZY TAHANI

  • Yayan Eryk Setiawan Universitas Islam Malang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30598/barekengvol14iss2pp259-272
Keywords: Tahani Fuzzy Logic, Supporting System of Decision Making, Teachers Recruitment

Abstract

One effort to get teachers who are competent in their fields is to conduct a teacher recruitment process based on four teacher competencies, namely personal, social, pedagogic, and professional competencies. However, the obstacle of the teacher recruitment process that often done is the subjectivity of decision-making. One way to overcome subjectivity in teacher recruitment is by using tahani fuzzy logic. For this reason, this study aims to determine the implementation of tahani fuzzy logic in the supporting system of decision making for teacher admissions based on the results of the four teacher competency tests. This research consists of three stages. The first stage is determining the function of the degree of membership from the value of personal, social, pedagogical, and professional competencies. The second step is designing the tahani fuzzification program using Microsoft Excel. The third stage is implementing the fuzzy tahani program that successfully created for the decision to make admissions. The results showed that teacher acceptance decision making using tahani fuzzy logic was better than just using an average value. Because tahani fuzzy logic considers various criteria, while the average only considers one criterion that has a high value.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

G. Taufiq, “Logika Fuzzy Tahani untuk Pendukung Keputusan Perekrutan Karyawan Tetap,†Pros. Semin. Nas. Apl. Sains Teknol., no. November, pp. 99–106, 2014.

R. Inayah, T. Martono, and H. Sawiji, “Pengaruh Kompetensi Guru, Motivasi Belajar Siswa, dan Fasilitas Belajar terhadap Prestasi Belajar Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi pada Siswa Kelas XI IPS SMA Negeri 1 Lasem Jawa Tengah Tahun Pelajaran 2011/2012,†Jurnal Pendidikan Insan Mandiri, vol. 1, no. 1. pp. 1–13, 2013.

Y. E. Setiawan, “Analisis Domain dan Dampak Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching Terhadap Pengajaran,†in Reformasi Pendidikan dalam Memasuki ASEAN Economic Community (AEC), 2015, pp. 1263–1271.

Y. E. Setiawan, “The Thinking Process of Students Using Trial and Error Strategies in Generalizing Linear Patterns,†Numer. J. Mat. dan Pendidik. Mat., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2020.

Y. E. Setiawan and Syaifuddin, “Peningkatan Kompetensi Profesionalitas Guru Melalui Pelatihan Desain Pembelajaran Peta Konsep,†J. Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 148–153, 2020.

Y. E. Setiawan, Purwanto, I. N. Parta, and Sisworo, “Generalization Strategy of Linear Patterns From Field-Dependent Cognitive Style,†J. Math. Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 77–94, 2020.

Y. E. Setiawan, “Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menilai Kebenaran Suatu Pernyataan,†J. Didakt. Mat., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 13–31, 2020.

Y. E. Setiawan, “Analisis Kemampuan Siswa dalam Pembuktian Kesebangunan Dua Segitiga,†Al-Khwarizmi J. Pendidik. Mat. dan Ilmu Pengetah. Alam, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 23–38, 2020.

Y. E. Setiawan and Mustangin, “Validitas Model Pembelajaran IDEA ( Issue, Discussion, Establish, and Apply) untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep,†J. Penelit. Pendidik. dan Pengajaran Mat., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 53–60, 2020.

G. Taufiq, “Implementasi Logika Fuzzy Tahani Untuk Model Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Evaluasi Kinerja Karyawan,†J. Pilar Nusa Mandiri, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 12–20, 2016.

A. Rusman, “Logika Tuzzy Tahani Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Penentuan Lulusan Terbaik,†J. Inform., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 31–40, 2016.

M. Susanti, “Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Untuk Penilaian Guru Menggunakan Model Logika Fuzzy Tahani,†Swabumi, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 90–98, 2017.

M. Asrori and A. Z. Falani, “Implementasi Penentuan Pemberian Tunjangan Pendidik & Tenaga Kependidikan Berbasis Fuzzy Database Model Tahani,†J. Insa. Comtech, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 19–25, 2019.

A. Maulana, Y. V. Via, and L. P. Purba, “Penilaian Kinerja Dosen Menggunakan Fuzzy Tahani Berdasarkan Kuisioner Evaluasi Belajar Mengajar,†SCAN, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 53–60, 2015.

Safrizal and Susianto, “Pengembangan Model Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dengan Kombinasi Metode Fuzzy Tahani Dan Topsis Dalam Penilaian Kinerja Instruktur,†J-SAKTI (Jurnal Sains Komput. dan Inform., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 227–242, 2019.

F. A. Sianturi, R. F. Siahaan, and A. Fitra, “Penerapan Metode Fuzzy Model Tahani Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kenaikan Jabatan,†InfoTekJar J. Nas. Inform. dan Teknol. Jar., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 85–90, 2020.

D. Abdullah, H. Djanggih, S. Suendri, H. Cipta, and N. Nofriadi, “Fuzzy Model Tahani as Decision Support System for Employee Promotion,†Int. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 7, no. 2.5, pp. 88–91, 2018.

Published
2020-06-01
How to Cite
[1]
Y. Setiawan, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN REKRUTMEN GURU MENGGUNAKAN LOGIKA FUZZY TAHANI”, BAREKENG: J. Math. & App., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 253-266, Jun. 2020.
Issue
Vol 14 No 2 (2020): BAREKENG: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika dan Terapan
Section
Articles

Authors who publish with this Journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Author retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a creative commons attribution license that allow others to share the work within an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication of this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangement for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g. acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal).
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their websites) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published works.