MATHEMATICS PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS’ DIGITAL LITERACY AND THEIR READINESS TOWARDS 21ST CENTURY LEARNING: A MIXED METHOD STUDY
Abstract
The rapid advancement of technology in Indonesia seems not in line with its utilization, especially in the educational field. According to studies, Indonesian teachers are not ready to implement ICT in their classrooms. Furthermore, most elderly teachers are not sensitive enough to technology changes. When it comes to emergency teaching and learning in the pandemic era, teachers as predicted do not have enough capacity to maximize the use of ICT as the only source. This study aims to find out: (1) if the lack of digital literacy skills already happened in college, and (2) pre-service teachers' readiness to face 21st century education. As the result, this study could not prove that the lack of digital skills occurs in college. The digital literacy skills of pre-service are good (77,6%) and they have received multimedia learning subject from university. Related to their readiness toward 21st century learning, most of them claimed not yet ready because of the lack of skills and knowledge in implementing ICT and because of the lack of ICT facility support.
Downloads
References
Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Tinggi, Buku Panduan:Merdeka Belajar - Kampus Merdeka. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Kemdikbud RI, 2020.
N. A. Noviana, “Jenjang Pendidikan Formal di Indonesia menurut Undang-Undang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional Tahun 2003,” 2014. https://ilmu-pendidikan.net/pendidikan/peraturan/jenjang-pendidikan-formal-di-indonesia-uu-sisdiknas-2003 (accessed Feb. 28, 2022).
T. S. Kaihatu and W. A. Rini, “Kepemimpinan Transformasional dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kepuasan atas Kualitas Kehidupan Kerja Komitmen Organisasi dan Perilaku Ekstra Peran: Studi pada Guru-Guru SMU di Kota Surabaya,” J. Manaj. dan Kewirausahaan, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 49–61, 2007, doi: 10.9744/jmk.9.1.pp.49-61.
M. Thobroni, Belajar dan pembelajaran: Teori dan praktik. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media, 2015.
I. W. Santyasa, “MODEL-MODEL PEMBELAJARAN INOVATIF,” 2007.
A. Januszewski and M. Molenda, Educational Technology: A Definition with Commentary. 2013.
B. Trilling and C. Fadel, 21st Century Skills, Enhanced Edition: Learning for Life in Our Times. California: Jossey-Bass, 2009.
I. F. Rahmadi and E. Hayati, “Literasi Digital, Massive Open Online Courses, dan Kecakapan Belajar Abad 21 Mahasiswa Generasi Milenial,” J. Stud. Komun. dan Media, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 91–104, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.31445/jskm.2020.2486.
Microsoft, “Civility, safety & interaction online: Indonesia,” 2021. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/digital-skills/digital-civility?activetab=dci_reports:primaryr4.
E. M. Coppola, Powering up: Learning to teach well with technology. New York: Teachers College, 2004.
I. Irwan, Z. F. Luthfi, and A. Waldi, “Efektifitas Penggunaan Kahoot! untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa,” Pedagog. J. Pendidik., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 95–104, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.21070/pedagogia.v8i1.1866.
R. E. Mayer, “Incorporating motivation into multimedia learning,” Learn. Instr., vol. 29, pp. 171–173, Feb. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.003.
A. Z. Nu’man, “Efektifitas Penerapan E-Learning Model Edmodo Dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa (Studi Kasus : Smk Muhammadiyah 1 Sukoharjo),” Duta.Com, vol. 7, no. 1, 2014.
P. Purnawarman, S. Susilawati, and W. Sundayana, “The use of Edmodo in teaching writing in a blended learning setting,” Indones. J. Appl. Linguist., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 242, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.17509/ijal.v5i2.1348.
A. Bullock and P. G. de Jong, “Technology-enhanced learning,” in Understanding Medical Education, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2013, pp. 149–160.
Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia-APJII, “Survei Nasional Penetrasi Pengguna Internet Tahun 2018,” 2018.
Badan Pusat Statistik, “Potret pendidikan indonesia: Statistik pendidikan indonesia 2019,” Badan Pusat Statistik, Jakarta, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.bps.go.id/publication/2019/11/29/1deb588ef5fdbfba3343bb51/potret-pendidikan-statistik-pendidikan-indonesia-2019.html.
L. Puspitasari and K. Ishii, “Digital divides and mobile Internet in Indonesia: Impact of smartphones,” Telemat. Informatics, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 472–483, May 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2015.11.001.
C. Husain, “Pemanfaatan teknologi informasi dan komunikasi dalam pembelajaran SMA Muhammadiyah Tarakan,” J. Kebijak. dan Pengemb. Pendidik., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 184–192, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://uswim.e-journal.id/fateksa/article/view/38.
B. (2018) Bakalar, “Justice on both sides: Transforming education through restorative justice,” Am. J. Qual. Res., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 145–149, 2018.
S. Kemp, “Digital 2021: Indonesia,” 2021. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2021-indonesia (accessed Feb. 11, 2021).
A. Budiman, R. Rahmawati, and R. A. Ulfa, “EFL TEACHER’S BELIEF AND PRACTICE ON INTEGRATING ICT IN THE CLASSROOM: A CASE STUDY ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SAMR MODEL IN TEACHING READING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT AT MA ASSALAM, SUKOHARJO,” J. Penelit. Hum., 2018.
N. A. Drajati, L. Tan, S. Haryati, D. Rochsantiningsih, and H. Zainnuri, “INVESTIGATING ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHERS IN DEVELOPING TPACK AND MULTIMODAL LITERACY,” Indones. J. Appl. Linguist., vol. 7, no. 3, p. 575, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.17509/ijal.v7i3.9806.
R. Dwiono, D. Rochsantiningsih, and S. Suparno, “Investigating the Integration Level of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in the English Language Teaching,” Int. J. Lang. Teach. Educ., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 259–274, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.22437/ijolte.v2i3.5752.
S. Lestari, “Analisis Kemampuan Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) pada Guru Biologi SMA dalam Materi Sistem Saraf,” Proceeding Biol. Educ. Conf. Biol. Sci. Enviromental, Learn., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 557–564, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosbi/article/view/7006.
M. Mahdum, “Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) of English Teachers in Pekanbaru, Riau, Indonesia,” Mediterr. J. Soc. Sci., vol. 6, no. 5S1, pp. 168–176, Sep. 2015, doi: 10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n5s1p168.
M. Muhaimin et al., “A sequential explanatory investigation of TPACK: Indonesian science teachers’ survey and perspective,” J. Technol. Sci. Educ., vol. 9, no. 3, p. 269, May 2019, doi: 10.3926/jotse.662.
R. Rasmitadila et al., “The Perceptions of Primary School Teachers of Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic Period: A Case Study in Indonesia,” J. Ethn. Cult. Stud., vol. 7, no. 2, p. 90, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.29333/ejecs/388.
E. Setyaningsih, D. S. Wahyuni, and D. Rochsantiningsih, “Mapping Indonesian EFL Teachers’ Perception and Practice of Technology Integration,” Int. J. Educ., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 44–52, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.17509/ije.v13i1.22643.
M. Marzoan, “STUDI EKSPLORATIF PERSEPSI GURU TERHADAP KEBIJAKAN BELAJAR DARI RUMAH PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID-19,” J. Ilm. Mandala Educ., vol. 6, no. 2, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.36312/jime.v6i2.1422.
L. D. Pratama, W. Lestari, and I. Astutik, “Efektifitas Penggunaan Media Edutainment Di Tengah Pandemi Covid-19,” AKSIOMA J. Progr. Stud. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 413–423, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.24127/ajpm.v9i2.2783.
F. S. P. Pribowo, “Persepsi Guru SD Muhammadiyah Terhadap Penggunaan Gawai Dalam Pembelajaran Di Kelas,” in Literasi Dalam Pendidikan di Era Digital Untuk Generasi Milenial, 2020, pp. 209–219, [Online]. Available: http://journal.um-surabaya.ac.id/index.php/Pro/article/view/4885/2820.
S. Anggianita, Y. Yusnira, and M. S. Rizal, “Persepsi Guru terhadap Pembelajaran Daring di Sekolah Dasar Negeri 013 Kumantan,” J. Educ. Res., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 177–182, 2020, doi: 10.37985/joe.v1i2.18.
A. P. Satrianingrum and I. Prasetyo, “Persepsi Guru Dampak Pandemi Covid-19 terhadap Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Daring di PAUD,” J. Obs. J. Pendidik. Anak Usia Dini, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 633, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.31004/obsesi.v5i1.574.
J. W. Creswell, Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, And Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Pearson, 2015.
W. Li and W. A. Renandya, “Effective approaches to teaching listening: Chinese EFL teachers’ perspectives,” J. Asia TEFL, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 79–111, 2012.
W. Ng, “Can we teach digital natives digital literacy?,” Comput. Educ., vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 1065–1078, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016.
D. Wild et al., “Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: Report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation,” Value Heal., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 94–104, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x.
M. M. Hennink, Focus group discussions. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.
J. Arifin, SPSS Untuk Penelitian dan Skripsi. Elex Media Komputindo, 2018.
W. J. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative adn Mixed Methods Approaches. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, 2018.
G. Falloon, “From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 2449–2472, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4.
K. F. Hew and T. Brush, “Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 223–252, May 2007, doi: 10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5.
J. Poushter, “Smartphone Ownership and Internet Usage Continues to Climb in Emerging Economies,” 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2016/02/22/smartphone-ownership-and-internet-usage-continues-to-climb-in-emerging-economies/.
M. S. Khan, M. Hasan, and C. K. Clement, “BARRIERS TO THE INTRODUCTION OF ICT INTO EDUCATION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: THE EXAMPLE OF BANGLADESH,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 5, no. 2, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2012_2_5.pdf.
Authors who publish with this Journal agree to the following terms:
- Author retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a creative commons attribution license that allow others to share the work within an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication of this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangement for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g. acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal).
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their websites) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published works.