CLUSTER FAST DOUBLE BOOTSTRAP APPROACH WITH RANDOM EFFECT SPATIAL MODELING

  • Wigbertus Ngabu Department Statistics, Faculty Mathematics and Science, Brawijaya University, Indonesia
  • Rahma Fitriani Department Statistics, Faculty Mathematics and Science, Brawijaya University, Indonesia
  • Henny Pramoedyo Department Statistics, Faculty Mathematics and Science, Brawijaya University, Indonesia
  • Ani Budi Astuti Department Statistics, Faculty Mathematics and Science, Brawijaya University, Indonesia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30598/barekengvol17iss2pp0945-0954
Keywords: Fast Double Bootstrap, Random effect, Poverty, SAR

Abstract

Panel data is a combination of cross-sectional and time series data. Spatial panel analysis is an analysis to obtain information based on observations affected by the space or location effects. The effect of location effects on spatial analysis is presented in the form of weighting. The use of panel data in spatial regression provides a number of advantages, however, the spatial dependence test and parameter estimators generated in the spatial regression of data panel will be inaccurate when applied to areas with a small number of spatial units. One method to overcome the problem of small spatial unit size is the bootstrap method. This study used the fast double bootstrap (FDB) method by modeling the poverty rate in the Flores islands. The data used in the study was sourced from the BPS NTT Province website. The results of Hausman test show that the right model is Random effect. The spatial dependence test concludes that there is a spatial dependence and the poverty modeling in the Flores islands tends to use the SAR model. SAR random effect model R2 shows the value of 77.38 percent and it does not meet the assumption of normality. Spatial Autoregressive Random effect model with the Fast Double Bootstrap approach is able to explain the diversity of poverty rate in the Flores Island by 99.83 percent and fulfilling the assumption of residual normality. The results of the analysis using the FDB approach on the spatial panel show better results than the common spatial panel.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

L. Anselin, “Spatial econometrics,” Handb. Spat. Anal. Soc. Sci., pp. 101–122, 2022.

F. Belotti, G. Hughes, and A. P. Mortari, “Spatial panel-data models using Stata,” Stata J., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 139–180, 2017.

J. LeSage, “Spatial econometrics,” in Handbook of research methods and applications in economic geography, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015, pp. 23–40.

T. Ren, Z. Long, R. Zhang, and Q. Chen, “Moran’s I test of spatial panel data model—Based on bootstrap method,” Econ. Model., vol. 41, pp. 9–14, 2014.

J. G. MacKinnon and M. D. Webb, “Wild bootstrap inference for wildly different cluster sizes,” J. Appl. Econom., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 233–254, 2017.

V. Mameli, M. Musio, and L. Ventura, “Bootstrap adjustments of signed scoring rule root statistics,” Commun. Stat. Comput., vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 1204–1215, 2018.

R. Davidson and A. Monticini, “An Improved Fast Double Bootstrap,” 2019.

Z. Long and B. Ou, “Bootstrap LM-lag test for spatial dependence in panel data models,” vol. 29, no. Iemss, pp. 691–694, 2017, doi: 10.2991/iemss-17.2017.138.

W. L. Chou, S. Z. Ng, and Y. Yang, “Panel data analysis and bootstrapping: Application to China mutual funds,” Handb. Financ. Econom. Stat., pp. 657–668, 2015, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-7750-1_24.

I. A. Canay, A. Santos, and A. M. Shaikh, “The wild bootstrap with a ‘small’ number of ‘large’ clusters,” Rev. Econ. Stat., vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 346–363, 2021.

J.-E. Choi and D. W. Shin, “Block bootstrapping for a panel mean break test,” J. Korean Stat. Soc., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 802–821, 2020.

B. Ou, Z. Long, and W. Li, “Bootstrap LM Tests for Spatial Dependence in Panel Data Models with Fixed Effects,” J. Syst. Sci. Inf., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 330–343, 2019.

F. Yanuar, H. Yozza, F. Firdawati, I. Rahmi, and A. Zetra, “Applying bootstrap quantile regression for the construction of a low birth weight model,” Makara J. Heal. Res., vol. 23, no. 2, p. 5, 2019.

A. F. Galvao, T. Parker, and Z. Xiao, “Bootstrap inference for panel data quantile regression,” arXiv Prepr. arXiv2111.03626, 2021.

J. G. MacKinnon, M. Ø. Nielsen, and C. M. D. Webb, “Fast and wild: Bootstrap inference in Stata using boottest,” Queen’s Univ. Econ. Dep. Work. Pap., no. 1406, 2018.

J. P. Elhorst, “Spatial Panel Data Analysis.,” Encycl. GIS, vol. 2, pp. 2050–2058, 2017.

J. P. Elhorst, Spatial econometrics from cross-sectional data to spatial panels. Springer, 2014.

Published
2023-06-11
How to Cite
[1]
W. Ngabu, R. Fitriani, H. Pramoedyo, and A. Astuti, “CLUSTER FAST DOUBLE BOOTSTRAP APPROACH WITH RANDOM EFFECT SPATIAL MODELING”, BAREKENG: J. Math. & App., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 0945-0954, Jun. 2023.
Issue
Vol 17 No 2 (2023): BAREKENG: Journal of Mathematics and Its Applications
Section
Articles

Copyright (c) 2023 Wigbertus Ngabu, Rahma Fitriani, Henny Pramoedyo, Ani Budi Astuti

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this Journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Author retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a creative commons attribution license that allow others to share the work within an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication of this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangement for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g. acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal).
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their websites) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published works.