EVALUATION AND USER INTERFACE DESIGN IMPROVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE IMMIGRATION SERVICE APPLICATION USING DESIGN THINKING

  • Alexander Ryan Hendarto Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Airlangga University, Indonesia
  • Indah Werdiningsih Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Airlangga University, Indonesia
  • Kartono Kartono Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Airlangga University, Indonesia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30598/barekengvol18iss1pp0001-0018
Keywords: Design Thinking, Immigration Service, M-Paspor, Mobile Application, User Experience, User Interface

Abstract

The M-Paspor application is an immigration service application. It is an application that is officially managed by the Directorate General of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia. With this online service system, people who wish to apply for passports do not need to come to the office and stand in line to make passports, now they only need to access the Directorate General of Immigration's website or this mobile-based application to submit an application. This study aims to evaluate and provide recommendations for user interface improvements that can be proposed to improve the user experience of the M-Paspor application. This research used the design thinking method. Design thinking itself consists of five stages, namely empathy, define, idea, prototype, and test. Some of the problems in the user experience of the M-Paspor application are the confusing flow and interface, the loading process takes too long, the information guide is not informative, the display is boring and inconsistent. The user experience of the M-Paspor application has been tested with 15 respondents through five usability test task scenarios. The test results shown that the average aspect of effectiveness is 100%, the average aspect of efficiency is 0.133 goals/second with a range of 0.197 goals/second, and the average aspect of user satisfaction is 5.1 with a range of 2.4 (from a scale of 1 to 7).

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. E. Budi and E. F. Jasjfi, “Kajian Peranan Desain Ux ( Pengalaman Pengguna ) - Ui ( Antar Muka Penguna ) Mobile Application Kategori Transportasi Online Terhadap Gaya Hidup Bertransportasi Masyarakat Urban,” J. Seni dan Reka Ranc., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 181–207, 2018.

W. Chmielarz, M. Zborowski, M. Atasever, and A. Fandrejewska, “Smartphone and Mobile Applications Usage . Comparison Poland- Smartphone and Mobile Applications Turkey Usage . Comparison Poland-,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 192, pp. 1369–1384, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.08.140.

M. Strenitzerova and K. Stalmachova, “Customer requirements for urban public transport mobile application,” Transp. Res. Procedia, vol. 55, no. 2019, pp. 95–102, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2021.06.010.

D. Zhang, “Challenges , Methodologies , and Issues in the Usability Testing of Mobile Applications,” Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 293–308, 2005.

D. Imigrasi, Buku Panduan Aplikasi Layanan Paspor Online. 2021.

Rayadi, “Sistem informasi pelayanan paspor republik indonesia,” Integr. J., vol. 5, pp. 13–20, 2015.

O. Al-shamaileh and A. Sutcliffe, “Why people choose Apps : An evaluation of the ecology and user experience of mobile applications,” Int. J. Hum. - Comput. Stud., vol. 170, no. March 2022, p. 102965, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102965.

I. Engineering, U. Indonesia, and A. Suzianti, “User Interface Redesign of Dental Clinic ERP System using Design Thinking : A Case Study,” pp. 193–197, 2019.

H. W. Alomari, V. Ramasamy, J. D. Kiper, and G. Potvin, “A User Interface ( UI ) and User eXperience ( UX ) evaluation framework for cyberlearning environments in computer science and software engineering education,” Heliyon, vol. 6, no. November 2019, p. e03917, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03917.

L. A. M. Zaina, R. P. M. Fortes, V. Casadei, L. Seiji, D. Maria, and B. Paiva, “Preventing accessibility barriers : Guidelines for using user interface design patterns in mobile applications ✩,” J. Syst. Softw., vol. 186, p. 111213, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.111213.

S. Hsiao, C. Lee, M. Yang, and R. Chen, “User interface based on natural interaction design for seniors,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 75, pp. 147–159, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.011.

F. Calisir, E. Cevikcan, H. C. Akdag, and I. A. Areas, Industrial Engineering in the Big Data Era. 2018.

B. H. Mass, E. Horizon, T. Collaboration, and K. Akiyama, “Analysis of User Interface and User Experience on Comrades Application Analysis of User Interface and User Experience on Comrades Application,” in Material Science and Engineering, 2018. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/407/1/012127.

H. Ji, Y. Yun, S. Lee, K. Kim, and H. Lim, “An adaptable UI / UX considering user ’ s cognitive and behavior information in distributed environment,” Cluster Comput., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1045–1058, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10586-017-0999-9.

P. Liu, Z. Jiang, T. Li, G. Wang, R. Wang, and Z. Xu, “User experience and usability when the automated driving system fails : Findings from a field experiment,” Accid. Anal. Prev., vol. 161, no. July, p. 106383, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106383.

N. Bevan, J. Carter, J. Earthy, T. Geis, and S. Harker, “What are user requirements ? Developing an ISO standard”.

K. Vincent, M. Daly, C. Scannell, and B. Leathes, “What can climate services learn from theory and practice of co-production ?,” Clim. Serv., vol. 12, no. July, pp. 48–58, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.cliser.2018.11.001.

B. A. Kumar, “Usability heuristics for mobile learning applications,” pp. 1819–1833, 2019.

B. A. Kumar, “Usability of mobile learning applications : a systematic literature review,” J. Comput. Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s40692-017-0093-6.

D. De Paula, “Design Thinking in Practice : Understanding Manifestations of Design Thinking in Software Engineering,” pp. 1059–1069, 2019.

H. Traifeh, R. Bin Tareaf, R. A. Refaie, and C. Meinel, “How Did Design Thinking Develop in the Arab Word ? Finding from Twitter Analysis,” vol. 19, no. April, 2022, doi: 10.22059/JDT.2022.312803.1063.

R. Article and S. Panke, “Design Thinking in Education : Perspectives , Opportunities and Challenges,” no. 2018, pp. 281–306, 2019.

B. R. Dam and T. Siang, “What is Design Thinking and Why Is It So Popular ?”, 2018, [Online]. Tersedia: https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/what-is-design-thinking-and-why-is-it-so-popular [Diakses: Diakses pada 1 Februari 2022].

T. Brown, Design Thinking. 2008, Online]. Tersedia: https://hbr.org/2008/06/design-thinking [Diakses: 25 Maret 2022].

V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke Qualitative Psychology,” pp. 1–67.

A. Hulme, N. A. Stanton, G. H. Walker, P. Waterson, and P. M. Salmon, “What do applications of systems thinking accident analysis methods tell us about accident causation ? A systematic review of applications between 1990 and 2018,” Saf. Sci., vol. 117, no. March, pp. 164–183, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.04.016.

S. Hahn-goldberg et al., “Tool development to improve medication information transfer to patients during transitions of care : A participatory action research and design thinking methodology approach,” Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 2170–2177, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.04.002.

A. S. Denney and R. Tewksbury, “How to Write a Literature Review,” 2013.

E. Goodman and M. Kuniavsky, Observing the User Experience: A Practitioner’s Guide to User Research (Second Edition), vol. 56, no. 3. IEEE, 2013. doi: 10.1109/TPC.2013.2274110.

C. Lallemand, G. Gronier, and V. Koenig, “User experience : A concept without consensus ? Exploring practitioners ’ perspectives through an international survey,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 43, pp. 35–48, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.048.

H. M. Az-zahra, “Evaluating E-marketplace Mobile Application Based on People At the Center of Mobile Application Development ( PACMAD ) Usability Model,” pp. 72–77, 2019.

Published
2024-03-01
How to Cite
[1]
A. Hendarto, I. Werdiningsih, and K. Kartono, “EVALUATION AND USER INTERFACE DESIGN IMPROVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE IMMIGRATION SERVICE APPLICATION USING DESIGN THINKING”, BAREKENG: J. Math. & App., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 0001-0018, Mar. 2024.
Issue
Vol 18 No 1 (2024): BAREKENG: Journal of Mathematics and Its Application
Section
Articles

Copyright (c) 2024 Alexander Ryan Hendarto, Indah Werdiningsih, Kartono Kartono

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this Journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Author retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a creative commons attribution license that allow others to share the work within an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication of this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangement for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g. acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal).
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their websites) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published works.