A DYNAMIC HETEROGENEOUS NEXUS BETWEEN PADDY AND POVERTY: EVIDENCE FROM DUMITRESCU-HURLIN CAUSALITY AND PMG-ARDL

  • Mohamad Egi Destiartono Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, Diponegoro University, Indonesia
Keywords: PMG, Dumitrescu-Hurlin, Causality, Paddy, Poverty

Abstract

Agriculture is supposed to have a pivotal role in assisting poverty alleviation in Indonesia. Hence, this paper empirically examines the causal link between paddy productivity and poverty rates in Sumatra, retrieving balanced panel data from ten provinces for the period 2010-2022. Dumitrescu-Hurlin (DH) causality and Pooled Mean Group (PMG) methods are applied in order to reveal the causal direction and the elasticity under heterogeneous panel models. This paper integrates slope homogeneity, panel unit root, and panel cointegration tests. The results reveal that poverty rates and paddy productivity, are integrated in mixed order,  and , and they are cointegrated. The DH causality test denotes a unidirectional causality from paddy productivity toward poverty rates which implies the absence of a feedback effect. Following the PMG model, there is a positive impact of paddy productivity on poverty rates in the short run (∆β= 0.29); however, this linkage switches to become negative in the long run (β= -0.48). A 1% improvement in paddy productivity will be followed by a 0.48% reduction in poverty rates. Thus, augmenting paddy productivity has a favorable role in declining poverty rates. The estimated parameters of long-run PMG are robust, i.e., consistent with alternative methods of cointegrated regressions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Z. A. Abro, B. A. Alemu, and M. A. Hanjra, “Policies for Agricultural Productivity Growth and Poverty Reduction in Rural Ethiopia,” World Dev., vol. 59, pp. 461–474, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.01.033.

Almwd Hafi, “Agricultural Production and Economic Growth in Nigeria: Implication for Rural Poverty Alleviation,” Q. J. Int. Agric., vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 207–223, 2014, doi: 10.22004/ag.econ.195735.

S. Muthayya, J. D. Sugimoto, S. Montgomery, and G. F. Maberly, “An overview of global rice production, supply, trade, and consumption,” Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., vol. 1324, no. 1, pp. 7–14, Sep. 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12540.

R. Prasad, Y. S. Shivay, and D. Kumar, “Current Status, Challenges, and Opportunities in Rice Production BT - Rice Production Worldwide,” B. S. Chauhan, K. Jabran, and G. Mahajan, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp. 1–32. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-47516-5_1.

R. B. R. Firdaus, M. Leong Tan, S. R. Rahmat, and M. Senevi Gunaratne, “Paddy, rice and food security in Malaysia: A review of climate change impacts,” Cogent Soc. Sci., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 1818373, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1080/23311886.2020.1818373.

L. Christiaensen and W. Martin, “Agriculture, structural transformation and poverty reduction: Eight new insights,” World Dev., vol. 109, pp. 413–416, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.05.027.

A. Dhrifi, “Agricultural Productivity and Poverty Alleviation: What Role for Technological Innovation,” J. Econ. Soc. Stud., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 131–151, 2014, doi: 10.14706/jecoss11418.

M. R. Aprillya, E. Suryani, and A. Dzulkarnain, “System Dynamics Simulation Model to Increase Paddy Production for Food Security,” J. Inf. Syst. Eng. Bus. Intell., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 67, 2019, doi: 10.20473/jisebi.5.1.67-75.

P. S. Dalton, V. H. G. Jimenez, and C. N. Noussair, “Exposure to poverty and productivity,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2017, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170231.

J. Mariyono, “Rice production in Indonesia : policy and performance,” Asia Pacific J. Public Adm., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 123–134, 2014, doi: 10.1080/23276665.2014.911489.

S. W. Deski, S. Sartiyah, and C. Seftarita, “Investigating the Effect of Rice Commodity Price Volatility on Provincial Capital Poverty: An Evidence from Indonesia,” Int. J. Glob. Optim. Its Appl., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 90–99, 2022, doi: 10.56225/ijgoia.v1i2.18.

M. Ivanic and W. Martin, “Sectoral Productivity Growth and Poverty Reduction: National and Global Impacts,” World Dev., vol. 109, pp. 429–439, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.07.004.

O. O. Moses, E. J. Ongbele, and I. T. Rhoda, “ice Production and Poverty Reduction in Agatu Local Government Area of Benue State, Nigeria.” pp. 1–8, 2019. doi: 10.9734/ajaar/2019/v10i430037.

Rajindra, S. Jumiyati, and Irmawati, “Increasing production and income of rice farming: Keywords of food security and poverty alleviation,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 870, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/870/1/012021.

A. Arouna, J. C. Lokossou, M. C. S. Wopereis, S. Bruce-Oliver, and H. Roy-Macauley, “Contribution of improved rice varieties to poverty reduction and food security in sub-Saharan Africa,” Glob. Food Sec., vol. 14, no. March, pp. 54–60, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2017.03.001.

F. Victor Bekun and S. Saint Akadiri, “Poverty and Agriculture in Southern Africa Revisited: A Panel Causality Perspective,” SAGE Open, vol. 9, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1177/2158244019828853.

O. R. Tochukwu, W. D. Olanipekun, O. S. Omoyele, and T. A. Aderemi, “Agriculture, Food Security and Poverty Reduction in Nigeria: Cointegration and Granger Causality Approach,” Acta Univ. …, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 126–135, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://dj.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/AUDOE/article/view/1568

O. A. Matthew, R. Osabohien, T. O. Ogunlusi, and O. Edafe, “Agriculture and social protection for poverty reduction in ECOWAS,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 6, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2019.1682107.

A. Erlando, F. D. Riyanto, and S. Masakazu, “Financial inclusion, economic growth, and poverty alleviation: evidence from eastern Indonesia,” Heliyon, vol. 6, no. 10, p. e05235, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05235.

L. Nansadiqa, R. Masbar, and M. S. A. Majid, “EASJEBM_22_46-52_c_rkW2Udi,” East African Sch. J. Econ. Bus. Manag., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 46–51, 2019, doi: 10.36349/easjebm.2019.v02i0.

Akhmad and N. S. Marsuni, “Causality Relationship of Poverty , Unemployment Rate , and Economic Growth in South Sulawesi,” J. Ekon. Balanc., vol. 15, pp. 231–241, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://journal.unismuh.ac.id/index.php/jeb/article/view/3505

D. D. P. Sari, S. Sukanto, T. Marwa, and A. Bashir, “The Causality between Economic Growth, Poverty, and Stunting: Empirical evidence from Indonesia,” J. Perspekt. Pembiayaan dan Pembang. Drh., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 13–30, 2020, doi: 10.22437/ppd.v8i1.8834.

M. H. Pesaran and T. Yamagata, “Testing slope homogeneity in large panels,” J. Econom., vol. 142, no. 1, pp. 50–93, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010.

Z. Khan, S. Ali, M. Umar, D. Kirikkaleli, and Z. Jiao, “Consumption-based carbon emissions and International trade in G7 countries: The role of Environmental innovation and Renewable energy,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 730, p. 138945, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138945.

A. Safi, Y. Chen, S. Wahab, S. Ali, X. Yi, and M. Imran, “Financial Instability and Consumption-based Carbon Emission in E-7 Countries: The Role of Trade and Economic Growth,” Sustain. Prod. Consum., vol. 27, pp. 383–391, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.034.

J. Blomquist and J. Westerlund, “Testing slope homogeneity in large panels with serial correlation,” Econ. Lett., vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 374–378, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2013.09.012.

K. S. Im, M. H. Pesaran, and Y. Shin, “Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels,” J. Econom., vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 53–74, 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7.

U. Al-Mulali, C. F. Tang, and I. Ozturk, “Estimating the Environment Kuznets Curve hypothesis: Evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean countries,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 50, pp. 918–924, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.017.

K. Dong, R. Sun, G. Hochman, X. Zeng, H. Li, and H. Jiang, “Impact of natural gas consumption on CO2 emissions: Panel data evidence from China’s provinces,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 162, pp. 400–410, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.100.

P. Pedroni, “Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis,” Econom. Theory, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 597–625, 2004, doi: 10.1017/S0266466604203073.

T. Neal, “Panel cointegration analysis with xtpedroni,” Stata J., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 684–692, 2014, doi: 10.1177/1536867x1401400312.

E. I. Dumitrescu and C. Hurlin, “Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels,” Econ. Model., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1450–1460, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014.

S. H. Hashmi, H. Fan, Y. Habib, and A. Riaz, “Non-linear relationship between urbanization paths and CO2 emissions: A case of South, South-East and East Asian economies,” Urban Clim., vol. 37, no. February, p. 100814, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100814.

M. E. Destiartono and D. Hartono, “Does Rapid Urbanization Drive Deforestation ? Evidence From Southeast Asia,” Econ. Dev. Anal. J., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 442–453, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/edaj/article/view/58870

B. A. Ajanaku and A. R. Collins, “Economic growth and deforestation in African countries: Is the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis applicable?,” For. Policy Econ., vol. 129, p. 102488, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102488.

L. Lopez and S. Weber, “Testing for Granger causality in panel data,” Stata J., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 972–984, 2017, doi: 10.1177/1536867X1801700412.

M. H. Pesaran, Y. Shin, R. P. Smith, and M. Hashem, “Pooled Mean Group Estimation of Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels,” Source J. Am. Stat. Assoc., vol. 94, no. 446, pp. 621–634, 1999, Accessed: Jun. 10, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.2307/2670182

M. A. Malik and T. Masood, “Dynamics of Output Growth and Convergence in the Middle East and North African Countries: Heterogeneous Panel ARDL Approach,” J. Knowl. Econ., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1444–1469, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s13132-021-00780-3.

I. Attiaoui, H. Toumi, B. Ammouri, and I. Gargouri, “Causality links among renewable energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth in Africa: evidence from a panel ARDL-PMG approach,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 24, no. 14, pp. 13036–13048, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-8850-7.

K. Sohag, A. B. Nabilah, and R. A. Begum, “Dynamic impact of financial development on economic growth: Heterogeneous panel data analysis of island economies,” Int. J. Econ. Policy Emerg. Econ., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 77–95, 2015, doi: 10.1504/IJEPEE.2015.068249.

D. R. Safitri and E. D. Sihaloho, “Lumbung Padi Indonesia dan Kemiskinan : Studi Kasus Kabupaten Kota di Jawa Timur,” Ekon. J. Econ. Bus., vol. 4, no. September 2018, pp. 56–61, 2020, doi: 10.33087/ekonomis.v4i1.109.

Published
2023-12-19
How to Cite
[1]
M. Destiartono, “A DYNAMIC HETEROGENEOUS NEXUS BETWEEN PADDY AND POVERTY: EVIDENCE FROM DUMITRESCU-HURLIN CAUSALITY AND PMG-ARDL”, BAREKENG: J. Math. & App., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 2225-2234, Dec. 2023.