COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN AHP MOORA AND AHP-ELECTRE METHOD FOR OPTIMAL ELECTRIC AND SOLAR-POWERED SHIPYARD SITE SELECTION

  • Ade Ratih Ispandiari Research Center for Transportation Technology, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Indonesia
  • Nanda Yustina Research Center for Transportation Technology, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Indonesia
  • Zulfa Qonita Research Center for Geological Disaster, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Indonesia
  • Nurul Shabrina Research Center for Transportation Technology, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Indonesia
  • Nanda Itohasi Gutami Research Center for Transportation Technology, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Indonesia
  • Annissa Rochyntawati Research Center for Transportation Technology, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Indonesia
  • Iskendar Iskendar Research Center for Transportation Technology, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Indonesia
Keywords: MCDM, AHP-MOORA, AHP-ELECTRE, Shipyard, Site selection

Abstract

Transportation is the second largest emitter of CO2 in the world, accounting for 25% of total CO2 emissions. To achieve a zero-carbon shipping industry, Indonesia can use its high sun exposure to generate electrical energy by using solar cell technology, which converts solar energy into electrical power. To answer the challenge, this research will start with the site selection of electric and solar-powered shipyards. This research tries to solve the problem of selecting the best location for electric and solar-powered shipyards by using the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method. The purpose of this research is to get the optimal location of electric and solar shipyards using AHP-MOORA and AHP-ELECTRE methods. There are three alternative locations in the location selection. Alternatives 1 and 3 are in Paciran District, Lamongan Regency, East Java Province, and alternative 2 is in Serang Regency, Banten Province. Alternative site 1 has an area of 38 ha and is located in Sidokelar Village, Paciran Sub-district. Decision-makers determine the parameters that will be evaluated from each alternative location, such as slope, soil type, rainfall, and 18 other criteria. In determining the weighting of parameters, a method that has a consistency test is needed so that the weight results obtained are consistent and objective. The study result shows that alternative location 1 is the best location for the electric and solar-powered shipbuilding industry, the same conclusion using the AHP-MOORA Integration approach and the AHP weighting ELECTRE Integration approach.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

UN environment programme, “The Closing Window Climate crisis calls for rapid transformation of societies,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.unep.org/emissions-gap-report-2022

International Maritime Organization, “Fourth IMO GHG Study 2020 Full Report,” 2020.

IMO, MEPC.304(72) - Initial IMO Strategy on Reduction of GHG Emissions from Ships. IMO, 2018.

I. Purwanto, “SOLAR CELL(PHOTOVOLTAIC/PV) SOLUSI MENUJU PULAU MANDIRI LISTRIK,” 2020.

Sudiyono and B. Antoko, “Perancangan dan Pembuatan Kapal Wisata dengan Motor Generator Listrik Tenaga Surya Sebagai Energi Alternatif Penggerak Propeler,” JURNAL TEKNIK MESIN, pp. 52–62, 2008.

S. Haidir, S. R. W. Pribadi, and I. Baihaqi, “Analisa Kemampuan Galangan Kapal di Indonesia untuk Membangun Kapal Tol Laut dalam Mendukung Penerapan Kebijakan Poros Maritim,” JURNAL TEKNIK ITS, vol. 4, 2015.

A. G. Koumentakos, “Developments in electric and green marine ships,” Applied System Innovation, vol. 2, no. 4. MDPI AG, pp. 1–21, Dec. 01, 2019. doi: 10.3390/asi2040034.

G. Sulligoi, A. Vicenzutti, and R. Menis, “All-electric ship design: From electrical propulsion to integrated electrical and electronic power systems,” IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 507–521, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.1109/TTE.2016.2598078.

M. Koray, “Prioritizing Shipyard Conversion Requirements Regarding Green Ship and Green Shipyard Concept,” in International Maritime Science Conference, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372991609

S. Wankhede, P. Pesode, S. Pawar, and R. Lobo, “Comparison Study Of GRA, COPRAS And MOORA For Ranking Of Phase Change Material For Cooling System,” Mater Today Proc, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.02.437.

W. K. M. Brauers and E. K. Zavadskas, “The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy,” in Control and Cybernetics, 2006, pp. 445–469.

B. Roy, “The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods,” Theory Decis, vol. 31, pp. 49–73, 1991.

Nuraini, “Analysis of decision support using Elimination and Choice Expressing Reality (ELECTRE) method in determining best candidate for Programmer position,” Procedia Comput Sci, vol. 216, pp. 571–579, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.171.

T. L. Saaty, “THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY AND ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESSES FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF INTANGIBLE CRITERIA AND FOR DECISION-MAKING,” 2016.

Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill International Book Co, 1980.

J. Figueira, S. Greco, and M. Ehrgott, MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS: STATE OF THE ART SURVEYS. Boston/Dordrecht/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2005.

A. C. Febryanti, I. Darmawan, and R. Andreswari, “PEMBOBOTAN KRITERIA SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMILIHAN BIDANG PEMINATAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (STUDI KASUS: PROGRAM STUDI SISTEM INFORMASI UNIVERSITAS TELKOM) 1,” Jurnal Rekayasa Sistem & Industri, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 7–15, 2016, doi: 10.25124/jrsi.v3i04.272.

A. V. Mangalan, S. Kuriakose, H. Mohamed, and A. Ray, “Optimal Location of Warehouse Using Weighted MOORA Approach,” International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, and Optimization Techniques (ICEEOT), 2016.

A. Cahyapratama and R. Sarno, “Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Methods In Singer Selection Process,” in International Conference on Information and Communications Technology (ICOIACT), International Conference on Information and Communications Technology (ICOIACT), 2018.

A. Parkhan and A. D. Vatimbing, “Integration AHP and TOPSIS in Shipyard Location Selection,” in 5th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications, 2018.

K. Fatema, M. A. H. Rony, N. Zahan, and M. Z. Hasan, “A Multi-attribute Decision Making Approach for Trauma Center Site Selection,” in 2021 12th International Conference on Computing Communication and Networking Technologies, ICCCNT 2021, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2021. doi: 10.1109/ICCCNT51525.2021.9579889.

R. Kumar, Prinshu, A. Kumar Mishra, S. Dutta, and A. Kumar Singh, “Optimization and prediction of response characteristics of electrical discharge machining using AHP-MOORA and RSM,” Mater Today Proc, vol. 80, pp. 333–338, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.02.138.

R. M. Cardoso et al., “Qualitative evaluation of pharmaceuticals and metabolites in hospital effluent: Influence of sample preparation technique and outranking by environmental risk using the ELECTRE method,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 834, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155119.

S. Daimi and S. Rebai, “Sustainability performance assessment of Tunisian public transport companies: AHP and ANP approaches,” Socioecon Plann Sci, vol. 89, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2023.101680.

S. Prahesti, D. E. Ratnawati, and H. Nurwasito, “Sistem Rekomendasi Pemilihan SMA Metode AHP-ELECTRE Dan SAW,” Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer (JTIIK), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 25–30, 2017.

J. Figueira and B. Roy, “Decision Aiding Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos’ procedure,” Eur J Oper Res, vol. 139, pp. 317–326, 2002, [Online]. Available: www.elsevier.com/locate/dsw

L. Yu, “Research on evaluation index of green campus based on AHP method,” in Proceedings - 2016 International Conference on Intelligent Transportation, Big Data and Smart City, ICITBS 2016, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., Sep. 2017, pp. 249–252. doi: 10.1109/ICITBS.2016.25.

M. Akram, K. Zahid, and M. Deveci, “Multi-criteria group decision-making for optimal management of water supply with fuzzy ELECTRE-based outranking method,” Appl Soft Comput, vol. 143, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110403.

Q. Xu and Xiong M, “A Method for Improving Consistency of Judgment Matrix in the AHP,” in In: 2nd Asia-Pacific Conference on Intelligent Robot Systems, 2017.

R. Morgan, “An investigation of constraints upon fisheries diversification using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP),” Mar Policy, vol. 86, pp. 24–30, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.05.037.

T. L. Saaty and J. M. Katz, “How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process,” 1990.

S. Riahi, A. Bahroudi, M. Abedi, D. R. Lentz, and S. Aslani, “Application of data-driven multi-index overlay and BWM-MOORA MCDM methods in mineral prospectivity mapping of porphyry Cu mineralization,” J Appl Geophy, vol. 213, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2023.105025.

Published
2023-12-19
How to Cite
[1]
A. Ispandiari, “COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN AHP MOORA AND AHP-ELECTRE METHOD FOR OPTIMAL ELECTRIC AND SOLAR-POWERED SHIPYARD SITE SELECTION”, BAREKENG: J. Math. & App., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 2381-2396, Dec. 2023.