CORRESPONDENCE ANALYSIS ON STATISTICAL LITERACY AND GENDER: EMBEDDING E-CAMPUS PLATFORM WITH RANDOM ASSIGNMENT OF MATCHED SUBJECT IN EXPLANATORY ANALYSIS

  • Karunia Eka Lestari Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1555-5933
  • Risnawita Risnawita Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, UIN Sjeh M. Djamil Djambek, Indonesia
  • Mokhammad Ridwan Yudhanegara Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang, Indonesia
  • Edwin Setiawan Nugraha Department of Actuarial Science, Faculty of Business, President University, Indonesia
  • Sisilia Sylviani Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Universitas Padjajaran, Indonesia
Keywords: Correspondence Analysis, E-campus Platform, Gender, Random Assignment, Statistical Literacy

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the embedding of e-campus platforms during the pandemic in dealing with gender disparities in statistical literacy and shed light on the association structure between statistical literacy and gender disparities. A mixed methods approach with sequential explanatory analysis was performed among 42 pairs (man-woman) sample of sophomore students enrolled in the Inferential Statistics course selected from a random assignment of matched subjects. The two main instruments, the placement test, and the statistical literacy test, were analyzed quantitatively using the Mann-Whitney test and correspondence analysis, followed by qualitative analysis using image and text analysis. The findings reveal that the e-campus platform has increased women's statistical literacy. Specifically, there is a statistically significant difference (1) between men's and women's statistical literacy scores, (2) an association between statistical literacy level and gender, and (3) different tendencies between men's and women's statistical literacy in various ways. The e-campus platform is an excellent solution for the teaching and learning process during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. Likewise, it can overcome gender disparities in literacy statistics. Since these findings lead to a higher statistical literacy rate for women than men, this could break the stereotype that women are less statistically literate than men.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

T. Murdiyanto, D. A. Wijayanti, N. F. Maula, and A. Sovia, “‘In-Math’ as a Website-Based e-Learning Media in the Endemic Era,” Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2023, doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.1.1773.

M. R. Yudhanegara and K. E. Lestari, “Network Clustering Method for Preventing the Spread of Covid-19 in Indonesian Schools,” Commun. Math. Biol. Neurosci., vol. 2023, pp. 1–15, 2023, doi: 10.28919/cmbn/7922.

J. M. Bystydzienski and S. R. Bird, “Removing barriers: Women in academic science, technology, engineering, and mathematics”, Am. J. Sociol., vol 114, no.4, pp.1231-1233, 2009, doi: 10.1086/599151.

O. Torres González, “The data on gender inequality in philosophy: The Spanish case,” Hypatia, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 646–666, 2020, doi: 10.1017/hyp.2020.39.

Y. Liu, “Use of mobile phones in the classroom by college students and their perceptions in relation to gender: A case study in china,” Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 320–326, 2020, doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.4.1383.

L. J. Sax et al., “Anatomy of an Enduring Gender Gap: The Evolution of Women’s Participation in Computer Science,” J. Higher Educ., vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 258–293, 2017, doi: 10.1080/00221546.2016.1257306.

D. Ramlah., Abadi, P., & Aisyah, “Digital Puzzle Worksheet for Identifying Metacognition Level of Students :,” Eur. J. Educ. Res., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 795–810, 2023.

S. C. Hicks, “When Women in Statistics Come to Know Their Power,” Chance, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 4–5, 2014, doi: 10.1080/09332480.2014.988947.

J. Garfield, “The challenge of developing statistical reasoning,” J. Stat. Educ., vol. 10, no. 3, 2002, doi: 10.1080/10691898.2002.11910676.

N. Martin, J. Hughes, and J. Fugelsang, “The roles of experience, gender, and individual differences in statistical reasoning,” Stat. Educ. Res. J., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 454–475, 2017, doi: 10.52041/serj.v16i2.201.

D. S. Moore, “Statistical literacy and statistical competence in the 21st century,” In Presentation at the Joint Illinois-Purdue Statistics Colloquium, 2005.

I. Gal, “Adults’ statistical literacy: Meanings, components, responsibilities,” Int. Stat. Rev., vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 1–25, 2002, doi: 10.1111/j.1751-5823.2002.tb00336.x.

J. M. Watson, “Statistical Literacy at School,” Statistical Literacy at School. 2013, doi: 10.4324/9780203053898.

S. Sharma, “Definitions and models of statistical literacy: a literature review,” Open Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 118–133, 2017, doi: 10.1080/23265507.2017.1354313.

D. Ben-Zvi and J. Garfield, The Challenge of Developing Statistical Literacy, Reasoning, and Thinking. Kluwer Academic Publisher, 2004.

B. Đono, A. Delalić, A. Arnaut-Berilo, and M. Orlić, “Statistical Literacy as a Key Competency for Industry 4.0,” 2022.

R. Grant, “Statistical literacy in the data science workplace,” Stat. Educ. Res. J., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 17–21, 2017, doi: 10.52041/serj.v16i1.207.

S. Fallows and S. Christine, Integrating key skills in higher education: Employability, transferable skills and learning for life. Routledge, 2013.

A. Valentini, “Promoting and assessing statistical literacy among university students. The case of tuscany,” Electron. J. Appl. Stat. Anal., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 589–609, 2016, doi: 10.1285/i20705948v9n4p589.

H. Kerras, J. L. Sánchez-Navarro, E. I. López-Becerra, and M. D. de-Miguel Gómez, “The impact of the gender digital divide on sustainable development: Comparative analysis between the european union and the maghreb,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1–30, 2020, doi: 10.3390/SU12083347.

X. Qian, R. Nandakumar, J. Glutting, D. Ford, and S. Fifield, “Gender and Minority Achievement Gaps in Science in Eighth Grade: Item Analyses of Nationally Representative Data,” ETS Res. Rep. Ser., vol. 2017, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2017, doi: 10.1002/ets2.12164.

C. F. Yeap, N. Suhaimi, and M. K. M. Nasir, “Issues, Challenges, and Suggestions for Empowering Technical Vocational Education and Training Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Malaysia,” Creat. Educ., vol. 12, no. 08, pp. 1818–1839, 2021, doi: 10.4236/ce.2021.128138.

N. Wannapiroon, S. Shawarangkoon, C. Chawarangkoon, and A. Kucharoenthavorn, “Next Normal Education, Hybrid Learning Model for Active Imagineering Learning to Enhance Digital Innovator Competency,” Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 48–55, 2023, doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.1.1779.

S. Naidu, J. Lako, M. Karan, and A. Patel, “Education Smart Environments and Global e-Campus,” no. GovCon 2020, pp. 1–12, 2021, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-69902-8_127-1.

D. J. Rumsey, “Statistical literacy as a goal for introductory statistics courses,” J. Stat. Educ., vol. 10, no. 3, 2002, doi: 10.1080/10691898.2002.11910678.

J. W. Creswell, “Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative,” New Jersey, USA Pearson Educ. Inc., 2002.

J. R. Fraenkel, N. E. Wallen, and H. H. Hyun, How to design and evaluate research in education. 2012.

J. Watson and R. Callingham, “Statistical Literacy: a Complex Hierarchical Construct,” Stat. Educ. Res. J., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 3–46, 2003, doi: 10.52041/serj.v2i2.553.

N. V. Ivankova, J. W. Creswell, and S. L. Stick, “Using Mixed-Methods Sequential Explanatory Design: From Theory to Practice,” Field methods, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 3–20, 2006, doi: 10.1177/1525822X05282260.

M. Greenacre, Correspondence Analysis in Practice. Boca Raton: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, 2017.

K. E. Lestari, U. S. Pasaribu, S. W. Indratno, and H. Garminia, “The comparative analysis of dependence for three-way contingency table using Burt matrix and Tucker3 in correspondence analysis,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1245, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1245/1/012056.

E. J. Beh and R. Lombardo, Correspondence analysis theory, practice, and new strategies. Wess Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2014.

K. E. Lestari, U. S. Pasaribu, S. W. Indratno, and H. Garminia, “The Reliability of Crash Car Protection Level Based on the Circle Confidence Region on the Correspondence Plot,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 598, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/598/1/012061.

M. R. Yudhanegara and K. E. Lestari, “Clustering for multi-dimensional data set: A case study on educational data,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1280, no. 4, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1280/4/042025.

K. E. Lestari, U. S. Pasaribu, and S. W. Indratno, “Graphical depiction of three-way association in contingency table using higher-order singular value decomposition Tucker3,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1280, no. 2, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1280/2/022035.

K. E. Lestari, M. R. Utami, and M. R. Yudhanegara, “Simple Algorithm To Construct Circular Confidence Regions in Correspondence Analysis Using R,” BAREKENG J. Ilmu Mat. dan Terap., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 065–074, 2022, doi: 10.30598/barekengvol16iss1pp065-074.

K. E. Lestari, U. S. Pasaribu, S. W. Indratno, and H. Garminia, “Generating roots of cubic polynomials by Cardano’s approach on correspondence analysis,” Heliyon, vol. 6, no. 6, p. e03998, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03998.

K. E. Lestari, M. R. Utami, and M. R. Yudhanegara, “Sequential Exploratory Design by Performing Correspondence Analysis to Investigate Procedural Fluency of Undergraduate Student,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 2588, no. January, 2023, doi: 10.1063/5.0111974.

K. E. Lestari, M. R. Utami, and M. R. Yudhanegara, “Exploratory Analysis on Adaptive Reasoning of Undergraduate Student in Statistical Inference,” Int. J. Intruction, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 535–554, 2022, doi: 10.4135/9780857020123.n561.

J. Ritchie, J. Lewis, C. M. Nicholls, and R. Ormston, Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. SAGE, 2013.

A. Yolcu, “Middle school students’ statistical literacy: Role of grade level and gender,” Stat. Educ. Res. J., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 118–131, 2014, doi: 10.52041/serj.v13i2.285.

M. Yotongyos, D. Traiwichitkhun, and W. Kaemkate, “Undergraduate Students’ Statistical Literacy: A Survey Study,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 191, pp. 2731–2734, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.328.

L. Wirthwein, J. R. Sparfeldt, A. Heyder, S. R. Buch, D. H. Rost, and R. Steinmayr, “Sex differences in achievement goals: do school subjects matter?,” Eur. J. Psychol. Educ., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 403–427, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10212-019-00427-7.

D. T. Tempelaar, W. H. Gijselaers, and S. S. van der Loeff, “Puzzles in statistical reasoning,” J. Stat. Educ., vol. 14, no. 1, 2006, doi: 10.1080/10691898.2006.11910576.

Published
2024-08-02
How to Cite
[1]
K. Lestari, R. Risnawita, M. Yudhanegara, E. Nugraha, and S. Sylviani, “CORRESPONDENCE ANALYSIS ON STATISTICAL LITERACY AND GENDER: EMBEDDING E-CAMPUS PLATFORM WITH RANDOM ASSIGNMENT OF MATCHED SUBJECT IN EXPLANATORY ANALYSIS”, BAREKENG: J. Math. & App., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1975-1988, Aug. 2024.