Vol 19 No 4 (2025): BAREKENG: Journal of Mathematics and Its Application
Articles

COMPARISON OF SUPERVISED MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS IN HEART FAILURE DISEASE

PDF
  • Jauhara Rana Budiani,
  • Nur Mahmudah
Jauhara Rana Budiani
Study Program of Statistics, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sunan Giri, Indonesia
Nur Mahmudah
Study Program of Statistics, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sunan Giri, Indonesia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30598/barekengvol19iss4pp2739-2750
Published September 1, 2025
Keywords
  • Classification,
  • Disease Prediction,
  • Heart Failure,
  • Machine Learning
How to Cite
[1]
J. R. Budiani and N. Mahmudah, “COMPARISON OF SUPERVISED MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS IN HEART FAILURE DISEASE”, BAREKENG: J. Math. & App., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 2739-2750, Sep. 2025.

Copyright (c) 2025 Jauhara Rana Budiani, Nur Mahmudah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The heart is a vital organ in the human body that functions to pump blood throughout the body and to the lungs. The heart is located in the chest cavity. The heart is the main force that drives human life. Therefore, if there is a disturbance in heart function, this can cause a decrease in quality of life to death, one of which is heart failure. Heart failure, if not diagnosed and treated quickly, will result in death. Based on findings showing the high death rate due to heart failure, a classification is needed to predict heart failure using machine learning methods. Machine learning can help predict this disease to improve early detection and more accurate medical decision-making. This study focuses on predicting the likelihood of a patient experiencing heart failure. The machine learning algorithm method used is supervised machine learning classification, including decision trees, random forests, naïve bayes, SVM, and K-NN. The results showed that the best method for predicting heart failure was Random Forest with an accuracy of 74.35%, followed by SVM with an accuracy of 69.23%. Meanwhile, Naïve Bayes had the lowest accuracy of 51.28%. Based on these findings, Random Forest is recommended as the best method for heart failure prediction due to its ability to handle data complexity and provide more stable results. Once the best algorithm is obtained, the prediction results and early detection of heart failure will be more accurate.

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. I. M. Adhikara, “MENGENAL JANTUNG,” Direktorat Kajian dan Inovasi Akademik, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://mooc.ugm.ac.id/mengenal-jantung/#:~:text=Jantung%20adalah%20salah%20satu%20organ,seluruh%20tubuh%20dan%20paru%2Dparu.. [Accessed 19 November 2024].
  2. D. Sitompul, R. Hamonangan, D. J. Ziegel and E. Indra, “PERBANDINGAN ALGORITMA K-NEAREST NEIGHBORS (K-NN) DAN RANDOM FOREST TERHADAP PENYAKIT GAGAL JANTUNG,” Jurnal Teknlogi Informatika dan Komputer MH. Thamrin, Vols. 9, no. 1, p. 471–486, 2023. Doi: https://doi.org/10.37012/jtik.v9i1.1432
  3. WHO, “THE TOP 10 CAUSES OF DEATH,” 7 Agustus 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death. [Accessed 18 November 2024].
  4. Kemenkes, “SEHAT NEGERIKU,” 29 September 2022. [Online]. Available: https://sehatnegeriku.kemkes.go.id/baca/rilis-media/20220929/0541166/penyakit-jantung-penyebab-utama-kematian-kemenkes-perkuat-layanan-primer/. [Accessed 18 November 2024].
  5. Kemenkes, “KEMENKES HEBAT, INDONESIA SEHAT,” 23 September 2024. [Online]. Available: https://kemkes.go.id/id/rilis-kesehatan/kenali-gejala-jantung-sejak-dini. [Accessed 18 November 2024].
  6. A. Hartono, L. A. Dew, E. Yuniarti and S. T. H. Putri, “MACHINE LEARNING CLASSIFICATION FOR DETECTING HEART DISEASE WITH K-NN ALGORITHM, DECISION TREE AND RANDOM FOREST,” Eksakta: Berkala Ilmiah Bidang MIPA, vol. 24 NO 04, pp. 513-522, 2023.
  7. T. A. E. Putri, T. Widiharih and R. Santoso, “PENERAPAN TUNING HYPERPARAMETER RANDOMSEARCHCV PADA ADAPTIVE BOOSTING UNTUK PREDIKSI KELANGSUNGAN HIDUP PASIEN GAGAL JANTUNG,” JURNAL GAUSSIAN, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 397-406, 2022. Doi: https://doi.org/10.14710/j.gauss.11.3.397-406
  8. M. R. Alfaqih, C. Indianti and A. Z. Abidin, “HUBUNGAN KLASIFIKASI HIPERTENSI DENGAN PENYAKIT JANTUNG KORONER DI POLI JANTUNG RSUD DR. R. SOSODORO DJATIKOESOEMO BOJONEGORO,” Jurnal Ilmiah Keperawatan (Scientific Journal of Nursing), vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 514-521, 2024. Doi: https://doi.org/10.33023/jikep.v10i3.2289
  9. S. Y. Prasetyo, “PREDIKSI GAGAL JANTUNG MENGGUNAKAN ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK,” Jurnal Saintekom : Sains, Teknologi, Komputer dan Manajemen, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 79-88, 2023. Doi: https://doi.org/10.33020/saintekom.v13i1.379
  10. P. Purwono, P. Dewi, S. K. Wibisono and B. P. Dewa, “MODEL PREDIKSI OTOMATIS JENIS PENYAKIT HIPERTENSI DENGAN PEMANFAATAN ALGORITMA MACHINE LEARNING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK,” INSECT, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 82-90, 2022. Doi: https://doi.org/10.33506/insect.v7i2.1828
  11. R. Pranandito and Hendry, “PERBANDINGAN PREDIKSI PENYAKIT SERANGAN JANTUNG MENGGUNAKAN MODEL MACHINE LEARNING,” JIPI (Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Informatika) , vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1228-1237, 2023. Doi: https://doi.org/10.29100/jipi.v8i4.4165
  12. S. Adi and A. Wintarti, “KOMPARASI METODE SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE (SVM), K-NEAREST NEIGHBORS (KNN), DAN RANDOM FOREST (RF) UNTUK PREDIKSI PENYAKIT GAGAL JANTUNG,” MATHunesa Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika , vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 258-269, 2022. Doi: https://doi.org/10.26740/mathunesa.v10n2.p258-268
  13. I. Cholissodin, S. A. A. Soebroto, U. Hasanah and Y. I. Febiola, AI, MACHINE LEARNING & DEEP LEARNING (Teori & Implementasi), Malang: Fakultas Ilmu Komputer, 2020.
  14. D. Shah, S. Patel and S. K. Bharti, “HEART DISEASE PREDICTION USING MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES,” SN Computer Science, pp. 1-6, 2020.doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-020-00365-y
  15. R. N. Romadhon, A. Ogi and A. P. Agung, “IMPLEMENTASI ALGORITMA DECISION TREE UNTUK KLASIFIKASI PELANGGAN,” Karimah Tauhid, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1860-1874, 2024.doi: https://doi.org/10.30997/karimahtauhid.v3i2.11952
  16. C. Valsecchi, F. Grisoni, V. Consonni, D. Ballabio and R. Todeschini, MULTITASK LEARNING FOR QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE–ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIPS: A TUTORIAL. In: Hong, H. (eds) Machine Learning and Deep Learning in Computational Toxicology. Computational Methods in Engineering & the Sciences, Cham: Springer, 2023.doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20730-3_8
  17. Z. Masetic and . A. Subasi, “CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE DETECTION USING RANDOM FOREST CLASSIFIER,” Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2016.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.03.020
  18. A. Das, "LOGISTIC REGRESSION." ENCYCLOPEDIA OF QUALITY OF LIFE AND WELL-BEING RESEARCH, CHAM: SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING, 2024, pp. 3985-3986.doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_1689
  19. P. M. Fatima M., “SURVEY OF MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS FOR DISEASE DIAGNOSTIC,” J Intell Learn Syst Application, vol. 9, pp. 1-16, 2017.doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/jilsa.2017.91001
  20. B. Kim, “COMPARISON OF HEART FAILURE PREDICTION PERFORMANCE USING VARIOUS MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES,” International Journal of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication, vol. 16(4), pp. 290-300, 2024.
  21. M. K. Biddinika, A. Masitha, H. Herman and V. A. N. Fatimah, “MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES FOR HEART DISEASE PREDICTION USING A MULTI-ALGORITHM APPROACH,” JUITA: Jurnal Informatika , vol. 12(2), pp. 149-158, 2024. Doi: https://doi.org/10.30595/juita.v12i2.24153
  22. L. R. Safitri, N. Chamidah, T. Saifudin, M. Firmansyah and G. T. Alpandi, “COMPARISON OF LOGISTIC REGRESSION AND SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE IN PREDICTING STROKE RISK,” INFERENSI, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 123-128, July 2024.doi: https://doi.org/10.12962/j27213862.v7i2.20420
  23. M. Hamza and D. Larocque, “AN EMPIRICAL COMPARISON OF ENSEMBLE METHODS BASED ON CLASSIFICATION TREES,” Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, vol. 75, no. 8, p. 629–643, August 2005.doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00949650410001729472
  24. A. Damayunita, R. S. Fuadi and C. Juliane, “COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NAIVE BAYES, K-NEAREST NEIGHBORS (KNN), AND SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE (SVM) ALGORITHMS FOR CLASSIFICATION OF HEART DISEASE PATIENTS,” JOIN (Jurnal Online Informatika, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 219-225, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.15575/join.v7i2.919
  25. F. S. Alotaibi, “IMPLEMENTATION OF MACHINE LEARNING MODEL TO PREDICT HEART FAILURE DISEASE,” (IJACSA) International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, Vols. Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 261-268, 2019.doi: https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2019.0100637
  26. S. Xu, Z. Zhang, D. Wang, J. Hu, X. Duan and T. Zhu, “CARDIOVASCULAR RISK PREDICTION METHOD BASED ON CFS SUBSET EVALUATION AND RANDOM FOREST CLASSIFICATION FRAMEWORK,” in 2017 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Big Data Analysis , Beijing, 2017.doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBDA.2017.8078813
  27. A. Rahmah, N. Sepriyanti, M. H. Zikri, I. Ambarani and M. Y. bin Shahar, “IMPLEMENTATION OF SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE AND RANDOM FOREST FOR HEART FAILURE DISEASE CLASSIFICATION,” Public Research Journal of Engineering, Data Technology and Computer Science, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 34-40, 2023. Doi: https://doi.org/10.57152/predatecs.v1i1.816
  28. R. Baxani and M. Edinburgh, “Heart Disease Prediction Using Machine Learning Algorithms Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine and Random Forest Classification Techniques,” SSRN, July 1, 2022. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4151423
  29. U. K. Lilhore, P. Manoharan, J. K. Sandhu, S. Simaiya, S. Dalal, M. A. Baqasah, M. Alsafyani, R. Alroobaea, I. Keshta and K. Raahemifar, “HYBRID MODEL FOR PRECISE HEPATITIS-C CLASSIFICATION USING IMPROVED RANDOM FOREST AND SVM METHOD,” Scientifc Reports, Vols. vol. 13, no. 1, p. 1–18, 2023.doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36605-3