Vol 20 No 1 (2026): BAREKENG: Journal of Mathematics and Its Application
Articles

NEW CONJUGATE GRADIENT METHOD FOR ACCELERATED CONVERGENCE AND COMPUTATIONAL EFFICIENCY IN UNCONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS

Basim A. Hassan
Department of Mathematics, College of Computer Sciences and Mathematics, University of Mosul, Iraq
Alaa Luqman Ibrahim
College of Science, University of Zakho, Iraq
Thaair A. Ameen
Mosul University Presidency, University of Mosul, Iraq
Ibrahim Mohammed Sulaiman
Institute of Strategic Industrial Decision Modelling, School of Quantitative Sciences, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
Published November 24, 2025
Keywords
  • Conjugate gradient,
  • Global convergence,
  • Optimization,
  • Sufficient descent
How to Cite
[1]
B. A. Hassan, A. L. Ibrahim, T. A. Ameen, and I. M. Sulaiman, “NEW CONJUGATE GRADIENT METHOD FOR ACCELERATED CONVERGENCE AND COMPUTATIONAL EFFICIENCY IN UNCONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS”, BAREKENG: J. Math. & App., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 0481-0492, Nov. 2025.

Abstract

Conjugate gradient (CG) algorithms play an important role in solving large-scale unconstrained optimization problems due to their low memory requirements and strong convergence properties. However, many classical CG algorithms suffer from inefficiencies when dealing with complex or ill-conditioned objective functions. This paper addresses this challenge by proposing a new conjugate gradient method that combines the descent direction of traditional CG algorithms with Newton-type updates to improve convergence and computational efficiency. The proposed method is constructed to ensure sufficient descent at each iteration and global convergence under standard assumptions. By integrating the modified Newton update mechanism, the method effectively accelerates convergence without incurring the high computational cost typically associated with full Newton methods. To evaluate the performance of the proposed approach, we conducted extensive numerical experiments using a collection of well-known benchmark functions from the CUTEr test suite. The results show that the new method consistently outperforms the classical Hestenes-Stiefel method in terms of CPU time, number of function evaluations, and iteration count. These findings confirm the method’s potential as an efficient and robust alternative for solving large-scale unconstrained optimization problems.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. H. Akhadkulov, S. M. Noorani, A. B. Saaban, F. M. Alipiah, and H. Alsamir, “NOTES ON MULTIDIMENSIONAL FIXED-POINT THEOREMS,” Demonstr. Math., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 360–374, Dec. 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/dema-2017-0033
  2. H. Alsamir et al., “FIXED POINT RESULTS IN METRIC-LIKE SPACES VIA Σ-SIMULATION FUNCTIONS,” Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math., vol. 12, pp. 88–100, Jan. 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.29020/nybg.ejpam.v12i1.3331
  3. C. Luo, L. Wang, Y. Xie, and B. Chen, “A NEW CONJUGATE GRADIENT METHOD FOR MOVING FORCE IDENTIFICATION OF VEHICLE–BRIDGE SYSTEM,” J. Vib. Eng. Technol., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 19–36, Jan. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-022-00824-1
  4. Y. Yuan, D. H. K. Tsang, and V. K. N. Lau, “COMBINING CONJUGATE GRADIENT AND MOMENTUM FOR UNCONSTRAINED STOCHASTIC OPTIMIZATION WITH APPLICATIONS TO MACHINE LEARNING,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 11, no. 13, pp. 23236–23254, Jul. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2024.3376821
  5. S. B. Hanachi, B. Sellami, and M. Belloufi, “A NEW FAMILY OF HYBRID CONJUGATE GRADIENT METHOD FOR UNCONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION AND ITS APPLICATION TO REGRESSION ANALYSIS,” RAIRO - Oper. Res., vol. 58, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Jan. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2023196
  6. B. A. Hassan, I. A. R. Moghrabi, A. L. Ibrahim, and H. N. Jabbar, “IMPROVED CONJUGATE GRADIENT METHODS FOR UNCONSTRAINED MINIMIZATION PROBLEMS AND TRAINING RECURRENT NEURAL NETWORK,” Eng. Rep., vol. 7, no. 2, p. e70019, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.70019
  7. D. H. Omar, A. L. Ibrahim, M. M. Hassan, B. G. Fathi, and D. A. Sulaiman, “ENHANCED CONJUGATE GRADIENT METHOD FOR UNCONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION AND ITS APPLICATION IN NEURAL NETWORKS,” Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 2692–2705, Oct. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.29020/nybg.ejpam.v17i4.5354.
  8. B. A. Hassan and H. A. Alashoor, “ON IMAGE RESTORATION PROBLEMS USING NEW CONJUGATE GRADIENT METHODS,” Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 29, no. 3, p. 1438, Mar. 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v29.i3.pp1438-1445
  9. B. A. Hassan and H. Alashoor, “A NEW TYPE COEFFICIENT CONJUGATE ON THE GRADIENT METHODS FOR IMPULSE NOISE REMOVAL IN IMAGES,” Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 2043–2053, Oct. 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.29020/nybg.ejpam.v15i4.4579
  10. B. A. Hassan and A. A. Saad, “EXPLAINING NEW PARAMETERS CONJUGATE ANALYSIS BASED ON THE QUADRATIC MODEL,” J. Interdiscip. Math., vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1219–1229, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.47974/JIM-1620
  11. A. Muhammed Awwal, P. Kumam, K. Sitthithakerngkiet, A. Muhammad, A. Halilu, and S. Ibrahim, “DERIVATIVE-FREE METHOD BASED ON DFP UPDATING FORMULA FOR SOLVING CONVEX CONSTRAINED NONLINEAR MONOTONE EQUATIONS AND APPLICATION,” AIMS Math., vol. 6, pp. 8792–8814, Jun. 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2021510
  12. M. R. Hestenes and E. Stiefel, “METHODS OF CONJUGATE GRADIENTS FOR SOLVING LINEAR SYSTEMS,” J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand., vol. 49, no. 6, p. 409, Dec. 1952. doi: https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.049.044
  13. R. Fletcher and C. M. Reeves, “FUNCTION MINIMIZATION BY CONJUGATE GRADIENTS,” Comput. J., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 149–154, Jan. 1964. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/7.2.149
  14. S. G. Shareef and A. L. Ibrahim, “A NEW CONJUGATE GRADIENT FOR UNCONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION BASED ON STEP SIZE OF BARZILAI AND BORWEIN,” Sci. J. Univ. Zakho, vol. 4, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Jun. 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.25271/2016.4.1.29
  15. B. A. Hassan and A. Ahmed A. Abdullah, “IMPROVEMENT OF CONJUGATE GRADIENT METHODS FOR REMOVING IMPULSE NOISE IMAGES,” Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 29, no. 1, p. 245, Jan. 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v29.i1.pp245-251
  16. J. Sabi’u, S. Ibrahim, P. Kaelo, M. Malik, and S. Kamaruddin, “AN OPTIMAL CHOICE DAI-LIAO CONJUGATE GRADIENT ALGORITHM FOR UNCONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION AND PORTFOLIO SELECTION,” AIMS Math., vol. 9, pp. 642–664, Jan. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2024034
  17. J. K. Liu and S. J. Li, “NEW HYBRID CONJUGATE GRADIENT METHOD FOR UNCONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION,” Appl. Math. Comput., vol. 245, pp. 36–43, Oct. 2014. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2014.07.096
  18. B. A. Hassan, I. A. R. Moghrabi, T. A. Ameen, R. M. Sulaiman, and I. M. Sulaiman, “IMAGE NOISE REDUCTION AND SOLUTION OF UNCONSTRAINED MINIMIZATION PROBLEMS VIA NEW CONJUGATE GRADIENT METHODS,” Mathematics, vol. 12, no. 17, Art. no. 17, Jan. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/math12172754
  19. Z. Salleh and A. Alhawarat, “AN EFFICIENT MODIFICATION OF THE HESTENES-STIEFEL NONLINEAR CONJUGATE GRADIENT METHOD WITH RESTART PROPERTY,” J. Inequalities Appl., vol. 2016, no. 1, p. 110, Apr. 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-016-1049-5
  20. G. Yuan, Wei ,Zengxin, and Q. and Zhao, “A MODIFIED POLAK–RIBIÈRE–POLYAK CONJUGATE GRADIENT ALGORITHM FOR LARGE-SCALE OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS,” IIE Trans., vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 397–413, Apr. 2014. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0740817X.2012.726757
  21. Z. Wei, G. Li, and L. Qi, “NEW NONLINEAR CONJUGATE GRADIENT FORMULAS FOR LARGE-SCALE UNCONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS,” Appl. Math. Comput., vol. 179, no. 2, pp. 407–430, Aug. 2006. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2005.11.150
  22. B. A. Hassan, M. Alnaimy, S. Ibrahim, and A. Abubakar, AN ALTERNATIVE MODIFIED QUASI-NEWTON EQUATION FOR SOLVING UNCONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS. 2022, p. 205. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/IT-ELA57378.2022.10107966
  23. P. Wolfe, “CONVERGENCE CONDITIONS FOR ASCENT METHODS. II: SOME CORRECTIONS,” SIAM Rev., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 185–188, Apr. 1971. doi: https://doi.org/10.1137/1013035
  24. P. Wolfe, “CONVERGENCE CONDITIONS FOR ASCENT METHODS,” SIAM Rev., Jul. 2006. doi: https://doi.org/10.1137/1011036
  25. L. Nazareth, “A CONJUGATE DIRECTION ALGORITHM WITHOUT LINE SEARCHES,” J. Optim. Theory Appl., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 373–387, Nov. 1977. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00933447
  26. B. A. Hassan and A. A. Saad, “ELASTIC CONJUGATE GRADIENT METHODS TO SOLVE ITERATION PROBLEMS,” J. Interdiscip. Math., vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1207–1217, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.47974/JIM-1619
  27. N. I. M. Gould, D. Orban, and P. L. Toint, “CUTER AND SIFDEC: A CONSTRAINED AND UNCONSTRAINED TESTING ENVIRONMENT, REVISITED,” ACM Trans Math Softw, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 373–394, Dec. 2003, doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/962437.962439
  28. N. Andrei, “AN UNCONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION TEST FUNCTIONS COLLECTION,” 2008. Accessed: Feb. 26, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/An-Unconstrained-Optimization-Test-Functions-Andrei/3bcfd42ec838188f3366d75d3568c0638a79c8c4
  29. J. J. Moré, B. S. Garbow, and K. E. Hillstrom, “TESTING UNCONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION SOFTWARE,” ACM Trans Math Softw, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 17–41, Mar. 1981. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/355934.355936
  30. E. D. Dolan and J. J. Moré, “BENCHMARKING OPTIMIZATION SOFTWARE WITH PERFORMANCE PROFILES,” Math. Program., vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 201–213, Jan. 2002. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s101070100263
  31. B. A. Hassan and H. M. Sadiq, “A NEW FORMULA ON THE CONJUGATE GRADIENT METHOD FOR REMOVING IMPULSE NOISE IMAGES”, Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Ser. Mathematical Modelling, Programming & Computer Software (Bulletin SUSU MMCS), 2022, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 123-130. doi: https://doi.org/10.14529/mmp220412
  32. B. A. Hassan and H. Sadiq, “Efficient new conjugate gradient methods for removing impulse noise images”. European Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 15(4), 2011–2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.29020/nybg.ejpam.v15i4.4568