Vol 20 No 1 (2026): BAREKENG: Journal of Mathematics and Its Application
Articles

ANALYSIS OF APRIORI AND K-NEAREST NEIGHBOR (KNN) ALGORITHM IN RECOMMENDING APPROPRIATE LEARNING METHOD

Nuril Lutvi Azizah
Informatics Department, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Ade Eviyanti
Informatics Department, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Novia Ariyanti
Informatics Department, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Gita Wardani
Informatics Department, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Naila Farah Diba
Informatics Department, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Published November 24, 2025
Keywords
  • Apriori algorithm,
  • Classification,
  • K-Nearest neighbor,
  • Learning methods
How to Cite
[1]
N. L. Azizah, A. Eviyanti, N. Ariyanti, G. Wardani, and N. F. Diba, “ANALYSIS OF APRIORI AND K-NEAREST NEIGHBOR (KNN) ALGORITHM IN RECOMMENDING APPROPRIATE LEARNING METHOD”, BAREKENG: J. Math. & App., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 0557-0572, Nov. 2025.

Abstract

The study investigates the utilization of data mining techniques, especially the Apriori algorithm and K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) classification, in recommending appropriate learning methods based on student data. The purpose of this research is to analyze patterns and groupings in students’ behavior, preferences, and academic performance to support more informed and personalized educational strategies. The Apriori algorithm is used to identify frequent associations among learning related attributes, while KNN classification helps group students with similar learning characteristics. The analysis revealed that the digital learning method is the most preferred by students, with a percentage of 84.29%, followed by the traditional lecture method at 15.70%. These results reflect a notable trend toward technology-driven, flexible learning environments, although conventional approaches continue to hold relevance for a portion of learners. The research concludes that the integration of the Apriori algorithm and KNN clustering proves to be an effective analytical framework for facilitating adaptive learning. This approach allows educators and institutions to make data-driven decisions in tailoring instructional methods that align with the diverse needs and preferences of students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. S. B. W. Sukoco, Badri Munir, Akhmaloka, STRATEGI PENINGKATAN KUALITAS MENUJU PERGURUAN TINGGI BERKELAS DUNIA. 2023. [Online]. Available: http://dinkes.sulselprov.go.id/page/download
  2. J. M. Sihombing, S. Syahrial, and U. S. Manurung, “KESULITAN PESERTA DIDIK DALAM PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA MATERI PERKALIAN DAN PEMBAGIAN DI SEKOLAH DASAR,” J. Didakt. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1003–1016, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.26811/didaktika.v7i3.1177
  3. J. M. Adnan.K, Afandi F, “HUBUNGAN KEMAMPUAN LITERASI NUMERASI DENGAN HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS V SD GUGUS II,” pp. 423–430, 2021.
  4. M. Mariamah, S. Suciyati, and H. Hendrawan, “KEMAMPUAN NUMERASI SISWA SEKOLAH DASAR DITINJAU DARI JENIS KELAMIN,” Tunas : J. Penelit. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 17–19, Dec. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.fkip.unmul.ac.id/index.php/tunas/article/view/818
  5. U. Umar and A. Widodo, “ANALISIS FAKTOR PENYEBAB RENDAHNYA KEMAMPUAN AKADEMIK SISWA SEKOLAH DASAR DI DAERAH PINGGIRAN,” J. Educ. FKIP UNMA, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 458–465, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v8i2.2131
  6. F. T. P. Pangesti, “MENUMBUHKEMBANGKAN LITERASI NUMERASI PADA PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DENGAN SOAL HOTS,” Indones. Digit. J. Math. Educ., vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 566–575, 2018, [Online]. Available: http://idealmathedu.p4tkmatematika.org
  7. H. Nurhayati and N. W., Langlang Handayani, “JURNAL BASICEDU. JURNAL BASICEDU,” J. Basicedu, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 3(2), 524–532, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://journal.uii.ac.id/ajie/article/view/971
  8. D. S. Damayanti and P. I. Perdana, “PENGEMBANGAN E-MODUL PEMBELAJARAN TEMATIK (EMOTIK) BERBASIS FLIPBOOK PADA TEMA 8 SUBTEMA 1 KELAS V DI SEKOLAH DASAR,” J. Basicedu, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 2886–2897, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v7i5.5932
  9. N. L. Azizah, V. Liansari, and A. I. Kusuma, “NUMERACY DEVELOPMENT TRAINING FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS AT SD MUHAMMADIYAH 2 WARU SIDOARJO,” Community Empower., vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 1033–1039, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.31603/ce.8781
  10. V. Liansari and N. L. Azizah, “THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE USE OF ACTIVE, INNOVATIVE, CREATIVE, AND FUN LEARNING TECHNIQUES AND ONLINE ENGLISH LEARNING BY MULTIDISCIPLINARY STUDENTS,” KnE Soc. Sci., vol. 2022, pp. 18–23, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i10.11205
  11. A. M. Zen, A. Muhith, and S. S. Wahono, “DIGITAL FLIPBOOK-BASED LEARNING MEDIA DESIGN IN INTEGRATED THEMATIC LEARNING ON THE THEME OF GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF LIVING THINGS IN CLASS III INCLUSIVE …,” Attadib J. …, vol. 8, no. 1, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://www.jurnalfai-uikabogor.org/index.php/attadib/article/view/2700%0Ahttps://www.jurnalfai-uikabogor.org/index.php/attadib/article/download/2700/939. doi: https://doi.org/10.32507/attadib.v8i1.2700
  12. S. Silfia, “PENGEMBANGAN MEDIA PEMBELAJARAN FLIPBOOK DIGITAL BERBASIS LITERASI SAINS UNTUK SISWA KELAS IV SEKOLAH DASAR,” no. July, pp. 1–23, 2020.
  13. R. Hanifan, T. D. Putra, and D. Hartanti, “IMPLEMENTASI ALGORITMA APRIORI UNTUK PENGELOMPOKKAN PRODUK TERBAIK PADA PANGKALAN SUDIAWATI,” Komputa : J. Ilm. Komput. dan Informatika, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 59–67, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.34010/komputa.v11i2.7363
  14. B. Hardiyanto and F. Rozi, “PREDIKSI PENJUALAN SEPATU MENGGUNAKAN METODE K-NEAREST NEIGHBOR,” JOEICT(Jurnal Educ. Inf. Commun. Technol., vol. 04, no. 02, pp. 13–18, 2020.
  15. M. H. Santoso, “APPLICATION OF ASSOCIATION RULE METHOD USING APRIORI ALGORITHM TO FIND SALES PATTERNS CASE STUDY OF INDOMARET TANJUNG ANOM,” Brill. Res. Artif. Intell., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 54–66, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.47709/brilliance.v1i2.1228
  16. A. N. Rahmi and Y. A. Mikola, “IMPLEMENTASI ALGORITMA APRIORI UNTUK MENENTUKAN POLA PEMBELIAN PADA CUSTOMER (STUDI KASUS : TOKO BAKOEL SEMBAKO),” Inf. Syst. J., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 14–19, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.amikom.ac.id/index.php/infos/article/view/561. doi: https://doi.org/10.24076/infosjournal.2021v4i1.561
  17. A. Sanjaya and T. Wahyana, “PENERAPAN METODE K-NEAREST NEIGHBOUR UNTUK SISTEM PREDIKSI KELULUSAN SISWA MTS NURUL MUSLIMIN BERBASIS WEBSITE,” J. Transform. Mandalika, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 31–47, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://www.ojs.cahayamandalika.com/index.php/jtm/article/view/866%0Ahttps://www.ojs.cahayamandalika.com/index.php/jtm/article/download/866/863
  18. Y. Adriyani and R. Aulia, “PREDIKSI KELOMPOK UKT MAHASISWA MENGGUNAKAN ALGORITMA K-NEAREST NEIGHBOR (THE PREDICTION UKT OF STUDENTS USING THE K-NEAREST NEIGHBOR ALGORITHM),” vol. 8, pp. 121–130, 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.30595/juita.v8i1.6267
  19. M. N. Maskuri, K. Sukerti, and R. M. H. Bhakti, “PENERAPAN ALGORITMA K-NEAREST NEIGHBOR ( KNN ) UNTUK MEMPREDIKSI PENYAKIT STROKE,” Jurnal Ilmiah Intech : Information Technology Journal of UMUS, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 130–140, Mei, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.46772/intech.v4i01.751
  20. N. M. Sabri and S. F. A. Hamrizan, “PREDICTION OF MUET RESULTS BASED ON K-NEAREST NEIGHBOUR ALGORITHM,” Ann. Emerg. Technol. Comput., vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 50–59, 2023 doi: https://doi.org/10.33166/AETiC.2023.05.005
  21. K. W. Mahardika, Y. A. Sari, and A. Arwan, “OPTIMASI K-NEAREST NEIGHBOUR MENGGUNAKAN PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION PADA SISTEM PAKAR UNTUK MONITORING PENGENDALIAN HAMA PADA TANAMAN JERUK,” Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 3333–3344, 2018.
  22. Y. Zheng, P. Chen, B. Chen, D. Wei, and M. Wang, “APPLICATION OF APRIORI IMPROVEMENT ALGORITHM IN ASTHMA CASE DATA MINING,” J. Healthc. Eng., vol. 2021, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9018408
  23. P. WiraBuana, S. Jannet D.R.M., and I. Ketut Gede Darma Putra, “COMBINATION OF K-NEAREST NEIGHBOR AND K-MEANS BASED ON TERM RE-WEIGHTING FOR CLASSIFY INDONESIAN NEWS,” Int. J. Comput. Appl., vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 37–42, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.5120/7817-1105
  24. A. R. Isnain, J. Supriyanto, and M. P. Kharisma, “IMPLEMENTATION OF K-NEAREST NEIGHBOR (K-NN) ALGORITHM FOR PUBLIC SENTIMENT ANALYSIS OF ONLINE LEARNING,” IJCCS (Indonesian J. Comput. Cybern. Syst., vol. 15, no. 2, p. 121, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.22146/ijccs.65176
  25. M. R. Zuhdi, H. Syihabuddin, A. Jauhar, A. Achmad, and R. Fernandes, “COMPARISON OF DBSCAN AND K-MEANS CLUSTER ANALYSIS WITH PATH- ANOVA IN CLUSTERING WASTE MANAGEMENT BEHAVIOUR PATTERNS PERBANDINGAN ANALISIS CLUSTER DBSCAN DAN K-MEANS DENGAN PATH-ANOVA DALAM PENGELOMPOKAN POLA PERILAKU PENGELOLAAN,” vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 105–112, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.52436/1.jutif.2025.6.1.4183
  26. R. Sakti and A. Daulay, “ANALISIS KRITIS DAN PENGEMBANGAN ALGORITMA K-NEAREST NEIGHBOR ( KNN ): SEBUAH TINJAUAN LITERATUR,” vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 131–141, 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.47709/jpsk.v4i02.5055
  27. Z. Efendy, “NORMALISASI DALAM DESAIN DATABASE,” J. CoreIT, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 34–43, 2018.
  28. Y. Miftahuddin, S. Umaroh, and F. R. Karim, “PERBANDINGAN METODE PERHITUNGAN JARAK EUCLIDEAN , HAVERSINE , ( STUDI KASUS : INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI NASIONAL BANDUNG ),” vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 69–77, 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.36787/jti.v14i2.270