AN EXPLAINABLE FUZZY CLUSTERING FRAMEWORK FOR MODELING LEARNING TRAJECTORIES IN OUTCOME-BASED EDUCATION
Abstract
Although various studies have applied clustering and categorization techniques in educational assessment, most rely on deterministic thresholds or heuristic-based partitions that fail to uncover latent conceptual structures. Existing fuzzy clustering applications in education also seldom incorporate rigorous validity-index-driven model selection or explainability-focused interpretation, leaving a gap in modeling the gradual and overlapping nature of learning progression. Outcome-Based Education (OBE) emphasizes measurable learning outcomes as the cornerstone of curriculum design and assessment. However, traditional methods for classifying student performance—typically based on fixed score thresholds—fail to reflect the inherent complexity of conceptual learning. This study proposes an Explainable Fuzzy Clustering Framework to model student learning trajectories in an OBE environment. Using final scores derived from multiple Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs), the Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) algorithm is applied to cluster students into conceptual performance levels with soft membership assignments. The optimal number of clusters is determined using the Tang–Sun–Sun (TSS) and Xie–Beni (XB) validity indices. The resulting fuzzy clusters are then compared with three conventional manual classification schemes—fixed thresholding, quantile partitioning, and mean–standard deviation banding—using cross-tabulation, heatmaps, and quantitative agreement metrics such as Adjusted Rand Index (ARI) and Normalized Mutual Information (NMI). Visualization techniques including stacked membership plots and cluster-size bar charts are employed to enhance interpretability. Results show that fuzzy clustering moderately aligns with manual schemes while revealing latent transitions and overlapping boundaries that rigid methods overlook. Quantitatively, the fuzzy clusters formed a natural distribution of 17.9% Low, 36.9% Moderate, and 45.2% High performers, with agreement scores of ARI = 0.405–0.462 and NMI = 0.550–0.629. These findings confirm the robustness and interpretability of the proposed model. The framework provides a principled, explainable, and adaptive approach to formative assessment, contributing to the advancement of interpretable learning analytics in higher education.
Downloads
References
M. M. M. Syeed, A. S. M. Shihavuddin, M. F. Uddin, M. Hasan, and R. H. Khan, “OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION (OBE): DEFINING THE PROCESS AND PRACTICE FOR ENGINEERING EDUCATION,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 119170–119192, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3219477
R. Katawazai, “IMPLEMENTING OUTCOME-BASED EDUCATION AND STUDENT-CENTERED LEARNING IN AFGHAN PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES: THE CURRENT PRACTICES AND CHALLENGES,” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 5, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07076
A. W. Clemmons, D. A. Donovan, E. J. Theobald, and A. J. Crowe, “USING THE INTENDED–ENACTED–EXPERIENCED CURRICULUM MODEL TO MAP THE VISION AND CHANGE CORE COMPETENCIES IN UNDERGRADUATE BIOLOGY PROGRAMS AND COURSES,” CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 21, no. 1, p. ar6, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-02-0054
Q. I. Ali, “TOWARDS MORE EFFECTIVE SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT IN OBE: A NEW FRAMEWORK INTEGRATING DIRECT MEASUREMENTS AND TECHNOLOGY,” Discover Education, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 107, 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00208-5
J. Cain, M. Medina, F. Romanelli, and A. Persky, “DEFICIENCIES OF TRADITIONAL GRADING SYSTEMS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE FUTURE,” Am J Pharm Educ, vol. 86, no. 7, p. 8850, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8850
Z. Li, Z. A. Pardos, and C. Ren, “ALIGNING OPEN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES TO NEW TAXONOMIES: HOW AI TECHNOLOGIES CAN HELP AND IN WHICH SCENARIOS,” Comput Educ, vol. 216, p. 105027, 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105027
Q. Zhang, S. Chen, and W. Liu, “BALANCED KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER IN MTTL-CLINICALBERT: A SYMMETRICAL MULTI-TASK LEARNING FRAMEWORK FOR CLINICAL TEXT CLASSIFICATION,” Symmetry (Basel), vol. 17, no. 6, p. 823, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17060823
D. C. Youvan, “THE FUZZY-HOTT CONSCIOUSNESS MODEL: A HYBRID FRAMEWORK FOR UNDERSTANDING AMBIGUITY AND STRUCTURE IN HUMAN THOUGHT,” 2024.
J. Stanja, W. Gritz, J. Krugel, A. Hoppe, and S. Dannemann, “FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT STRATEGIES FOR STUDENTS’ CONCEPTIONS—THE POTENTIAL OF LEARNING ANALYTICS,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 58–75, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13288
A. E. Ezugwu et al., “A COMPREHENSIVE SURVEY OF CLUSTERING ALGORITHMS: STATE-OF-THE-ART MACHINE LEARNING APPLICATIONS, TAXONOMY, CHALLENGES, AND FUTURE RESEARCH PROSPECTS,” Eng Appl Artif Intell, vol. 110, p. 104743, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.104743
S. E. Hashemi, F. Gholian-Jouybari, and M. Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, “A FUZZY C-MEANS ALGORITHM FOR OPTIMIZING DATA CLUSTERING,” Expert Syst Appl, vol. 227, p. 120377, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120377
E. Stamkou, D. Keltner, R. Corona, E. Aksoy, and A. S. Cowen, “EMOTIONAL PALETTE: A COMPUTATIONAL MAPPING OF AESTHETIC EXPERIENCES EVOKED BY VISUAL ART,” Sci Rep, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 19932, 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-69686-9
U. Ahmed et al., “SIGNATURE-BASED INTRUSION DETECTION USING MACHINE LEARNING AND DEEP LEARNING APPROACHES EMPOWERED WITH FUZZY CLUSTERING,” Sci Rep, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 1726, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-85866-7
A. Y. Lee and J. T. Hancock, “DEVELOPING DIGITAL RESILIENCE: AN EDUCATIONAL INTERVENTION IMPROVES ELEMENTARY STUDENTS’ RESPONSE TO DIGITAL CHALLENGES,” Computers and Education Open, vol. 5, p. 100144, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100144
X. Wang, Y. Chen, J. Jin, and B. Zhang, “FUZZY-CLUSTERING AND FUZZY NETWORK BASED INTERPRETABLE FUZZY MODEL FOR PREDICTION,” Sci Rep, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 16279, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20015-y
M. A. Uddin, Y. Yoon, M. H. Head, and Q. O. Abiona, “GROUPING FACTORS IN BRIDGE COMPONENT DETERIORATION: A DATA-DRIVEN COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS USING MULTIFACETED SIMILARITY MEASURES,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, vol. 30, no. 6, p. 4025031, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-7016
A. M. Ikotun, F. Habyarimana, and A. E. Ezugwu, “CLUSTER VALIDITY INDICES FOR AUTOMATIC CLUSTERING: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW,” Heliyon, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41953
S. Zhu, L. Xu, and E. D. Goodman, “HIERARCHICAL TOPOLOGY-BASED CLUSTER REPRESENTATION FOR SCALABLE EVOLUTIONARY MULTIOBJECTIVE CLUSTERING,” IEEE Trans Cybern, vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 9846–9860, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2021.3081988
F. Wang, S. Qing, C. Sa, Q. Lai, and A. Chang, “REMOTE SENSING EVALUATION OF TROPHIC STATUS IN THE DAIHAI LAKE BASED ON FUZZY CLASSIFICATION,” Water (Basel), vol. 16, no. 21, p. 3032, 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/w16213032
A. F. Mohamed Nafuri, N. S. Sani, N. F. A. Zainudin, A. H. A. Rahman, and M. Aliff, “CLUSTERING ANALYSIS FOR CLASSIFYING STUDENT ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION,” Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 19, p. 9467, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199467
Á. López-Oriona, J. A. Vilar, and P. D’Urso, “QUANTILE-BASED FUZZY CLUSTERING OF MULTIVARIATE TIME SERIES IN THE FREQUENCY DOMAIN,” Fuzzy Sets Syst, vol. 443, pp. 115–154, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2022.02.015
J. A. Supovitz, C. B. Ebby, and G. Collins, “PATHWAYS TO PERFORMANCE: THE EXPERIMENTAL IMPACTS OF LEARNING TRAJECTORY-ORIENTED FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT IN MATHEMATICS,” American Journal of Education, vol. 130, no. 4, pp. 621–651, 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/730994
C. Cammies, J. A. Cunningham, and R. K. Pike, “NOT ALL BLOOM AND GLOOM: ASSESSING CONSTRUCTIVE ALIGNMENT, HIGHER ORDER COGNITIVE SKILLS, AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON STUDENTS’ PERCEIVED LEARNING WITHIN THE PRACTICAL COMPONENTS OF AN UNDERGRADUATE BIOLOGY COURSE,” J Biol Educ, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 588–608, 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2022.2092191
B. Albreiki, T. Habuza, and N. Zaki, “FRAMEWORK FOR AUTOMATICALLY SUGGESTING REMEDIAL ACTIONS TO HELP STUDENTS AT RISK BASED ON EXPLAINABLE ML AND RULE-BASED MODELS,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 49, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00354-6
Rustam et al., “MODIFIED POSSIBILISTIC FUZZY C-MEANS ALGORITHM FOR CLUSTERING INCOMPLETE DATA SETS,” Acta Polytechnica, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 364–377, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.14311/AP.2021.61.0364
Rustam, A. Y. Gunawan, and M. T. A. P. Kresnowati, “DATA DIMENSIONALITY REDUCTION TECHNIQUE FOR CLUSTERING PROBLEM OF METABOLOMICS DATA,” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 6, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09715
Rustam and K. Usman, "A NOVEL FUZZY CLUSTERING FRAMEWORK WITH MANHATTAN DISTANCE AND WEIGHTED MEDIAN CENTROIDS FOR OUTLIER-RESILIENT DATA ANALYSIS," in IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 190964-190979, 2025, doi:: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3629679
Rustam, D. N. Anggraini, K. Usman, and L. Gaur, “A NOVEL FUZZY CLUSTERING APPROACH WITH TRANSITION MATRIX FOR EXPLAINABLE EVALUATION OF SOCIAL MEDIA-BASED DIGITAL LITERACY INTERVENTIONS,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 298, p. 129769, 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.129769.
Rustam, A. Y. Gunawan, and M. T. A. P. Kresnowati, “ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK APPROACH FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF CLOVE BUDS ORIGIN BASED ON METABOLITES COMPOSITION,” Acta Polytechnica, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 440–447, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.14311/AP.2020.60.0440.
Rustam, A. Y. Gunawan, and M. T. A. P. Kresnowati, “THE HARD C-MEANS ALGORITHM FOR CLUSTERING INDONESIAN PLANTATION COMMODITY BASED ON METABOLITES COMPOSITION,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1315, p. 012085, 2019, IOP Publishing, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012085.
G. A. Salsabila, S. Sa'idah, and R. Rustam, “ANEMIA DETECTION THROUGH CONJUNCTIVA ON EYES USING HISTOGRAM OF ORIENTED GRADIENTS AND DECISION TREE CLASSIFICATION,” in Proc. 2022 8th Int. Conf. on Science and Technology (ICST), Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 2022, pp. 1–6, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICST56971.2022.10136290.
Rustam, “PRETREATMENT METHODS FOR ENHANCING MACHINE LEARNING PERFORMANCE ON METABOLOMICS DATA,” IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 80133–80148, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3567153
Copyright (c) 2026 Rustam Rustam, Koredianto Usman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this Journal agree to the following terms:
- Author retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a creative commons attribution license that allow others to share the work within an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication of this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangement for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g. acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal).
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their websites) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published works.
1.gif)
