QUANTILE BASED PLS-SEM WITH WILD BOOTSTRAP

  • Abdul Malik Balami Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science and Data Analytics, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9505-2265
  • Bambang Widjanarko Otok Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science and Data Analytics, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Indonesia
  • Santi Wulan Purnami Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science and Data Analytics, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0427-5445
Keywords: PLS-SEM, Quantile Regression, Structural Equation Modeling, Wild Bootstrap

Abstract

Partial Least Squares SEM (PLS-SEM) is the recommended technique for structural equation modeling (SEM), which assesses correlations between latent components concurrently, particularly for small samples and non-normal data. But because traditional PLS-SEM only calculates average correlations between constructs, it runs the risk of overlooking variances in the quantile distribution. Consequently, the creation of the Quantile PLS-SEM approach, which incorporates quantile regression, provides a means to examine correlations across the entire data distribution. To improve estimation, wild bootstrap is used to address heteroscedasticity issues and produce more reliable inferences. The purpose of this study is to develop and apply Quantile based PLS-SEM with Wild Bootstrap to analyze the gizi data status of the Indonesian population based on the Survey Status Gizi Indonesia 2024. The analysis's findings indicate that specific and sensitive interventions have a significant impact on the gizi status of different quantities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

G. Dash and J. Paul, “CB-SEM VS PLS-SEM METHODS FOR RESEARCH IN SOCIAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY FORECASTING,” Technol Forecast Soc Change, vol. 173, Dec. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121092.

M. Sarstedt, J. F. Hair, C. M. Ringle, K. O. Thiele, and S. P. Gudergan, “ESTIMATION ISSUES WITH PLS AND CBSEM: WHERE THE BIAS LIES!,” J Bus Res, vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 3998–4010, Oct. 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.06.007.

C. Davino and V. E. Vinzi, “QUANTILE COMPOSITE-BASED PATH MODELING,” Adv Data Anal Classif, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 491–520, Dec. 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11634-015-0231-9.

P. Dolce, C. Davino, and D. Vistocco, “QUANTILE COMPOSITE-BASED PATH MODELING: ALGORITHMS, PROPERTIES AND APPLICATIONS,” Adv Data Anal Classif, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 909–949, Dec. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11634-021-00469-0.

D. J. Lee, “BOOTSTRAP TESTS FOR STRUCTURAL BREAKS WHEN THE REGRESSORS AND THE SERIALLY CORRELATED ERROR TERM ARE UNSTABLE,” Bull Econ Res, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 212–229, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/boer.12243.

T. Bluhmki et al., “A WILD BOOTSTRAP APPROACH FOR THE AALEN–JOHANSEN ESTIMATOR,” Biometrics, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 977–985, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12861.

M. A. Martin, “WILD BOOTSTRAP,” Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online, vol. 2, pp. 1–6, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445112.stat08015.

C. Davino, P. Dolce, S. Taralli, and D. Vistocco, “COMPOSITE-BASED PATH MODELING FOR CONDITIONAL QUANTILES PREDICTION. AN APPLICATION TO ASSESS HEALTH DIFFERENCES AT LOCAL LEVEL IN A WELL-BEING PERSPECTIVE,” Soc Indic Res, vol. 161, no. 2–3, pp. 907–936, Jun. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02425-5.

H. Cheng, “QUANTILE-BASED PLS-SEM WITH BAG OF LITTLE BOOTSTRAPS,” Commun Stat Theory Methods, vol. 53, no. 18, pp. 6561–6579, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2023.2248324.

J. F. Hair, J. J. Risher, M. Sarstedt, and C. M. Ringle, “WHEN TO USE AND HOW TO REPORT THE RESULTS OF PLS-SEM,” Jan. 14, 2019, Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.

H. Latan and R. Noonan, PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES PATH MODELING: BASIC CONCEPTS, METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES AND APPLICATIONS. Springer International Publishing, 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3.

P. Tarka, “AN OVERVIEW OF STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING: ITS BEGINNINGS, HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT, USEFULNESS AND CONTROVERSIES IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES,” Qual Quant, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 313–354, Jan. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0469-8.

M. A. Ashraf and H. Ahmed, “APPROACHES TO QUALITY EDUCATION IN TERTIARY SECTOR: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY USING PLS-SEM,” Educ Res Int, vol. 2022, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5491496.

W. Zhang, B. Wang, and L. Zhou, “EVALUATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF ENGLISH-SPEAKING INSTRUCTION BASED ON PLS-SEM AND INTELLIGENT SPEECH SYSTEM,” Mobile Information Systems, vol. 2022, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1081327.

J. Llorens-Terrazas, “AN ORACLE INEQUALITY FOR MULTIVARIATE DYNAMIC QUANTILE FORECASTING,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 603–614, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2024.2415107.

T. Yoshida, “QUANTILE FUNCTION REGRESSION AND VARIABLE SELECTION FOR SPARSE MODELS,” Canadian Journal of Statistics, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1196–1221, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/cjs.11616.

G. Ciuperca, “ADAPTIVE LASSO MODEL SELECTION IN A MULTIPHASE QUANTILE REGRESSION,” Statistics (Ber), vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1100–1131, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02331888.2016.1151427.

S. P. Kumah and J. O. Mensah, “ARE CRYPTOCURRENCIES CONNECTED TO GOLD? A WAVELET-BASED QUANTILE-IN-QUANTILE APPROACH,” International Journal of Finance and Economics, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 3640–3659, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2342

J. Chen and Y. Liu, “Small Area Quantile Estimation,” International Statistical Review, vol. 87, no. S1, pp. S219–S238, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/insr.12293.

A. S. Blum and J. Salomon, “NOTHING COMES FROM NOTHING BUT THE RHO MESON: THE ORIGIN OF THE BOOTSTRAP CONCEPT IN PARTICLE PHYSICS,” Stud Hist Philos Sci, vol. 114, p. 102082, Dec. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.102082.

C. Lamarche and T. Parker, “WILD BOOTSTRAP INFERENCE FOR PENALIZED QUANTILE REGRESSION FOR LONGITUDINAL DATA,” J Econom, vol. 235, no. 2, pp. 1799–1826, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2022.11.011.

L. Amro, F. Konietschke, and M. Pauly, “INCOMPLETELY OBSERVED NONPARAMETRIC FACTORIAL DESIGNS WITH REPEATED MEASUREMENTS: A WILD BOOTSTRAP APPROACH,” Biometrical Journal, vol. 66, no. 8, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.70008.

L. Merlo, L. Petrella, N. Salvati, and N. Tzavidis, “UNIFIED UNCONDITIONAL REGRESSION FOR MULTIVARIATE QUANTILES, M-QUANTILES, AND EXPECTILES,” J Am Stat Assoc, vol. 119, no. 547, pp. 2154–2165, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2023.2250512.

Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia, SURVEI STATUS GIZI INDONESIA: SSGI 2024 DALAM ANGKA. Jakarta, 2024

Published
2026-01-26
How to Cite
[1]
A. M. Balami, B. W. Otok, and S. W. Purnami, “QUANTILE BASED PLS-SEM WITH WILD BOOTSTRAP”, BAREKENG: J. Math. & App., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1775–1790, Jan. 2026.

Most read articles by the same author(s)