BETA REGRESSION MODELING ON POVERTY DATA IN INDONESIA 2019 - 2022

  • Muhammad Arib Alwansyah Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1548-778X
  • Sigit Nugroho Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Bengkulu, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4535-2045
  • Ramya Rachmawati Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Bengkulu, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6094-9620
Keywords: Beta Regression Model, Newton-Raphson Method, Percentage of poor population

Abstract

The Central Statistics Agency (BPS) reported that the percentage of poor people in Indonesia increased from 2019 to 2021, reaching 10.14 percent. This condition highlights the need for an analytical approach capable of accurately modeling percentage data that are naturally bounded between 0 and 1. This study introduces a new approach by applying the Beta regression model to analyze the factors influencing poverty levels across Indonesian provinces. The novelty of this research lies in the application of the Beta regression model to panel data on poverty, which remains rarely explored in empirical studies on Indonesia’s socio-economic indicators. The model was chosen because it provides more efficient and unbiased parameter estimates than the ordinary least squares (OLS) method, especially when the dependent variable exhibits asymmetry and heteroskedasticity. Parameter estimation was conducted using the Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) method with the Newton–Raphson iterative algorithm to ensure convergence and estimation efficiency. The data used in this study are provincial-level poverty data sourced from official publications by the BPS. The analysis results indicate that the model meets the model suitability criteria for 2019 and 2020. Factors that significantly influenced the percentage of poor people in both years included the percentage of the population with health insurance and the literacy rate. Meanwhile, in 2021 and 2022, factors that significantly influenced the percentage of the poor population included the average years of schooling, the percentage of the population with health insurance, and the literacy rate. This study contributes to the field of applied statistics by demonstrating that the Beta regression model offers a novel and robust alternative for analyzing bounded and asymmetric socio-economic data. Furthermore, it provides new empirical insights into the statistical modeling of poverty in Indonesia, offering a methodological advancement over traditional regression approaches.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

W. Sari et al., “KEBIJAKAN ANTI KEMISKINAN PROGRAM PEMERINTAH DALAM PENANGGULANGAN KEMISKINAN DI INDONESIA,” J. Inov. Penelit., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2022.

Imam Machdi, STATISTIK INDONESIA STATISTICAL YEARBOOK OF INDONESIA 2023, 1st ed., vol. 1101001. Jakarta: Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik, 2023.

S. Martha, Y. Yundari, S. W. Rizki, and R. Tamtama, “PENERAPAN METODE GEOGRAPHICALLY WEIGHTED PANEL REGRESSION (GWPR) PADA KASUS KEMISKINAN DI INDONESIA,” BAREKENG: J. Ilmu Mat. dan Terap., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 241–248, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.30598/barekengvol15iss2pp241-248

J. Haughton and S. R. Khandker, HANDBOOK ON POVERTY AND INEQUALITY, First edit., no. January 2009. Washington DC: The World Bank, 2009.

W. Chetrin, “PEMODELAN PERSENTASE KEMISKINAN DI JAWA TIMUR DENGAN PENDEKATAN REGRESI NONPARAMETRIKA ADITIF BERDASARKAN ESTIMATOR PENALIZED SPLINE,” Departemen Matematika Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi, Universitas Airlangga, 2016.

N. Zuhdiyaty and D. Kaluge, “ANALISIS FAKTOR - FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI KEMISKINAN DI INDONESIA SELAMA LIMA TAHUN TERAKHIR,” J. Ilm. Bisnis dan Ekon. Asia, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 27–31, 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.32812/jibeka.v11i2.42

D. Kusumaningrum, A. S. E. Hidayat, K. A. Notodiputro, A. Kurnia, B. Sartono, and I. M. Sumertajaya, “FACTORS AFFECTING INDONESIAN PADDY HARVEST FAILURE: A COMPARISON OF BETA REGRESSION, QUASI-BINOMIAL REGRESSION, AND BETA MIXED MODELS,” Barekeng, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 2611–2622, 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.30598/barekengvol18iss4pp2611-2622

M. Al Faruq, A. S. Almaida, K. Fajri, and A. N. N. F. Tyaga, “MODEL INDEKS KEKUATAN NEGARA DENGAN REGRESI BETA: ANALISIS PENGARUH STABILITAS EKONOMI, DEMOGRAFI, DAN INFRASTRUKTUR TEKNOLOGI TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN PERTAHANAN DAN KEAMANAN,” Pop. J. Penelit. Mhs., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 247–259, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.58192/populer.v4i1.3005

B. N. Khairunnisa and N. Hajarisman, “PENERAPAN MODEL REGRESI BETA PADA PROPORSI ANGKA KEMATIAN NEONTAL TINGKAT KABUPATEN/KOTA DI PROVINSI JAWA BARAT TAHUN 2020,” Bandung Conf. Ser. Stat., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 236–245, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.29313/bcss.v3i2.7893

U. Panitanarak et al., “A NEW BETA DISTRIBUTION WITH INTERDISCIPLINARY DATA ANALYSIS,” AIMS Math., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 8495–8527, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2025391

A. B. Simas, W. Barreto-Souza, and A. V. Rocha, “IMPROVED ESTIMATORS FOR A GENERAL CLASS OF BETA REGRESSION MODELS,” Comput. Stat. Data Anal., vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 348–366, 2010. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2009.08.017

C. C. Lee, T. Roback, and H. S. Lim, “FACTORS IMPACTING WORK ENGAGEMENT OF GEN Z EMPLOYEES: A REGRESSION ANALYSIS,” J. Leadership, Account. Ethics, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 147–159, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2009.08.017

J. Fox, APPLIED REGRESSION ANALYSIS AND GENERALIZED LINEAR MODELS, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications, 2021.

A. S. Hamad, M. Mahmood, and F. Hussein, “COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF BETA REGRESSION MODELS ( BRM ) WITH DIFFERENT LINK FUNCTION USING REAL AND SIMULATION DATA : IDENTIFYING THE OPTIMAL MODEL,” vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 394–404, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.32894/1913-015-002-028

G. K. Smyth, “ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY WILEY GENERALIZED LINEAR MODELS WITH VARYING DISPERSION,” vol. 51, no. 1, 1989. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1989.tb01747.x

P. R. Sihombing, K. A. Notodiputro, and A. Kurnia, “BIBLIOMETRIC MAPPING AND TREND ANALYSIS OF BETA REGRESSION MODELING : A DECADE OF,” J. dan Penelit. Tek. Inform., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1062–1072, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v9i3.14949

B. W. Yap and C. H. Sim, “COMPARISONS OF VARIOUS TYPES OF NORMALITY TESTS,” J. Stat. Comput. Simul., vol. 81, no. 12, pp. 2141–2155, 2011. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2010.520163

S. S. Shapiro and M. B. Wilk, “AN ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE TEST FOR NORMALITY (COMPLETE SAMPLES),” Biometrika, vol. 52, no. 3/4, p. 591, 1965. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2333709

T. P. Ryan, MODERN REGRESSION METHODS, 2nd ed., vol. 34, no. 11. John Wiley & Sons. New York., 1997.

R. Rachmawati, N. Afandi, and M. A. Alwansyah, “SURVIVAL ANALYSIS ON DATA OF STUDENTS NOT GRADUATING ON TIME USING WEIBULL REGRESSION, COX PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS REGRESSION, AND RANDOM SURVIVAL FOREST METHODS,” Barekeng: J. Math. & App., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 2111–2126, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.30598/barekengvol19iss3pp2111-2126

M. Ridwan and S. Sunendiari, “MENDETEKSI DAN MENGATASI MULTIKOLINIERITAS PADA DATA PENELITIAN DIABETES MELITUS WANITA SUKU INDIAN TAHUN 2018,” Pros. Stat., pp. 64–70, 2021.

J. Fox and G. Monette, “GENERALIZED COLLINEARITY DIAGNOSTICS,” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., vol. 87, no. 417, pp. 178–183, 1992. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1992.10475190

N. S. Rahayu, “GEOGRAPHICALLY WEIGHTED PANEL REGRESSION UNTUK PEMODELAN PERSENTASE PENDUDUK MISKIN DI PROVINSI JAWA TENGAH,” Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, 2017.

Parkit Handono, N. D. Santi, and M. Fitria, PENGHITUNGAN DAN ANALISIS KEMISKINAN MAKRO INDONESIA 2023, 1st ed., 2021. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik, 2023.

Luhgiatno et al., PENGANTAR EKONOMI PEMBANGUNAN, First Edit. Kabupaten Purbalingga: Eureka Media Aksara.

Published
2026-04-08
How to Cite
[1]
M. Arib Alwansyah, S. Nugroho, and R. Rachmawati, “BETA REGRESSION MODELING ON POVERTY DATA IN INDONESIA 2019 - 2022”, BAREKENG: J. Math. & App., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 2099-2116, Apr. 2026.