SMARTPHONE PURCHASING DECISION MAKING USING AN INTERVAL-VALUED INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY AHP APPROACH: A CASE STUDY IN MALANG CITY
Abstract
The advancement of communication technology, particularly in the smartphone industry, has significantly influenced consumer purchasing behavior. This study aims to analyze the priority criteria in smartphone purchasing decisions using the Interval-valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (IVIF-AHP) method. Data was collected through interviews with three experts in the smartphone industry in Malang City. The analysis results showed that camera quality had the highest weight of , followed by RAM/storage capacity with a weight of , and the multiple SIM feature with a weight of . Although battery life and pricewere also considered, they had lower weights of and , respectively. These findings indicate that consumers prioritize features and quality over price. The application of the IVIF-AHP method allows handling uncertainty and produces more realistic priority weights that can be directly applied in marketing decision-making. This study also provides strategic implications for smartphone manufacturers: focus on promoting camera features and device performance, and consider the multiple-SIM feature in specific markets. In the future, adding other criteria, such as brand or screen size, could provide more comprehensive insights into decision-making.
Downloads
References
R. Fernandes, G. L. Rio D’Souza, and A. P. Rodrigues, “A NEW FRAMEWORK TO LOCATE, CONNECT AND SHARE MOBILE WEB SERVICES THROUGH INTELLIGENCE TECHNIQUES,” Evol. Intell., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 433–444, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-019-00249-y.
R. L. Kumar, F. Khan, S. Kadry, and S. Rho, “A SURVEY ON BLOCKCHAIN FOR INDUSTRIAL INTERNET OF THINGS: BLOCKCHAIN FOR INTERNET OF THINGS,” Alexandria Eng. J., vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 6001–6022, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.11.023.
M. E. . Medalla et al., “RELATIONSHIP MAPPING OF CONSUMER BUYING BEHAVIOR ANTECEDENTS OF SECONDHAND CLOTHING WITH FUZZY DEMATEL,” J. Manag. Anal., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 530–586, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23270012.2020.1870878.
C. Jebarajakirthy and A. Shankar, “IMPACT OF ONLINE CONVENIENCE ON MOBILE BANKING ADOPTION INTENTION: A MODERATED MEDIATION APPROACH,” J. Retail. Consum. Serv., vol. 58, no. September 2020, p. 102323, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102323.
R. S. Chandel, S. Sharma, S. Kaur, S. Singh, and R. Kumar, “SMART WATCHES: A REVIEW OF EVOLUTION IN BIO-MEDICAL SECTOR,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 50, pp. 1053–1066, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.07.460.
I. T. M. dan E. UI, “PERKEMBANGAN 5G SAAT INI DI INDONESIA.” [Online]. Available: https://ime.eng.ui.ac.id/perkembangan-5g-saat-ini-di-indonesia/
Netralnews, “JARINGAN 5G INDONESIA BARU MENJANGKAU 9% PENDUDUK, INI ALASANNYA.” [Online]. Available: https://www.netralnews.com/2025-jaringan-5g-indonesia-baru-menjangkau-9-penduduk-ini-alasannya/
B. P. S. P. J. Timur, “PERSENTASE PENDUDUK UMUR 5 TAHUN KE ATAS YANG MENGGUNAKAN TELEPON SELULER MENURUT KABUPATEN/KOTA DI PROVINSI JAWA TIMUR 2023,” BPS Jawa Timur. [Online]. Available: https://jatim.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/1/MzEzNiMx/persentase-penduduk-berumur-5-tahun-keatas-di-jawa-timur-yang-menggunakan-telepon-seluler--hp--dalam-3-bulan-terakhir---dirinci-menurut-kabupaten-kota-dan-jenis-kelamin--2023.html
S. G. Parsons and K. T. Duffy-Deno, “ARE TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATORS CORRECT IN THEIR BELIEFS THAT NETWORK SIZE AFFECTS ORIGINATION/TERMINATION?,” Telecomm. Policy, vol. 45, no. 2, p. 102078, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.102078.
J. Zhao, F. Xue, S. Khan, and S. F. A. Khatib, “CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR ANALYSIS FOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT,” Aggress. Violent Behav., p. 611130, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2021.101591.
G. Appel, L. Grewal, R. Hadi, and A. T. Stephen, “THE FUTURE OF SOCIAL MEDIA IN MARKETING,” J. Acad. Mark. Sci., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 79–95, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00695-1.
Rajagopal, DEVELOPMENT OF CONSUMER BEHAVIOR. IN: TRANSGENERATIONAL MARKETING: EVOLUTION, EXPANSION, AND EXPERIENCE. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33926-5_6.
T. Chikweche, J. Lappeman, and P. Egan, “TARGETING THE FLOATING MIDDLE OF PYRAMID CONSUMERS IN AFRICA: REVISITING MARKETING MIX CONSIDERATIONS,” J. Int. Consum. Mark., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 517–536, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2021.2006105.
M. . Pour, M. Hosseinzadeh, and H. . Mahdiraji, “EXPLORING AND EVALUATING SUCCESS FACTORS OF SOCIAL MEDIA MARKETING STRATEGY: A MULTI-DIMENSIONAL-MULTI-CRITERIA FRAMEWORK,” Foresight, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 655–678, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-01-2021-0005.
M. Rybaczewska, L. Sparks, and Ł. Sułkowski, “CONSUMERS’ PURCHASE DECISIONS AND EMPLOYER IMAGE,” J. Retail. Consum. Serv., vol. 55, no. October 2019, pp. 0–7, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102123.
A. Stankevich, “EXPLAINING THE CONSUMER DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: CRITICAL LITERATURE REVIEW,” J. Int. Bus. Res. Mark., vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 7–14, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.18775/jibrm.1849-8558.2015.26.3001.
H. Singer, “ANALYSIS OF KEY ATTRIBUTES OF WOODEN TOYS VIA AN INTERVAL-VALUED SPHERICAL FUZZY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS,” Özşahin, Şükrü, pp. 167–182.
K. Gompf, M. Traverso, and J. Hetterich, “USING ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) TO INTRODUCE WEIGHTS TO SOCIAL LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF MOBILITY SERVICES,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1–10, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031258.
Y. J. Kim and J. Park, “A SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY FOR THE UZBEKISTAN TEXTILE INDUSTRY: THE RESULTS OF A SWOT-AHP ANALYSIS,” Sustain., vol. 11, no. 17, pp. 1–22, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174613.
E. Tumsekcali, E. Ayyildiz, and A. Taskin, “INTERVAL VALUED INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY AHP-WASPAS BASED PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SERVICE QUALITY EVALUATION BY A NEW EXTENSION OF SERVQUAL MODEL: P-SERVQUAL 4.0,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 186, no. August, p. 115757, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115757.
E. Ayyildiz, “INTERVAL VALUED INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS-BASED GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN RESILIENCE EVALUATION METHODOLOGY IN POST COVID-19 ERA,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 30, no. 15, pp. 42476–42494, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16972-y.
R. Verma and S. Chandra, “INTERVAL-VALUED INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS FOR EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF SECURITY ATTRIBUTES IN FOG BASED INTERNET OF THINGS PARADIGM,” Comput. Commun., vol. 175, no. March, pp. 35–46, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2021.04.019.
X. Chen, Y. Fang, J. Chai, and Z. Xu, “DOES INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS WORK BETTER THAN ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS?,” Int. J. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 24, pp. 909–924, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-021-01163-1.
H. Singer and Ş. Özşahin, “PRIORITIZATION OF FACTORS AFFECTING SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF WOOD AND WOOD-BASED MATERIALS IN CNC MACHINING: A FUZZY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS MODEL,” Wood Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 63–71, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17480272.2020.1778079.
S. Karagoz, M. Deveci, V. Simic, N. Aydin, and U. Bolukbas, “A NOVEL INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY MCDM-BASED CODAS APPROACH FOR LOCATING AN AUTHORIZED DISMANTLING CENTER: A CASE STUDY OF ISTANBUL,” Waste Manag. Res., vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 660–672, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X19899729.
D. Şengül, G. Çağıl, and Z. Ardalı, “FUZZY SWARA AND INTERVAL-VALUED INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS APPLICATION IN JOB EVALUATION PROCESS,” J. Manag. Econ., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 243–263, 2021.
L. . Zadeh, “FUZZY SETS,” Inf. Control, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338–353, 1965, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.
A. Sanayei, S. Farid Mousavi, and A. Yazdankhah, “GROUP DECISION MAKING PROCESS FOR SUPPLIER SELECTION WITH VIKOR UNDER FUZZY ENVIRONMENT,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 24–30, 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.04.063.
K. T. Atanassov, “INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SETS, FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS,” vol. 20, no. 1, 1986, pp. 87–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3.
E. Ayyildiz and A. Taskin Gumus, “INTERVAL-VALUED PYTHAGOREAN FUZZY AHP METHOD-BASED SUPPLY CHAIN PERFORMANCE EVALUATION BY A NEW EXTENSION OF SCOR MODEL: SCOR 4.0,” Complex Intell. Syst., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 559–576, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-020-00221-9.
C. Kahraman, B. Öztayşi, and S. Çevik Onar, “AN INTEGRATED INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY AHP AND TOPSIS APPROACH TO EVALUATION OF OUTSOURCE MANUFACTURERS,” J. Intell. Syst., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 283–297, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/jisys-2017-0363.
O. Dogan, M. Deveci, F. Canıtez, and C. Kahraman, “A CORRIDOR SELECTION FOR LOCATING AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES USING AN INTERVAL-VALUED INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY AHP AND TOPSIS METHOD,” Soft Comput., vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 8937–8953, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04421-5.
K. T. Atanassov, “OPERATORS OVER INTERVAL VALUED INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SETS, FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS,” vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 159–174, 1994, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(94)90331-X.
S. Mandal, K. H. Gazi, S. Salahshour, S. P. Mondal, P. Bhattacharya, and A. K. Saha, “APPLICATION OF INTERVAL VALUED INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY UNCERTAIN MCDM METHODOLOGY FOR PH.D SUPERVISOR SELECTION PROBLEM,” Results Control Optim., vol. 15, p. 100411, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rico.2024.100411.
H. Singer and Ş. Özşahin, “AN INTERVAL-VALUED INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS MODEL FOR UNDERSTANDING CONSUMER DECISION-MAKING IN NON-WOOD FOREST PRODUCT PURCHASES,” J. Retail. Consum. Serv., vol. 78, no. January, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103734.
T. L. Saaty, “HOW TO MAKE A DECISION: THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 9–26, 1990, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I.
S. Alsmadi, K. Qassem Hailat, S. Bazi, and H. B. al-Haddad, “THE INFLUENCE OF CONSUMER AWARENESS IN THE DIGITAL ERA ON THE SELECTION OF SMARTPHONES: A STUDY AMONG JORDANIAN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 4, p. e25635, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25635.
S. S. Goswami and D. K. Behera, “EVALUATION OF THE BEST SMARTPHONE MODEL IN THE MARKET BY INTEGRATING FUZZY-AHP AND PROMETHEE DECISION-MAKING APPROACH,” Decision, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 71–96, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-020-00260-8.
J. Sujata, J. Yatin, C. Abhijit, S. Noopur, and D. Ruchi, “FACTORS AFFECTING SMARTPHONE PURCHASE AMONG INDIAN YOUTH: A DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS,” Indian J. Sci. Technol., vol. 9, no. 15, pp. 1–10, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i15/92117.
S. Bali et al., “A FRAMEWORK TO ASSESS THE SMARTPHONE BUYING BEHAVIOUR USING DEMATEL METHOD IN THE INDIAN CONTEXT,” Ain Shams Eng. J., no. xxxx, p. 102129, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2023.102129.
Copyright (c) 2026 Noor Hidayat, Vira Hari Krisnawati, Sobri Abusini, Desfi Rahmatul Khairi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this Journal agree to the following terms:
- Author retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a creative commons attribution license that allow others to share the work within an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication of this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangement for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g. acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal).
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their websites) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published works.




1.gif)


