SMARTPHONE PURCHASING DECISION MAKING USING AN INTERVAL-VALUED INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY AHP APPROACH: A CASE STUDY IN MALANG CITY

  • Noor Hidayat Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1098-415X
  • Vira Hari Krisnawati Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2666-9231
  • Sobri Abusini Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7989-0063
  • Desfi Rahmatul Khairi Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2649-4849
Keywords: Analytic Hierarchy Process, Decision making, Fuzzy Set, Interval-Valued Intuitionistic, Smartphone

Abstract

The advancement of communication technology, particularly in the smartphone industry, has significantly influenced consumer purchasing behavior. This study aims to analyze the priority criteria in smartphone purchasing decisions using the Interval-valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (IVIF-AHP) method. Data was collected through interviews with three experts in the smartphone industry in Malang City. The analysis results showed that camera quality  had the highest weight of , followed by RAM/storage capacity  with a weight of , and the multiple SIM feature  with a weight of . Although battery life  and pricewere also considered, they had lower weights of  and , respectively. These findings indicate that consumers prioritize features and quality over price. The application of the IVIF-AHP method allows handling uncertainty and produces more realistic priority weights that can be directly applied in marketing decision-making. This study also provides strategic implications for smartphone manufacturers: focus on promoting camera features and device performance, and consider the multiple-SIM feature in specific markets. In the future, adding other criteria, such as brand or screen size, could provide more comprehensive insights into decision-making.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

R. Fernandes, G. L. Rio D’Souza, and A. P. Rodrigues, “A NEW FRAMEWORK TO LOCATE, CONNECT AND SHARE MOBILE WEB SERVICES THROUGH INTELLIGENCE TECHNIQUES,” Evol. Intell., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 433–444, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-019-00249-y.

R. L. Kumar, F. Khan, S. Kadry, and S. Rho, “A SURVEY ON BLOCKCHAIN FOR INDUSTRIAL INTERNET OF THINGS: BLOCKCHAIN FOR INTERNET OF THINGS,” Alexandria Eng. J., vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 6001–6022, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.11.023.

M. E. . Medalla et al., “RELATIONSHIP MAPPING OF CONSUMER BUYING BEHAVIOR ANTECEDENTS OF SECONDHAND CLOTHING WITH FUZZY DEMATEL,” J. Manag. Anal., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 530–586, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23270012.2020.1870878.

C. Jebarajakirthy and A. Shankar, “IMPACT OF ONLINE CONVENIENCE ON MOBILE BANKING ADOPTION INTENTION: A MODERATED MEDIATION APPROACH,” J. Retail. Consum. Serv., vol. 58, no. September 2020, p. 102323, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102323.

R. S. Chandel, S. Sharma, S. Kaur, S. Singh, and R. Kumar, “SMART WATCHES: A REVIEW OF EVOLUTION IN BIO-MEDICAL SECTOR,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 50, pp. 1053–1066, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.07.460.

I. T. M. dan E. UI, “PERKEMBANGAN 5G SAAT INI DI INDONESIA.” [Online]. Available: https://ime.eng.ui.ac.id/perkembangan-5g-saat-ini-di-indonesia/

Netralnews, “JARINGAN 5G INDONESIA BARU MENJANGKAU 9% PENDUDUK, INI ALASANNYA.” [Online]. Available: https://www.netralnews.com/2025-jaringan-5g-indonesia-baru-menjangkau-9-penduduk-ini-alasannya/

B. P. S. P. J. Timur, “PERSENTASE PENDUDUK UMUR 5 TAHUN KE ATAS YANG MENGGUNAKAN TELEPON SELULER MENURUT KABUPATEN/KOTA DI PROVINSI JAWA TIMUR 2023,” BPS Jawa Timur. [Online]. Available: https://jatim.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/1/MzEzNiMx/persentase-penduduk-berumur-5-tahun-keatas-di-jawa-timur-yang-menggunakan-telepon-seluler--hp--dalam-3-bulan-terakhir---dirinci-menurut-kabupaten-kota-dan-jenis-kelamin--2023.html

S. G. Parsons and K. T. Duffy-Deno, “ARE TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATORS CORRECT IN THEIR BELIEFS THAT NETWORK SIZE AFFECTS ORIGINATION/TERMINATION?,” Telecomm. Policy, vol. 45, no. 2, p. 102078, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.102078.

J. Zhao, F. Xue, S. Khan, and S. F. A. Khatib, “CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR ANALYSIS FOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT,” Aggress. Violent Behav., p. 611130, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2021.101591.

G. Appel, L. Grewal, R. Hadi, and A. T. Stephen, “THE FUTURE OF SOCIAL MEDIA IN MARKETING,” J. Acad. Mark. Sci., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 79–95, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00695-1.

Rajagopal, DEVELOPMENT OF CONSUMER BEHAVIOR. IN: TRANSGENERATIONAL MARKETING: EVOLUTION, EXPANSION, AND EXPERIENCE. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33926-5_6.

T. Chikweche, J. Lappeman, and P. Egan, “TARGETING THE FLOATING MIDDLE OF PYRAMID CONSUMERS IN AFRICA: REVISITING MARKETING MIX CONSIDERATIONS,” J. Int. Consum. Mark., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 517–536, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2021.2006105.

M. . Pour, M. Hosseinzadeh, and H. . Mahdiraji, “EXPLORING AND EVALUATING SUCCESS FACTORS OF SOCIAL MEDIA MARKETING STRATEGY: A MULTI-DIMENSIONAL-MULTI-CRITERIA FRAMEWORK,” Foresight, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 655–678, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-01-2021-0005.

M. Rybaczewska, L. Sparks, and Ł. Sułkowski, “CONSUMERS’ PURCHASE DECISIONS AND EMPLOYER IMAGE,” J. Retail. Consum. Serv., vol. 55, no. October 2019, pp. 0–7, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102123.

A. Stankevich, “EXPLAINING THE CONSUMER DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: CRITICAL LITERATURE REVIEW,” J. Int. Bus. Res. Mark., vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 7–14, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.18775/jibrm.1849-8558.2015.26.3001.

H. Singer, “ANALYSIS OF KEY ATTRIBUTES OF WOODEN TOYS VIA AN INTERVAL-VALUED SPHERICAL FUZZY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS,” Özşahin, Şükrü, pp. 167–182.

K. Gompf, M. Traverso, and J. Hetterich, “USING ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) TO INTRODUCE WEIGHTS TO SOCIAL LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF MOBILITY SERVICES,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1–10, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031258.

Y. J. Kim and J. Park, “A SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY FOR THE UZBEKISTAN TEXTILE INDUSTRY: THE RESULTS OF A SWOT-AHP ANALYSIS,” Sustain., vol. 11, no. 17, pp. 1–22, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174613.

E. Tumsekcali, E. Ayyildiz, and A. Taskin, “INTERVAL VALUED INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY AHP-WASPAS BASED PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SERVICE QUALITY EVALUATION BY A NEW EXTENSION OF SERVQUAL MODEL: P-SERVQUAL 4.0,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 186, no. August, p. 115757, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115757.

E. Ayyildiz, “INTERVAL VALUED INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS-BASED GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN RESILIENCE EVALUATION METHODOLOGY IN POST COVID-19 ERA,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 30, no. 15, pp. 42476–42494, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16972-y.

R. Verma and S. Chandra, “INTERVAL-VALUED INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS FOR EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF SECURITY ATTRIBUTES IN FOG BASED INTERNET OF THINGS PARADIGM,” Comput. Commun., vol. 175, no. March, pp. 35–46, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2021.04.019.

X. Chen, Y. Fang, J. Chai, and Z. Xu, “DOES INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS WORK BETTER THAN ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS?,” Int. J. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 24, pp. 909–924, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-021-01163-1.

H. Singer and Ş. Özşahin, “PRIORITIZATION OF FACTORS AFFECTING SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF WOOD AND WOOD-BASED MATERIALS IN CNC MACHINING: A FUZZY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS MODEL,” Wood Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 63–71, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17480272.2020.1778079.

S. Karagoz, M. Deveci, V. Simic, N. Aydin, and U. Bolukbas, “A NOVEL INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY MCDM-BASED CODAS APPROACH FOR LOCATING AN AUTHORIZED DISMANTLING CENTER: A CASE STUDY OF ISTANBUL,” Waste Manag. Res., vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 660–672, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X19899729.

D. Şengül, G. Çağıl, and Z. Ardalı, “FUZZY SWARA AND INTERVAL-VALUED INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS APPLICATION IN JOB EVALUATION PROCESS,” J. Manag. Econ., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 243–263, 2021.

L. . Zadeh, “FUZZY SETS,” Inf. Control, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338–353, 1965, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.

A. Sanayei, S. Farid Mousavi, and A. Yazdankhah, “GROUP DECISION MAKING PROCESS FOR SUPPLIER SELECTION WITH VIKOR UNDER FUZZY ENVIRONMENT,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 24–30, 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.04.063.

K. T. Atanassov, “INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SETS, FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS,” vol. 20, no. 1, 1986, pp. 87–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3.

E. Ayyildiz and A. Taskin Gumus, “INTERVAL-VALUED PYTHAGOREAN FUZZY AHP METHOD-BASED SUPPLY CHAIN PERFORMANCE EVALUATION BY A NEW EXTENSION OF SCOR MODEL: SCOR 4.0,” Complex Intell. Syst., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 559–576, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-020-00221-9.

C. Kahraman, B. Öztayşi, and S. Çevik Onar, “AN INTEGRATED INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY AHP AND TOPSIS APPROACH TO EVALUATION OF OUTSOURCE MANUFACTURERS,” J. Intell. Syst., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 283–297, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/jisys-2017-0363.

O. Dogan, M. Deveci, F. Canıtez, and C. Kahraman, “A CORRIDOR SELECTION FOR LOCATING AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES USING AN INTERVAL-VALUED INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY AHP AND TOPSIS METHOD,” Soft Comput., vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 8937–8953, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04421-5.

K. T. Atanassov, “OPERATORS OVER INTERVAL VALUED INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SETS, FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS,” vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 159–174, 1994, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(94)90331-X.

S. Mandal, K. H. Gazi, S. Salahshour, S. P. Mondal, P. Bhattacharya, and A. K. Saha, “APPLICATION OF INTERVAL VALUED INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY UNCERTAIN MCDM METHODOLOGY FOR PH.D SUPERVISOR SELECTION PROBLEM,” Results Control Optim., vol. 15, p. 100411, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rico.2024.100411.

H. Singer and Ş. Özşahin, “AN INTERVAL-VALUED INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS MODEL FOR UNDERSTANDING CONSUMER DECISION-MAKING IN NON-WOOD FOREST PRODUCT PURCHASES,” J. Retail. Consum. Serv., vol. 78, no. January, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103734.

T. L. Saaty, “HOW TO MAKE A DECISION: THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 9–26, 1990, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I.

S. Alsmadi, K. Qassem Hailat, S. Bazi, and H. B. al-Haddad, “THE INFLUENCE OF CONSUMER AWARENESS IN THE DIGITAL ERA ON THE SELECTION OF SMARTPHONES: A STUDY AMONG JORDANIAN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 4, p. e25635, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25635.

S. S. Goswami and D. K. Behera, “EVALUATION OF THE BEST SMARTPHONE MODEL IN THE MARKET BY INTEGRATING FUZZY-AHP AND PROMETHEE DECISION-MAKING APPROACH,” Decision, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 71–96, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-020-00260-8.

J. Sujata, J. Yatin, C. Abhijit, S. Noopur, and D. Ruchi, “FACTORS AFFECTING SMARTPHONE PURCHASE AMONG INDIAN YOUTH: A DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS,” Indian J. Sci. Technol., vol. 9, no. 15, pp. 1–10, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i15/92117.

S. Bali et al., “A FRAMEWORK TO ASSESS THE SMARTPHONE BUYING BEHAVIOUR USING DEMATEL METHOD IN THE INDIAN CONTEXT,” Ain Shams Eng. J., no. xxxx, p. 102129, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2023.102129.

Published
2026-01-26
How to Cite
[1]
N. Hidayat, V. H. Krisnawati, S. Abusini, and D. R. Khairi, “SMARTPHONE PURCHASING DECISION MAKING USING AN INTERVAL-VALUED INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY AHP APPROACH: A CASE STUDY IN MALANG CITY”, BAREKENG: J. Math. & App., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1731–1742, Jan. 2026.