COMPARISON OF LINEAR REGRESSION AND ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK MODELS FOR PREDICTING FISH CATCH VOLUME IN URENG VILLAGE, CENTRAL MALUKU

  • Kasriana Kasriana Mathematics Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Universitas and Education, Universitas Darussalam Ambon, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3980-7088
  • Rasid Ode Mathematics Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Universitas and Education, Universitas Darussalam Ambon, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4042-1437
  • Eryka Lukman Aquatic Resource Management Study Program, Faculty of Fisheries, Universitas Darussalam Ambon, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2481-4636
  • Agung K. Henaulu Industrial Engineering Study Program, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Darussalam Ambon, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7904-3692
Keywords: Artificial Neural Network, Fish catch prediction, Linear Regression, Model comparison

Abstract

This study aims to develop a predictive model for fish catch volume in Ureng Village, Central Maluku, using a mathematical modeling approach based on artificial intelligence with the Scikit-Learn and TensorFlow libraries. The research dataset consists of 24 monthly data records collected from July 2024 to June 2025. The data were obtained through a combination of primary and secondary collection methods. Primary data were gathered through interviews, field observations, and fishermen’s catch records, while secondary data included oceanographic parameters such as sea surface temperature, weather conditions, and current velocity. Two main models were developed: a linear regression model using Scikit-Learn as the baseline and a neural network model using TensorFlow as the comparator, both trained and evaluated on the same dataset to ensure consistency. The testing results show that the linear regression model produced a Mean Squared Error (MSE) of 0.8821 and a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.682, while the neural network model achieved an MSE of 0.5423 and an R² of 0.815. These findings indicate that the neural network model is more capable of capturing nonlinear patterns among temperature, weather, and current variables, resulting in higher prediction accuracy than the linear model. Nevertheless, this study is limited by the relatively small sample size and the need for a more detailed description of the data period and measurement units to allow a more objective evaluation of the model’s performance. Overall, this AI-based approach has the potential to support more efficient, adaptive, and sustainable decision-making in fishery planning for coastal communities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

B. Kühn et al., “MACHINE LEARNING APPLICATIONS FOR FISHERIES—AT SCALES FROM GENOMICS TO ECOSYSTEMS,” 2025, Taylor and Francis Ltd. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2024.2423189.

J. T. Watson et al., “FISHERY CATCH RECORDS SUPPORT MACHINE LEARNING-BASED PREDICTION OF ILLEGAL FISHING OFF US WEST COAST,” PeerJ, vol. 11, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.16215.

M. Xie, B. Liu, and X. Chen, “DEEP LEARNING-BASED FISHING GROUND PREDICTION WITH MULTIPLE ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS,” Mar. Life Sci. Technol., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 736–749, Nov. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42995-024-00222-4.

H. Han et al., “A NEW MODELING STRATEGY FOR THE PREDICTIVE MODEL OF CHUB MACKEREL (SCOMBER JAPONICUS) CENTRAL FISHING GROUNDS IN THE NORTHWEST PACIFIC OCEAN BASED ON MACHINE LEARNING AND OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE LIGHT FISHING VESSELS,” Front. Mar. Sci., vol. 11, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2024.1451104.

Y. Shi et al., “REVEALING THE EFFECTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND SPATIO-TEMPORAL VARIABLES ON CHANGES IN JAPANESE SARDINE (SARDINOPS MELANOSTICTUS) HIGH ABUNDANCE FISHING GROUNDS BASED ON INTERPRETABLE MACHINE LEARNING APPROACH,” Front. Mar. Sci., vol. 11, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2024.1503292.

E. Gilman and M. Chaloupka, “EVIDENCE FROM INTERPRETABLE MACHINE LEARNING TO INFORM SPATIAL MANAGEMENT OF PALAU’S TUNA FISHERIES,” Ecosphere, vol. 15, no. 2, Feb. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4751.

I. Galparsoro et al., “PREDICTING IMPORTANT FISHING GROUNDS FOR THE SMALL-SCALE FISHERY, BASED ON AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM RECORDS, CATCHES, AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA,” ICES J. Mar. Sci., vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 453–469, Apr. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsae006.

B. N. Jensen, “OIL SPILL FORENSICS – IDENTIFICATION OF SOURCES OF OIL SPILLS BY COMBINING ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, MULTIVARIATE DATA ANALYSIS AND NEURAL NETWORKS,” no. May, 2025.

M. Xie, B. Liu, X. Chen, W. Yu, and J. Wang, “DEEP LEARNING-BASED FISHING GROUND PREDICTION USING ASYMMETRIC SPATIOTEMPORAL SCALES: A CASE STUDY OF OMMASTREPHES BARTRAMII,” Fishes, vol. 9, no. 2, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9020064.

F. Han, Y. Liu, H. Tian, J. Li, and Y. Tian, “A COMPREHENSIVE FRAMEWORK INCORPORATING DEEP LEARNING FOR ANALYZING FISHING VESSEL ACTIVITY USING AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM DATA,” ICES J. Mar. Sci., vol. 82, no. 2, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsae166.

D. Petza et al., “CONTRIBUTION OF AREA-BASED FISHERIES MANAGEMENT MEASURES TO FISHERIES SUSTAINABILITY AND MARINE CONSERVATION: A GLOBAL SCOPING REVIEW,” Rev. Fish Biol. Fish., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 1049–1073, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-023-09780-9.

I. J. Biosci and R. M. Dellosa, “A MACHINE LEARNING PREDICTION OF THE FISHERIES PRODUCTION IN THE PHILIPPINES USING WEKA,” Int. J. Biosci., vol. 6655, pp. 162–171, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.12692/ijb/23.1.162-171.

M. Munkholm and D. Version, “MONITORING USING IN-TRAWL CAMERAS AND AUTOMATIC IMAGE PROCESSING DEVELOPMENT OF DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS FOR COMMERCIAL FISHERIES AND FOR FISHERIES MONITORING USING IN-TRAWL CAMERAS AND AUTOMATIC IMAGE PROCESSING NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES,” 2024.

M. B. Saif and M. Khanam, “COMPARING ARIMA, NEURAL NETWORK AND HYBRID MODELS FOR FORECASTING FISH PRODUCTION IN BANGLADESH,” Dhaka Univ. J. Sci., vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 71–76, Mar. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3329/dujs.v72i1.71192.

A. Shamsuddin and N. Mohamed, “A COMPARISON OF PREDICTIVE MODELLING TECHNIQUES FOR REDUCING PRICE VOLATALITY IN THE MALAYSIA SECTOR,” J. Math. Sci. Informatics, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–9, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.46754/jmsi.2023.12.001.

S. K. Stephen, V. K. Yadav, and R. R. Kumar, “COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STATISTICAL AND MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES FOR FISH PRODUCTION FORECASTING IN ANDHRA PRADESH UNDER CLIMATE CHANGE SCENARIO,” Indian J. Geo-Marine Sci., vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 776–784, Sep. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.56042/ijms.v51i09.2337.

H. Yuan, Y. Gu, J. Wang, Y. Chen, and X. Chen, “STUDY ON THE MEDIUM AND LONG TERM OF FISHERY FORECASTING BASED ON NEURAL NETWORK,” Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics), vol. 7530 LNAI, pp. 626–633, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33478-8_77.

L. Alfaris et al., “PREDICTING OCEAN CURRENT TEMPERATURE OFF THE EAST COAST OF AMERICA WITH XGBOOST AND RANDOM FOREST ALGORITHMS USING RSTUDIO,” Ilmu Kelaut. Indones. J. Mar. Sci., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 273–284, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.14710/ik.ijms.29.2.273-284.

D. Arbahri, O. D. Nurhayati, and I. Mudita, “MACHINE LEARNING OCEANOGRAPHIC DATA FOR PREDICTION OF THE POTENTIAL OF MARINE RESOURCES,” J. Comput. Sci., vol. 20Arbahri, no. 2, pp. 129–139, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2024.129.139.

by M. Patrick Millan, “REGULARIZED REGRESSION METHODS AND NEURAL NETWORKS FOR MODELING FISH POPULATION HEALTH WITH WATER QUALITY VARIABLES IN THE ATHABASCA OIL SANDS REGION.”

P. B. Ngor et al., “PREDICTING FISH SPECIES RICHNESS AND ABUNDANCE IN THE LOWER MEKONG BASIN,” Front. Ecol. Evol., vol. 11, no. June, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2023.1131142.

Published
2026-01-26
How to Cite
[1]
K. Kasriana, R. Ode, E. Lukman, and A. Henaulu, “COMPARISON OF LINEAR REGRESSION AND ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK MODELS FOR PREDICTING FISH CATCH VOLUME IN URENG VILLAGE, CENTRAL MALUKU”, BAREKENG: J. Math. & App., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1743–1756, Jan. 2026.