GAME THEORY AND GENETIC ALGORITHM PERSPECTIVE FOR SOLVING MULTI-ECHELON INVENTORY MODELS

Keywords: Game Theory, Genetic Algorithm, Inventory, Nash Equilibrium, Pareto Optimal

Abstract

The inventory model provides a mathematical foundation for estimating total costs in managing product flow within a supply chain. As modern supply chains involve multiple decision makers with potentially conflicting objectives, multi-echelon inventory systems require both cost optimization and strategic coordination. Conventional optimization methods are often insufficient to capture these strategic interactions. To address this challenge, this study develops a hybrid model integrating game-theoretic analysis with a Genetic Algorithm (GA) to optimize decision-making in multi-echelon inventory systems. The main contribution of this study lies in integrating game-theoretic equilibrium concepts with a genetic algorithm framework to provide a unified analytical–computational approach for two-echelon inventory decision-making. Game theory represents the strategic behavior among supply chain actors through equilibrium concepts such as Nash and Stackelberg equilibria, while the GA efficiently explores high-dimensional decision spaces to obtain near-optimal solutions. The integration of game-theoretic equilibrium concepts with a genetic algorithm framework allows the resulting solutions to satisfy equilibrium conditions while remaining computationally tractable. This hybrid framework provides a more realistic representation of supply chain decision-making under competitive or cooperative settings. The results demonstrate that the proposed approach enhances the performance of classical game-theoretic inventory models, offering a robust tool for optimizing inventory strategies in complex supply chain environments. The results demonstrate improvements in total inventory cost and coordination efficiency across the vendor–buyer system under different equilibrium schemes. However, this study is limited to a two-echelon deterministic inventory structure with numerical illustrations

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

S. K. Goyal, “AN INTEGRATED INVENTORY MODEL FOR A SINGLE SUPPLIER-SINGLE CUSTOMER PROBLEM,” The International Journal of Production Research, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 107–111, 1977. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207547708943107.

M. Esmaeili, M.-B. Aryanezhad, and P. Zeephongsekul, “A GAME THEORY APPROACH IN SELLER–BUYER SUPPLY CHAIN,” European Journal of Operations Research, vol. 195, no. 2, pp. 442–448, 2009. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.02.026.

M. Elyasi, F. Khoshalhan, and M. Khanmirzaee, “MODIFIED ECONOMIC ORDER QUANTITY (EOQ) MODEL FOR ITEMS WITH IMPERFECT QUALITY: GAME-THEORETICAL APPROACHES,” International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 211, 2014. doi: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijiec.2014.1.003

R. Setiawan, “A GAME THEORY APPROACH IN VENDOR-BUYER PROBABILISTIC INVENTORY SYSTEM WITH IMPERFECT QUALITY, INSPECTION ERROR, MINIMUM SERVICE LEVEL CONSTRAINT AND PARTIAL BACKORDERING,” Far East Journal of Mathematical Sciences, vol. 100, no. 10, p. 1695, 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.17654/MS100101695.

R. Setiawan, “NON-COOPERATIVE INVENTORY GAMES FOR DEFECTIVE ITEMS AND QUANTITY DISCOUNTS USING STRATEGIC COMPLEMENTARITY,” Croatian Operational Research Review, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 53–64, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.17535/crorr.2025.0005.

R. Setiawan and I. Endrayanto, “ANALYSIS OF THE N-PERSON NONCOOPERATIVE SUPERMODULAR MULTIOBJECTIVE GAMES,” Operations Research Letters, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 278–284, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orl.2023.03.007.

R. Setiawan and I. Endrayanto, “ANALYSIS OF A SINGLE MANUFACTURER MULTI-RETAILER INVENTORY COMPETITION USING SUPERMODULAR MULTI-OBJECTIVE GAMES,” Mathematical Modelling of Engineering Problems, vol. 9, no. 3, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.18280/mmep.090301.

G. Rota-Graziosi, “THE SUPERMODULARITY OF THE TAX COMPETITION GAME,” J Math Econ, vol. 83, pp. 25–35, 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmateco.2019.04.003.

G. Koshevoy, T. Suzuki, and D. Talman, “SUPERMODULAR NTU-GAMES,” Operations Research Letters, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 446–450, 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orl.2016.04.007.

S. Yin, T. Nishi, and G. Zhang, “A GAME THEORETIC MODEL FOR COORDINATION OF SINGLE MANUFACTURER AND MULTIPLE SUPPLIERS WITH QUALITY VARIATIONS UNDER UNCERTAIN DEMANDS,” International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logistics, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 79–91, 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2015.1050079.

K. Halat and A. Hafezalkotob, “MODELING CARBON REGULATION POLICIES IN INVENTORY DECISIONS OF A MULTI-STAGE GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN: A GAME THEORY APPROACH,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 128, pp. 807–830, 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.01.009

P. Ghasemi, F. Goodarzian, J. Muñuzuri, and A. Abraham, “A COOPERATIVE GAME THEORY APPROACH FOR LOCATION-ROUTING-INVENTORY DECISIONS IN HUMANITARIAN RELIEF CHAIN INCORPORATING STOCHASTIC PLANNING,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 104, pp. 750–781, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2021.12.023

X. Xu, R. Yue, B. Yang, and Z. Li, “INTEGRATING GAME THEORY AND DATA-DRIVEN OPTIMIZATION MODELS FOR ONLINE RETAILERS WITH REUSABLE PACKAGING ADOPTION,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, vol. 84, p. 104222, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104222

Z. Wei, “CONSTRUCTION OF SUPPLY CHAIN FINANCE GAME MODEL BASED ON BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY AND NASH EQUILIBRIUM ANALYSIS,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 262, pp. 901–908, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.05.124

S. Ren, C. Liang, Y. Liu, J. Wang, and C. Wang, “EVOLUTIONARY GAME-BASED WAREHOUSING RESOURCES SHARING STRATEGY FOR LOGISTICS INDUSTRY UNDER PRODUCT-SERVICE SYSTEM PARADIGM,” Advanced Engineering Informatics, vol. 67, p. 103560, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2025.103560

J. Yang and S. T. Ng, “PROSPECTS FOR DIGITAL TWIN TECHNOLOGY IN THE BUILDING MODULAR CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION PHASES: A GAME THEORY-BASED ANALYSIS,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 470, p. 143344, 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143344

S. Mahato, F. Mahato, and G. C. Mahata, “GAME THEORETICAL ANALYSIS IN SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAIN FOR PERISHABLE PRODUCTS INCORPORATING TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIES AND PARTIAL BACKLOGGING UNDER CARBON EMISSIONS,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 519, p. 145890, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145890.

L. Silbermayr, “A REVIEW OF NON-COOPERATIVE NEWSVENDOR GAMES WITH HORIZONTAL INVENTORY INTERACTIONS,” Omega, vol. 92, p. 102148, 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.102148

R. Setiawan, “A PROBABILISTIC INVENTORY PROBLEM FOR IMPERFECT QUALITY WITH PARTIAL SHORTAGE BACKORDERING, CARBON EMISSION, AND ITS COMPUTATION USING GENETIC ALGORITHM IN PYTHON.,” Mathematical Modelling of Engineering Problems, vol. 11, no. 7, 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.18280/mmep.110708

R. Setiawan, “GREEN PROBABILISTIC INVENTORY MODEL WITH SHORTAGE BACKORDERING, CARBON EMISSION COST, AND IMPERFECT QUALITY ITEMS: A NEWTON-RAPHSON METHOD APPROACH USING PYTHON,” Journal of the Indonesian Mathematical Society, pp. 77–88, 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.22342/jims.30.1.1677.77-88

J. Blank and K. Deb, “PYMOO: MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION IN PYTHON,” IEEE access, vol. 8, pp. 89497–89509, 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2990567

Published
2026-08-24
How to Cite
[1]
R. Setiawan and M. A. T. Ariyanto, “GAME THEORY AND GENETIC ALGORITHM PERSPECTIVE FOR SOLVING MULTI-ECHELON INVENTORY MODELS”, BAREKENG: J. Math. & App., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 3137-3150, Aug. 2026.