MODELING AND ESTIMATING DYNAMIC CONTRACEPTIVE BEHAVIOR USING SPATIO-TEMPORAL PHYSICS-INFORMED NEURAL NETWORKS

Keywords: Contraceptive Use, Dynamic Parameter Estimation, ST-PINN, SCNP Model

Abstract

This study develops a Spatio-Temporal Physics-Informed Neural Network (ST-PINN) framework to model contraceptive use dynamics in West Sumatra, Indonesia. Existing models often assume spatial homogeneity and time-invariant parameters, which limit their ability to reflect real-world regional disparities and temporal changes in contraceptive behavior. To address this limitation, this study proposes a hybrid modeling approach that integrates differential equation-based modeling with data-driven learning in a spatio-temporal framework. The proposed model estimates contraceptive adoption, success, and failure rates across 19 districts and cities from 2012 to 2024. This study contributes by (1) developing a spatio-temporal PINN framework for dynamic parameter estimation, (2) integrating spatial and temporal data into a mechanistic model, and (3) providing region-specific insights into contraceptive dynamics. The PINN model achieves high predictive accuracy, with RMSE values ranging from 0.04678 to 0.16132 and R² values exceeding 0.85 in several regions with stable data patterns. In contrast, the ST-PINN framework provides enhanced capability in capturing spatial heterogeneity and reveals distinct regional patterns, including consistently high adoption rates in the Mentawai Islands and notable post-2018 changes across multiple regions. However, performance variability across regions indicates the presence of unobserved local factors. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating spatial and temporal heterogeneity in demographic modeling and demonstrate the significance of the ST-PINN framework as a flexible and effective tool for capturing complex regional dynamics and supporting policy-relevant decision-making in reproductive health. Nevertheless, the absence of socio-economic and behavioral variables remains a limitation. Future research should integrate additional data sources to improve model robustness and interpretability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

J. Bongaarts, J. C. Cleland, J. Townsend, J. T. Bertrand, and M. Das Gupta, FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMS FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY FAM: RATIONAL AND DESIGN. 2012. [Online]. doi: https://doi.org/10.31899/rh11.1017

WHO, “FAMILY PLANNING/CONTRACEPTION,” World Health Organization.

B. Utomo, P. K. Sucahya, N. A. Romadlona, A. S. Robertson, R. I. Aryanty, and R. J. Magnani, “THE IMPACT OF FAMILY PLANNING ON MATERNAL MORTALITY IN INDONESIA : WHAT FUTURE CONTRIBUTION CAN BE EXPECTED ?,” pp. 1–13, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-020-00245-w

BKKBN, “LAPORAN KINERJA PROGRAM KEPENDUDUKAN DAN KB NASIONAL,” 2022.

G. Sedgh, L. S. Ashford, and R. Hussain, “UNMET NEED FOR CONTRACEPTION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: EXAMINING WOMEN’S REASONS FOR NOT USING A METHOD,” Guttmacher Inst., no. June, pp. 1–93, 2016.

L. Kurnia and N. A. Samat, “GEOGRAPHIC WEIGHTED REGRESSION MODELS FOR CONTRACEPTIVE USE IN WEST SUMATERA,” J. Sci. Math. Technol., vol. 12, pp. 53–63, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.37134/ejsmt.vol12.sp.6.2025

B. A. Ejigu et al., “SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF MODERN CONTRACEPTIVE USE AMONG WOMEN WHO NEED IT IN ETHIOPIA: USING GEO-REFERENCED DATA FROM PERFORMANCE MONITORING FOR ACTION,” PLoS One, vol. 19, no. 4, April, 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297818.

M. N. Khan and M. L. Harris, “SPATIAL VARIATION IN THE NON-USE OF MODERN CONTRACEPTION AND ITS PREDICTORS IN BANGLADESH,” Sci. Rep., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41049-w.

T. K. Tegegne, “SPATIAL VARIATIONS AND ASSOCIATED FACTORS OF MODERN CONTRACEPTIVE USE IN ETHIOPIA: A SPATIAL AND MULTILEVEL ANALYSIS,” BMJ Open, vol. 10, no. 10, 2020, doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037532. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037532

H. G. Gebrekidan, M. Alemayehu, and G. T. Debelew, “TREND AND MULTIVARIATE DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS OF MODERN CONTRACEPTIVE UTILIZATION AMONG WOMEN IN ETHIOPIA FAMILY GUIDANCE ASSOCIATION OF ETHIOPIA,” pp. 1–15, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-96394-9

A. N. F. Versypt, R. A. Segal, and S. S. S. Editors, MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WOMEN ‘ S HEALTH.

M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G. E. Karniadakis, “PHYSICS-INFORMED NEURAL NETWORKS: A DEEP LEARNING FRAMEWORK FOR SOLVING FORWARD AND INVERSE PROBLEMS INVOLVING NONLINEAR PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 378, pp. 686–707, 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045.

K. L. D. MacQuarrie, C. Allen, and A. Gemmill, “DEMOGRAPHIC AND FERTILITY CHARACTERISTICS OF CONTRACEPTIVE CLUSTERS IN BURUNDI,” Stud. Fam. Plann., vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 415–438, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12179.

A. M. Tartakovsky, C. Ortiz Marrero, P. Perdikaris, G. D. Tartakovsky, and Barajas-Solano., “PHYSICS‐INFORMED DEEP NEURAL NETWORKS FOR LEARNING PARAMETERS AND.PDF,” Water Resour. Res., 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026731.

C. Millevoi, D. Pasetto, and M. Ferronato, “A PHYSICS-INFORMED NEURAL NETWORK APPROACH FOR COMPARTMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGICAL MODELS,” PLoS Comput. Biol., vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 1–29, 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012387.

BPS Sumbar, Sumatera Barat Dalam Angka 2023. Sumatera Barat: BPS-Statistics of Sumatera Barat Province, 2023.

BPS Sumbar, “Sumatera Barat Dalam Angka 2021,” 2021.

BPS Sumbar, Sumatera Barat Dalam Angka 2016. Sumatera Barat: BPS-Statistics of Sumatera Barat Province, 2016.

BPS Sumbar, “Sumatera Barat Dalam Angka 2019,” Sumatera Barat, 2019.

BPS Sumbar, “Provinsi Sumatera Barat dalam angka 2024,” Badan Stat. Provinsi Sumatera Barat, vol. 54, pp. 282–283, 2024.

J. Bongaarts, “CAN FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMS REDUCE HIGH DESIRED FAMILY SIZE IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA?,” Int. Perspect. Sex. Reprod. Health, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 209–216, 2011. doi: https://doi.org/10.1363/3720911.

F. Xie, Z. Zhang, L. Li, B. Zhou, and Y. Tan, “EPIGNN: EXPLORING SPATIAL TRANSMISSION WITH GRAPH NEURAL NETWORK FOR REGIONAL EPIDEMIC FORECASTING,” Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics), vol. 13718 LNAI, pp. 469–485, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26422-1_29.

V. M. Croft, S. C. J. L. van Iersel, and C. Della Santina, “FORECASTING INFECTIONS WITH SPATIO-TEMPORAL GRAPH NEURAL NETWORKS: A CASE STUDY OF THE DUTCH SARS-COV-2 SPREAD,” Front. Phys., vol. 11, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2023.1277052.

A. Kamali, M. Sarabian, and K. Laksari, “ELASTICITY IMAGING USING PHYSICS-INFORMED NEURAL NETWORKS: SPATIAL DISCOVERY OF ELASTIC MODULUS AND POISSON’S RATIO,” Acta Biomater., vol. 155, pp. 400–409, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2022.11.024.

N. Wiedemann, H. Martin, and R. Westerholt, “BENCHMARKING REGRESSION MODELS UNDER SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY,” 2023, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, Dagstuhl Publishing, Germany.

A. K. Barry, A. W. Gichuhi, and L. Nderu, “SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY MODELING USING MACHINE LEARNING BASED ON A HYBRID OF RANDOM FOREST AND CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORK (CNN),” J. Data Anal. Inf. Process., vol. 12, no. 03, pp. 319–347, 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/jdaip.2024.123018.

Published
2026-08-24
How to Cite
[1]
L. Kurnia, N. A. Samat, and M. Meilisa, “MODELING AND ESTIMATING DYNAMIC CONTRACEPTIVE BEHAVIOR USING SPATIO-TEMPORAL PHYSICS-INFORMED NEURAL NETWORKS”, BAREKENG: J. Math. & App., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 3167-3184, Aug. 2026.