PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA YANG DIAJARKAN DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE DAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KONVENSIONAL

  • Nilam Wally Universitas Pattimura
  • Juliana Selvina Molle Universitas Pattimura
  • Christina Martha Laamena Universitas Pattimura
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30598/jupitekvol3iss1pp39-44
Keywords: learning outcomes, cooperative learning, conventional learning

Abstract

This research is motivated by student mathematics learning outcomes on the material two-dimentional figure still low. The learning process is still teacher-centered and there is a lack of good cooperation between students in discussions when the learning process takes place. This research is an experimental study that aims to determine whether there are differences in student learning outcomes taught by cooperative models Think Pair share and learning models The conventional research design used is Nonrandomized Control Group Posttest Design. The population in this study were all eighth grade students of Ambon-Wathan High School with 100 students and the sample in this study was 40 students, selected using purposive sampling. The instrument used in this study was in the form of test questions which consisted of question details for the final test. The analysis used is statistical analysis, which is t-test. Calculation results obtained, namely the value of Sig. (2-tailed) < α or 0.026 <0.05 which causes H0 to be rejected and H1 to be accepted. Based on the accepted hypothesis, the results of the study showed that there were differences in the learning outcomes of the experimental class and control class students who were taught with the Cooperative learning model of the Think Pair share type and the conventional learning model on the Material of Blocks and Beams

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aqib, Z. (2013). Model-Model, Media Dan Strategi Pembelajaran Kontekstual (Inovatif). Bandung: Yrama Widya.

Joseph, E. (2012). Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Pengukuran Dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan RME (Realistic Mathematic Education) Pada Siswa Kelas II SD Negeri 2 Galala.Ambon: FKIP Unpatti.

Kurniasih, I & Sani, B. (2016). Ragam Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran untuk Peningkatan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: Kata Pena

Mutia. (2017). Analisis kesulitan siswa SMP dalam pemahaman konsep kubus balok dan alternatif pemecahannya. (Online). Diakses di https://jurnalbeta.ac.id/index.php/betaJTM/article/download/107/89/

Ratumanan. (2015). Inovasi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.

Trianto. (2009). Mendesaian Model Pembelajaran Inovatif-Progresif. Jakarta Kencana Prenada Group.

Sanjaya, W. (2017). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

Shoimin, A. (2016). 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Arruzz Media.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sukardi. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi aksara.

Sulistyaningsih, E. (2016). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika geometri PISA pada siswa kelas VIII semester genap SMP Negeri 1Mojosongo Tahun 2015/2016. (Online). Diakses di http://eprints.ums.ac.id/44952/

Yuliastutik, A. (2010).Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Dengan Media Video Campact Disk (Vcd) Dalam Upaya MeningkatkanMotivasiBelajar Dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa. (http://core.ac.uk/download/files/478/16507757.pdf).Diakses pada 2 Januari 2018

Published
2020-06-01
How to Cite
Wally, N., Molle, J., & Laamena, C. (2020). PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA YANG DIAJARKAN DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE DAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KONVENSIONAL. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (JUPITEK), 3(1), 39-44. https://doi.org/10.30598/jupitekvol3iss1pp39-44
Issue
Vol 3 No 1 (2020): Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (JUPITEK)
Section
Articles

Copyright (c) 2020 Nilam Wally, Juliana Selvina Molle, Christina Martha Laamena

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

License and Copyright Agreement

In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read  Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (Jupitek) Posting Your Article Policy.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

Copyright

Authors who publish with Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (Jupitek) agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.