DYNAMICAL ANALYSIS OF TWO LOAN CATEGORIES IN A BANKING SYSTEM WITH NON-PERFORMING LOANS
Abstract
The ability of banks to extend credit and meet their obligations to depositors can be significantly affected by the presence of non-performing loans (NPL). The intermediation process, in which deposits are transformed into loans, can be represented through a predator–prey modeling framework. In this study, we formulate and analyze a system of three nonlinear ordinary differential equations representing deposits as the prey and two categories of loans, individual loans and company loans, as predators within a single banking system. The model incorporates the effect of NPLs as factors that reduce effective loan performance and influence system interactions. The analytical results show that the system possesses five equilibrium points. The equilibrium corresponding to the absence of deposits and loans is unstable, while the remaining four equilibria are globally asymptotically stable under specific parameter conditions, particularly those related to loan growth rates and NPL levels. The stability analysis indicates that higher NPL rates tend to reduce the stability region of equilibria and may destabilize the banking system. Furthermore, numerical simulations are conducted to support and illustrate the analytical findings. These results provide insight into the long-term dynamic behavior of deposits and loans, emphasizing the role of NPLs in determining banking system stability.
Downloads
References
X. Chen, Y. Wu, Y. Ding, and T. Zhang, “EXPLORING THE NEXUS OF LIQUIDITY REGULATION, BANK RISK-TAKING, AND SHADOW BANKING: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF CHINESE COMMERCIAL BANKS,” J. Knowl. Econ., pp. 601–629, 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02013-9.
N. Sumarti and M. F. Ansori, MODEL MATEMATIKA PERBANKAN. ITB Press, 2022.
C. Zheng, A. Das Gupta, and S. Moudud-Ul-huq, “EFFECT OF HUMAN CAPITAL EFFICIENCY ON BANK RISK-TAKING BEHAVIOR AND CAPITAL REGULATION: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM A DEVELOPING COUNTRY,” Asian Econ. Financ. Rev., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 231–247, 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.aefr.2018.82.231.247.
S. Ullah, S. I. Hussain, A. A. Nabi, and K. A. Mubashir, “ROLE OF REGULATORY GOVERNANCE IN FINANCIAL STABILITY: A COMPARISON OF HIGH AND LOW INCOME COUNTRIES,” J. Cent. Bank. Theory Pract., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 207–226, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/jcbtp-2022-0009.
A. Das Gupta, N. Sarker, and M. Rifat Rahman, “RELATIONSHIP AMONG COST OF FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION, RISK, AND EFFICIENCY: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM BANGLADESHI COMMERCIAL BANKS,” Cogent Econ. Financ., vol. 9, no. 1, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2021.1967575.
T. M. Yhip and B. M. D. Alagheband, THE PRACTICE OF LENDING: A GUIDE TO CREDIT ANALYSIS AND CREDIT RISK. 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32197-0.
M. Naili and Y. Lahrichi, “THE DETERMINANTS OF BANKS’ CREDIT RISK: REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE AND FUTURE RESEARCH AGENDA,” Int. J. Financ. Econ., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 334–360, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2156.
H. van Greuning and S. Brajovic Bratanovic, ANALYZING BANKING RISK (3RD EDITION). 2009. doi: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-7728-4.
M. Yurttadur, E. Celiktas, and E. Celiktas, “THE PLACE OF NON-PERFORMING LOANS IN THE TURKISH BANKING SECTOR,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 158, pp. 766–771, 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.113.
S. Sochib, F. S. Liyundira, and A. Yulianti, “THE EFFECT OF LDR, NPL, CAR ON RETURN ON ASSET OF CONVENTIONAL NATIONAL COMMERCIAL BANK IN INDONESIA,” Int. J. Account. Manag. Res., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 51–59, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.30741/ijamr.v4i1.1104
A. Sánchez Serrano, “THE IMPACT OF NON-PERFORMING LOANS ON BANK LENDING IN EUROPE: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS,” North Am. J. Econ. Financ., vol. 55, no. December 2019, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2020.101312.
Q. T. Phung, H. Van Vu, and H. P. Tran, “DO NON-PERFORMING LOANS IMPACT BANK EFFICIENCY?,” Financ. Res. Lett., vol. 46, no. PB, p. 102393, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102393.
M. Karadima and H. Louri, “ECONOMIC POLICY UNCERTAINTY AND NON-PERFORMING LOANS: THE MODERATING ROLE OF BANK CONCENTRATION,” Financ. Res. Lett., vol. 38, no. February 2020, p. 101458, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101458.
S. K. Singh, B. Basuki, and R. Setiawan, “THE EFFECT OF NON-PERFORMING LOAN ON PROFITABILITY: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM NEPALESE COMMERCIAL BANKS,” J. Asian Financ. Econ. Bus., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 709–716, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no4.0709.
N. Sumarti, R. Nurfitriyana, and W. Nurwenda, “A DYNAMICAL SYSTEM OF DEPOSIT AND LOAN VOLUMES BASED ON THE LOTKA-VOLTERRA MODEL,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 1587, no. 1, pp. 92–94, 2014. doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4866541.
N. Sumarti and H. Fansuri, “NUMERICAL ANALYSIS ON THE STABILITY BEHAVIOR OF A DYNAMICAL SYSTEM ON THE DEPOSIT AND LOAN OF A BANK,” Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Comput. Sci. Technol., vol. 5, pp. 125–128, 2015. doi: https://doi.org/10.2991/iccst-15.2015.24.
A. Fadhlurrahman and N. Sumarti, “IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DYNAMICAL SYSTEM OF THE DEPOSIT AND LOAN GROWTH BASED ON THE LOTKA-VOLTERRA MODEL AND THE IMPROVED MODEL,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 1723, 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4945065.
M. F. Ansori, K. A. Sidarto, N. Sumarti, and I. Gunadi, “DYNAMICS OF BANK’S BALANCE SHEET: A SYSTEM OF DETERMINISTIC AND STOCHASTIC DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS APPROACH,” Int. J. Math. Comput. Sci., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 871–884, 2021.
Y. Long, L. Wang, and J. Li, “UNIFORM PERSISTENCE AND MULTISTABILITY IN A TWO-PREDATOR–ONE-PREY SYSTEM WITH INTER-SPECIFIC AND INTRA-SPECIFIC COMPETITION,” J. Appl. Math. Comput., vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 767–794, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12190-021-01551-8.
O. F. Damayanti, I. Darti, and A. Suryanto, “DYNAMICS OF DEPOSIT AND LOAN VOLUMES MODEL WITH NON-PERFORMING LOAN AND DEPOSIT WITHDRAWAL FACTORS,” Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.29020/nybg.ejpam.v18i1.5643.
L. Perko, DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS AND DYNAMICAL SYSTEMs, vol. 7. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
Y. Cai, C. Zhao, W. Wang, and J. Wang, “DYNAMICS OF A LESLIE-GOWER PREDATOR-PREY MODEL WITH ADDITIVE ALLEE EFFECT,” Appl. Math. Model., vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 2092–2106, 2015. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2014.09.038.
J. D. Murray, MATHEMATICAL BIOLOGY: I. AN INTRODUCTION, vol. 17. Springer Science & Business Media, 2007.
G. C. Layek, AN INTRODUCTION TO DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS AND CHAOS. 2015. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2556-0.
H. F. Romli, A. Suryanto, and I. Darti, “DYNAMICS OF FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE SPREAD MODEL FOR CATTLE WITH CARRIER, VACCINATION, AND ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSMISSION,” Commun. Math. Biol. Neurosci., vol. 2023, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.28919/cmbn/8207.
A. Suryanto, I. Darti, and Trisilowati, “DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR OF A HARVESTED LOGISTIC MODEL INCORPORATING FEEDBACK CONTROL,” Commun. Math. Biol. Neurosci., vol. 2024, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.28919/cmbn/8227.
Copyright (c) 2026 Onik Febria Damayanti, Isnani Darti, Agus Suryanto, Nur Shofianah, Trisilowati Trisilowati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this Journal agree to the following terms:
- Author retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a creative commons attribution license that allow others to share the work within an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication of this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangement for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g. acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal).
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their websites) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published works.
1.gif)
