STRATEGI SCAFFOLDING BERDASARKAN GAYA BELAJAR DAN ARGUMENTASI SISWA: STUDI KASUS PADA PEMBELAJARAN POLA BILANGAN
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan strategi scaffolding yang dilakukan guru dalam pembelajaran pola bilangan bagi siswa sekolah dasar. Scaffolding dilakukan berdasarkan dua variabel yaitu (1) gaya belajar visual, auditory dan kinestetik (VAK) serta (2) argumentasi yang telah dikonstruksi siswa. Gaya belajar diselidiki melalui tes dan observasi VAK dan proses pemecahan masalah sedangkan argumentasi siswa dianalisis menggunakan komponen argumentasi Toulmin. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa strategi scaffolding berbeda dibutuhkan oleh siswa sesuai gaya belajar dan jenis argumen yang dikonstruksi. Pemelajar auditory membutuhkan strategi reviewing dan explaining; pemelajar visual membutuhkan strategi environmental provisions; pemelajar kinestetik membutuhkan strategi restructuring dan reviewing. Khusus pada pemelajar visual dan kinestetik, mereka membutuhkan multimedia sebagai scaffolding yang bermakna. Selama scaffolding argumentasi siswa berkembang dan menghasilkan peningkatan kemampuan problem solving.
Downloads
References
Abbas Pourhossein Gilakjani dan S. M. Ahmadi, “The Effect of Visual, Auditory, and Kinaesthetic Learning Styles on Language Teaching,†International Conferences on Social Science and Huminity, 2011, Vol. 5, pp. 469–472.
A. Bakker, J. Smit, and R. Wegerif, “Scaffolding and Dialogic Teaching in Mathematics Education: Introduction and Review,†ZDM Math. Educ., Vol. 47, pp. 1047–1065, 2015.
A. Zohar and F. Nemet, “Fostering Stundets’ Knowledge and Argumentation Skill Through Dilemmas in Human Genetics,†J. Res. Sci., Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 35–62, 2002.
C. S. Asterhan and B. Schwarz, “The Effects of Monological and Dialogical Argumentation on Concept Learning in Evolutionary Theory,†J. Educ. Psychol., Vol. 99, No. 3, pp. 626–639, 2007.
C. Tulbure, “Learning Styles, Teaching Strategies and Academic Achievement in Higher Education: A Cross-Sectional Investigation,†Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci., Vol. 33, pp. 398–402, 2012.
D. Holton and D. Clarke, “Scaffolding and Metacognition,†Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol., Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 127–143, 2006.
G. Fayombo, “Learning Styles, Teaching Strategies and Academic Achievement Among Some Psychology Undergraduates in Barbados,†Caribb. Educ. Res. J. Univ. West Indies, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 46–61, 2015.
H. Upu, Djadir, and S. Asyari, “The Fifth Graders’ Mathematisation Process in Solving Contextual Problems,†World Trans. Eng. Technol. Educ., Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 195–199, 2017.
J. Anghileri, “Scaffolding Practices That Enhance Mathematics,†J. Math. Teach. Educ., Vol. 9, pp. 33–52, 2006.
J. Fielding-Wells, “Inquiry-Based Argumentation in Primary Mathematics: Reflecting on Evidence,†Mathematics Education: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow (Proceedings of the 36th annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Autralasia, 2013, pp. 290–297.
J. Smit and D. van Eerde, “What Counts as Evidence for the Long-Term Realisation of Whole-Class Scaffolding?,†Learn. Cult. Soc. Interact., Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 22–31, 2013.
J. van de Pol, M. Volman, and J. Beishuizen, “Scaffolding in Teacher-Student Interaction: A Decade of Research,†Educ. Psychol. Rev., Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 271–296, 2010.
L. Berland and B. Reiser, “Making Sense of Argumentation and Explanation Science Education,†Sci. Educ., Vol. 93, No. 1, pp. 26–55, 2009.
M. Jimenez-Aleixandre and S. Erduran, “Argumentation in Science Education,†in Argumentation in Science Education: An Overview, 2007, pp. 3–27.
N. Moussa, “The Importance of Learning Styles in Education,†Inst. Learn. Styles Journal◠Vol., Vol. 1, pp. 19–27, 2014.
O. Broza and Y. B. D. Kolikant, “Contingent Teaching to Low-Achieving Students in Mathematics: Challenges and Potential for Scaffolding Meaningful Learning,†ZDM - Math. Educ., Vol. 47, No. 7, pp. 1093–1105, 2015.
P. Gibbons, "Scaffolding Language, Scaffolding Learning: Teaching Second Language Learners in the Mainstream Classroom", Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 2002.
R. Dunn, “Learning Styles of the Multiculturally Diverse,†Emerg. Libr., Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 24–32, 1993.
R. M. Felder dan R. Brent, “Understanding Student Differences,†J. Eng. Educ., Vol. 94, No. 1, pp. 57–72, 2005.
S. Anik, “Proses Berpikir Siswa Kelas IX-G SMP Negeri I Wlingi Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Persamaan Garis Lurus dengan Scafolding,†Makalah Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, Malang 27-30 Juni 2013, 2013.
S. E. Toulmin, "The Uses of Argument", Second Edition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press., 2003.
S. Gholami, “Relationship Between VAK Learning Styles and Problem Solving Styles regarding Gender and Students’ Fields of Study,†J. Lang. Teach. Res., Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 700–706, 2013.
S. H. Landry, K. E. Miller-Loncar, C. L.Smith, and P. R. Swank, “The Role of Early Parenting in Children’s Development of Executive Processes.,†Dev. Neuropsychol., Vol. 21, pp. 15–41, 2010.
T. H. Lin, Y. Y. Hsu, S. S. Lin, M. L. Changlai, K. Y. Yang, and T. L. Lai, “A Review of Empirical Evidence on Scaffolding For Science Education,†Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ., Vol. 10, pp. 437–455, 2012.
T. Lehmann and D. Ifenthaler, “Influence of Students’ Learning Styles on the Effectiveness of Instructional Interventions,†Int. Conf. Cogn. Explor. Learn. Digit. Age, pp. 180–188, 2012.
“VAK Test.,†Discov. your Prefer. Learn. Style. Retrieved Desember, 2015 http//www.brainboxx.co.uk/a3_aspects/pdf/VAK_questionnaire.pdf.
Authors who publish with this Journal agree to the following terms:
- Author retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a creative commons attribution license that allow others to share the work within an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication of this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangement for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g. acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal).
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their websites) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published works.
